From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 14:08:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 23594 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 14:08:45 -0000 Received: from fiinbeck.math.ntnu.no (129.241.15.140) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 14:08:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90503 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 14:08:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 14:08:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:08:14 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20060103.150814.233832885.hanche@math.ntnu.no> To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory From: Harald Hanche-Olsen In-Reply-To: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> References: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 23.0.0 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit + lists@peterschen.de: | I'm using qmail with vpopmail and simscan. Via simscan I'm using | Spamassassin 3.1. Is there any possibility to move any incoming | mails, which are tagged by sa, in a special directory for that | perticular domain? Or is this a vpopmail question? Whatever it is, I am pretty sure it isn't a qmail question. If the mail has been tagged before it gets to local delivery, it is possible that condredirect will help. - Harald From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 14:03:31 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 17576 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 14:03:59 -0000 Received: from mail.midwest-connections.com (69.148.152.10) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 14:03:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9854 invoked by uid 503); 3 Jan 2006 15:04:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mwc-acomputer) (zanecb@69.155.32.130) by 0 with ESMTPA; 3 Jan 2006 15:04:41 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:03:31 -0600 From: "Zane C. B." To: lists@peterschen.de Cc: "qmail@list.cr.yp.to" Subject: Re: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory Message-ID: <20060103080331.00004888@mwc-acomputer> In-Reply-To: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> References: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4.1 Win32 (GTK+ 1.3.0; Win32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:55:15 +0100 lists@peterschen.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using qmail with vpopmail and simscan. Via simscan I'm using > Spamassassin 3.1. Is there any possibility to move any incoming mails, > which are tagged by sa, in a special directory for that perticular > domain? Or is this a vpopmail question? Not used vpopmail here, but for dumping it to different maildirs, I am using procmail. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 13:55:15 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6774 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 13:56:13 -0000 Received: from mail.petli.com (62.141.51.97) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 13:56:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7392 invoked by uid 33); 3 Jan 2006 13:55:15 -0000 Received: from luenecom.cgw.lg.de.bcc-ip.net (luenecom.cgw.lg.de.bcc-ip.net [212.68.66.238]) by mail.petli.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:55:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:55:15 +0100 From: lists@peterschen.de To: "qmail@list.cr.yp.to" Subject: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) Hi, I'm using qmail with vpopmail and simscan. Via simscan I'm using Spamassassin 3.1. Is there any possibility to move any incoming mails, which are tagged by sa, in a special directory for that perticular domain? Or is this a vpopmail question? Regards Christoph From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 15:32:26 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 21679 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 15:31:12 -0000 Received: from web22.dimakhconsultants.com (HELO dc2.dimakhconsultants.com) (67.15.88.12) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 15:31:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31073 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 16:52:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.4.179) by ev1s-67-15-88-140.ev1servers.net with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 16:52:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 3920 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2006 15:32:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:02:26 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu " To: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory Message-ID: <20060103153226.GA3874@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: "K. Shantanu " , qmail mailing list References: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * lists@peterschen.de [060103 20:58]: > Hi, > > I'm using qmail with vpopmail and simscan. Via simscan I'm using > Spamassassin 3.1. Is there any possibility to move any incoming mails, > which are tagged by sa, in a special directory for that perticular > domain? Or is this a vpopmail question? Never used simscan and not used vpopmail for long time, but I guess it will be easy in you can control it using .qmail files. Something like grep for particular string in header and then use safecat to move it to different maildir can help. Or even using maildrop can help here. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 14:08:05 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 23863 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 14:09:03 -0000 Received: from mail.petli.com (62.141.51.97) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 14:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 7862 invoked by uid 33); 3 Jan 2006 14:08:05 -0000 Received: from luenecom.cgw.lg.de.bcc-ip.net (luenecom.cgw.lg.de.bcc-ip.net [212.68.66.238]) by mail.petli.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:08:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20060103150805.3vnzzvur4s0so80c@mail.petli.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:08:05 +0100 From: lists@peterschen.de To: "qmail@list.cr.yp.to" Subject: Re: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory References: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> <20060103080331.00004888@mwc-acomputer> In-Reply-To: <20060103080331.00004888@mwc-acomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) Zitat von "Zane C. B." : > Not used vpopmail here, but for dumping it to different maildirs, I am > using procmail. > Yeah, but I don't want to create for each costumer a rule with procmail. Or is it possible to invoke one scipt for each domain? Reagrds Christoph From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 18:46:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 40128 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 18:46:43 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 18:46:43 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669767EC4 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:46:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:46:14 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: qmail mailing list Subject: Mail queue problems. Message-ID: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII We have recently taken over an ISP that uses Qmail. My experience has only been with Postfix and Sendmail and am trying to put together how Qmail works. In the last week there have been some issues regarding mail delivery, both locally and remotely. There are three servers, all of the handling incoming and outbound mail. One server mailq: messages in queue: 2700 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 7 Current smtpd sessions: 54 Mail currently being delivered remotely: 23 Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 Current POP mail: 0 Server #2: messages in queue: 1404 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 6 Current smtpd sessions: 47 Mail currently being delivered remotely: 18 Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 Current POP mail: 1 Server #3: messages in queue: 1516 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 Current smtpd sessions: 57 Mail currently being delivered remotely: 10 Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 Current POP mail: 2 Last week the queues on two of the machines were sitting at over 100k mails in both the preprocessed queue and the queue. Stopping and starting qmail on each of the servers has cleaned them out to a degree but mail delivery locally and remotely is still and issue. Most, if not all of the mails were <> null senders. I need to clean out the queue's. With postfix I built some scripts to clean out the queues, but with Qmail Ive read that its bad to delete mail from the queue and it should be expired out instead. There is valid mail in the queues but it takes forever to deliver. SA and Clam are being used on these machines as well rblsmtpd is used too. Where can I start looking at this to figure out why Qmail is so slow at processing mail? The log file sucks as *everything* is logged to one big file by something called Overlord. Syslog is one line: *.* /usr/sbin/overlord Makes it hard to figure what program is doing what. Anyone have some clue to share on where to start? Thanks, Keith From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 19:14:27 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 75182 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 19:15:04 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (4e23e4b5994553a13c5b396088fba14fff550241@70.64.60.7) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 19:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 8047 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2006 19:14:30 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 181cd2e167f861379293951ce16a9c4aa95be48b Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:14:27 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: Mail queue problems. Message-ID: <20060103191427.GB7987@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail mailing list References: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Keith Woodworth wrote: > > We have recently taken over an ISP that uses Qmail. My experience has only > been with Postfix and Sendmail and am trying to put together how Qmail > works. > > In the last week there have been some issues regarding mail delivery, both > locally and remotely. > > There are three servers, all of the handling incoming and outbound mail. Your three servers currently look "normal", based on the info you gave. > Last week the queues on two of the machines were sitting at over 100k > mails in both the preprocessed queue and the queue. Stopping and starting > qmail on each of the servers has cleaned them out to a degree but mail > delivery locally and remotely is still and issue. Starting and stopping qmail-send should not have any beneficial effect on sending of mail. If qmail-send is completely wedged, it's generally because it's blocked waiting on its logger (disk full or similar). Otherwise, stopping and re-starting qmail-send will just slow down mail throughput, as qmail-send has to do a complete queue scan at stop and again at start. > Most, if not all of the mails were <> null senders. Sounds like you got a storm of bounces; you may have been the victim of a joe job, or perhaps there was a hole in your system (exploitable CGI script, bad relaying permissions, etc) that allowed someone to abuse one of your servers for sending spam, and you were seeing the splashback. > The log file sucks as *everything* is logged to one big file by something > called Overlord. Syslog is one line: There's one of your problems. qmail works so fast that it can cause syslog to suck up 90%+ of your CPU. Change your qmail-send configuration to log through multilog instead of splogger->syslog. Then your qmail-send logs will be separate and easily analyzable. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 19:56:09 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 24574 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 19:56:40 -0000 Received: from moebius2.space.net (@195.30.1.100) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 19:56:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 58717 invoked by uid 1013); 3 Jan 2006 19:56:09 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=uj8CoCMf4s+7E/bqO42OBjpRbocjuMEcn2gA0OwQvc+t7nTkwET2mbaVtALNFFzJ ; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:56:09 +0100 From: Markus Stumpf To: Jeremy Kister Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: temporary block address based on rate of incoming mail Message-ID: <20060103195609.GC20145@Space.Net> References: <20051224083804.GA11450@qwestip.net> <43B05235.8070701@jeremykister.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B05235.8070701@jeremykister.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: SpaceNet AG, Muenchen, Germany X-PGP-Fingerprint: 66 F3 75 79 01 D0 B8 5F 1A C7 77 88 4A B6 70 DF On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 03:27:33PM -0500, Jeremy Kister wrote: > Beware of people who drink the no-perl koolaid - a server > spends more cpu watching the code run in 'top' than running the code itself. Replacing an small perl checkpassword programm (with MySQL support) on a server with some 50+ POP3 connects/second by a equivalent written in C reduced the load on that server *very drastically*. The server spent more time "compiling" the perl code than actually running it. If the perl program is a "start once - run forever" type like tcpserver it doesn't make a big difference. If it is a "start over and over again, run shortly" like qmail-queue replacements it will totally trash really busy server. \Maex P.S. This can be easily tested (but is off topic for this list) Write a small program in C and perl that does (concept code): print("
    "); dfd = opendir(somedir); while (fn = readdir(dfd)) print("
  • %s", fn); closedir(dfd); print("
"); install both as a CGI on a e.g. Apache server (without mod_perl) and do hmmm ... 5 req/s for 10 minutes against the C program and do the same with the perl script. Now change it to 50 req/s. Do you notice some difference? -- SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 "The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin" From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 20:48:23 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 89201 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 20:49:03 -0000 Received: from mail.gormand.com.au (HELO test.gormand.com.au) (220.233.81.113) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 20:49:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 25940 invoked by uid 453); 3 Jan 2006 20:48:31 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: test.gormand.com.au Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by test.gormand.com.au (qpsmtpd/0.31-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:48:25 +1100 Received: from c243-111.rim.net (c243-111.rim.net [216.9.243.111]) by www.gormand.com.au (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:48:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:48:23 -0500 From: Peter Samuel To: jared Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Originating-IP: 216.9.243.111 X-Sent-Via: Mitel Networks SME Server Quoting jared : > Scott, > > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. > Can you give me an example on how this could be done? > Danger Will Robinson! Let's step back a bit here. You're trying to patch qmail-smtpd with your own code which is not working as you'd hope (otherwise you probably wouldn't need the core dump) but at the same time you don't have the skills to patch a simple shell script. Sounds like you're trying to run before you can walk. Try this: #!/bin/sh ulimit -c 1024 exec .... -- Regards Peter ------------- Peter Samuel Peter.Samuel@gormand.com.au From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 21:06:43 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 15507 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 21:09:34 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 21:09:34 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EttOe-00048m-Ia for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:08:44 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:08:44 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:08:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:06:43 -0500 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news Thanks for the vote of confidence! :) Already tried that -- adding the ulimit to the top of the script. (actually I used 'ulimit -c unlimited'). Didn't work. That's when I tried to add the ulimit command as part of the exec line...thinking that that might somehow help. Any ideas? Jared Peter Samuel wrote: > Quoting jared : > >> Scott, >> >> Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. >> Can you give me an example on how this could be done? >> > > Danger Will Robinson! > > Let's step back a bit here. You're trying to patch qmail-smtpd with your > own code which is not working as you'd hope (otherwise you probably > wouldn't need the core dump) but at the same time you don't have the > skills to patch a simple shell script. Sounds like you're trying to run > before you can walk. > > Try this: > > #!/bin/sh > > ulimit -c 1024 > exec .... > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 21:33:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 45519 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 21:34:10 -0000 Received: from mail.gormand.com.au (HELO test.gormand.com.au) (220.233.81.113) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 21:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 29195 invoked by uid 453); 3 Jan 2006 21:33:39 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: test.gormand.com.au Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by test.gormand.com.au (qpsmtpd/0.31-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:33:37 +1100 Received: from c243-111.rim.net (c243-111.rim.net [216.9.243.111]) by www.gormand.com.au (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:33:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:33:36 -0500 From: Peter Samuel To: jared Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Originating-IP: 216.9.243.111 X-Sent-Via: Mitel Networks SME Server Quoting jared : > Thanks for the vote of confidence! :) My pleasure :) > > Already tried that -- adding the ulimit to the top of the script. > (actually I used 'ulimit -c unlimited'). > > Didn't work. I bet it did - however your program may not have dumped core for other reasons. > That's when I tried to add the ulimit command as part of the exec > line...thinking that that might somehow help. Obviously not - exec doesn't do that. > > Any ideas? Did you try the gdb route someone else suggested? -- Regards Peter ------------- Peter Samuel Peter.Samuel@gormand.com.au From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 20:22:11 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 59451 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 20:24:40 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 20:24:40 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EtshO-0001ge-Q4 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:24:02 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:24:02 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:24:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:22:11 -0500 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news Scott, Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. Can you give me an example on how this could be done? Thanks, Jared Scott Gifford wrote: > Peter Samuel writes: > > >>Quoting jared : >> >> >>>Hmm...thanks. I'll give that a try. But it doesn't really answer >>>the question. Does anyone know how to get core dumps on Linux no >>>matter what? >> >>Use your shell's builtin ulimit command. This is on FC4 using bash as >>the shell >> >>[peters@localhost ~]$ type ulimit >>ulimit is a shell builtin > > > [...] > > >>If you wish to have this set permanently, modify /etc/profile >>accordingly (that's where it is set in FC4, your system may be >>different). > > > Putting an appropriate ulimit command in your qmail-smtpd run file > should allow you to enable core dumps for qmail-smtpd and its children > without affecting the rest of the system. > > -----Scott. > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 22:14:18 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 92769 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 22:14:50 -0000 Received: from mail.securax.org (212.123.25.145) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17956 invoked by uid 2077); 3 Jan 2006 22:12:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.4.10?) (voland@shadowblade.net@212.39.85.178) by mail.securax.org with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:12:50 -0000 Subject: Re: All e-mails tagged from Spamassassin automatically in a different directory From: Kiril Todorov Reply-To: voland@shadowblade.net To: lists@peterschen.de Cc: "qmail@list.cr.yp.to" In-Reply-To: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> References: <20060103145515.muk8eevs2s4wooow@mail.petli.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Shadow::Darkness Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:14:18 +0200 Message-Id: <1136326458.7864.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:55 +0100, lists@peterschen.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using qmail with vpopmail and simscan. Via simscan I'm using > Spamassassin 3.1. Is there any possibility to move any incoming mails, > which are tagged by sa, in a special directory for that perticular > domain? Or is this a vpopmail question? > > Regards > Christoph > This actually belongs to the simscan list, but in short, you might want to check the simscan options for spam-hits and quarantine dir. Or, you can play with procmail/maildrop and the $EXT $HOST environmental variables at dot-qmail. Again, the best place for this is the simscan list. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 21:53:55 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 72550 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 21:56:36 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 21:56:36 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Etu8L-0007E8-A4 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:55:58 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:55:57 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:55:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:53:55 -0500 Lines: 65 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news Scott, Thanks for your kindness. Didn't work. Any guesses why? Smtpd runs as qmaild. It's run from /var/qmail/bin. Permissions are: '755 root qmail' on /var, /var/qmail, and /var/qmail/bin. Couldn't be a permissions thing could it? Thanks, Jared > Scott, > > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize > ulimit. Can you give me an example on how this could be done? Just put it before the exec: #!/bin/sh # ... ulimit -c 1000000000 # 1GB Core Files exec ... ulimit is a shell builtin (like chdir), so it affects the running script, and will then effect any child processes started up. ulimit's status as a shell builtin is also why exec doesn't recognize it. You can check whether something's a shell builtin with the "type" command: $ type ulimit ulimit is a shell builtin ----ScottG. Peter Samuel wrote: > Quoting jared : > >> Thanks for the vote of confidence! :) > > > My pleasure :) > >> >> Already tried that -- adding the ulimit to the top of the script. >> (actually I used 'ulimit -c unlimited'). >> >> Didn't work. > > > I bet it did - however your program may not have dumped core for other > reasons. > >> That's when I tried to add the ulimit command as part of the exec >> line...thinking that that might somehow help. > > > Obviously not - exec doesn't do that. > >> >> Any ideas? > > > Did you try the gdb route someone else suggested? > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 22:16:08 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 95828 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 22:16:41 -0000 Received: from pool-68-161-47-207.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (68.161.47.207) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:16:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2878 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 22:08:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:08:40 -0000 Message-ID: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:16:08 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit technically, u cannot get core dumps no matter what. There is a security issue with dumping system programs, and programs that belong to other folks. If the program is EXEC only, then u *not* gonna get a dump. If u have permission ( i suppose u need at least read permission ), then a "ulimit -c unlimited" would better suit your purpose. 1024 blocks is just 512kb ( maybe a meg if your blocksize is 1024bytes/block ). And from reading the kernel code there are more ( interesting ) issues with creating the core file: > file = filp_open(corename, O_CREAT | 2 | O_NOFOLLOW | O_LARGEFILE, 0600); > if (IS_ERR(file)) > goto fail_unlock; > inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode; > if (inode->i_nlink > 1) > goto close_fail; /* multiple links - don't dump */ > if (d_unhashed(file->f_dentry)) > goto close_fail; > > if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) > goto close_fail; > if (!file->f_op) > goto close_fail; > if (!file->f_op->write) > goto close_fail; > if (do_truncate(file->f_dentry, 0) != 0) > goto close_fail; > So if u cant open, is not a regular file, does not have write permission, unable to truncate file, these also stop core dumps. changing user id's, and group id's also nullify a core dump. There are lots of reasons why. Which one. I can't always tell. But u can, presuming u can rebuild the kernel, sprinkle printk calls at the various points (fs/exec.c:do_codedump() ). U should do this on a system that you can play with. And once u know why, u can fix it to always dump core. FWIW, i have also not been too successfull in getting dumps when I want. Sometimes this is a "good thing"(tm) ;-} jared wrote: > Scott, > > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. > Can you give me an example on how this could be done? > > Thanks, > Jared > > Scott Gifford wrote: > >> Peter Samuel writes: >> >> >>> Quoting jared : >>> >>> >>>> Hmm...thanks. I'll give that a try. But it doesn't really answer >>>> the question. Does anyone know how to get core dumps on Linux no >>>> matter what? >>> >>> >>> Use your shell's builtin ulimit command. This is on FC4 using bash as >>> the shell >>> >>> [peters@localhost ~]$ type ulimit >>> ulimit is a shell builtin >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >>> If you wish to have this set permanently, modify /etc/profile >>> accordingly (that's where it is set in FC4, your system may be >>> different). >> >> >> >> Putting an appropriate ulimit command in your qmail-smtpd run file >> should allow you to enable core dumps for qmail-smtpd and its children >> without affecting the rest of the system. >> >> -----Scott. >> > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 20:58:48 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 3960 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 20:59:17 -0000 Received: from smtp.gfn.org (HELO gfn.org) (205.145.130.34) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 20:59:17 -0000 X-Delivered-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: from gfn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k03Kwm4g002790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0500 Received: (from swgsh@localhost) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.9/Submit) id k03KwmVT002789; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gfn.org: swgsh set sender to sgifford@suspectclass.com using -f To: jared Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> From: Scott Gifford Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: (demottjar@yahoo.com's message of "Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:22:11 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 X-Scanned-By: milter-date/0.6.73 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0500 X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO jared writes: > Scott, > > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize > ulimit. Can you give me an example on how this could be done? Just put it before the exec: #!/bin/sh # ... ulimit -c 1000000000 # 1GB Core Files exec ... ulimit is a shell builtin (like chdir), so it affects the running script, and will then effect any child processes started up. ulimit's status as a shell builtin is also why exec doesn't recognize it. You can check whether something's a shell builtin with the "type" command: $ type ulimit ulimit is a shell builtin ----ScottG. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 22:56:37 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 53248 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 22:57:11 -0000 Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (81.103.221.47) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:57:11 -0000 Received: from aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060103225615.SGEQ21883.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:56:15 +0000 Received: from ednevitible.co.uk ([80.5.148.152]) by aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060103225615.LLQS1068.aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@ednevitible.co.uk> for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:56:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 14484 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Jan 2006 22:56:11 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO workstation) (192.168.0.21) by ednevitible.co.uk with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 22:56:11 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:56:37 +0000 From: ed To: Brian T Glenn Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: rblsmtpd + vchkpw Message-ID: <20060103225637.52bae0fc@workstation> In-Reply-To: <20051230153226.GI29628@delink.net> References: <001d01c60d3e$eaf44bd0$0600a8c0@servidor> <20051230153226.GI29628@delink.net> Organization: the triads X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: =\=1ht]b*gboJ:&+:3x1vGz}fCe40TZJ9s@L2~YGi}]c(fY-_7J]wUR.6MSH\oeq#@H6aAERh(<<1miWJ|x/-1g`r3EmzY3FE?VxmEih9%ETmPd7zChR1"zWC$iuK{|{R+Ss{I3w(KC"_LM%S! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:32:26 -0500 Brian T Glenn wrote: > Because rblsmtpd traps the SMTP conversation and doesn't give a chance > to authenticate, you will have to move the rblsmtpd functionality into > the qmail-smtpd server. There are some patches out there to do exactly > this. Check out qmail.org. Has anyone done this? I was looking at a qgreylist patch which had greylisting at the qmail-smtpd server (have not got around to patching yet though). -- Regards, Ed http://www.usenix.org.uk - http://irc.is-cool.net :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 23:12:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 74276 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 23:12:39 -0000 Received: from a.mx.delink.net (delink@207.166.205.131) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 23:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 25880 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Jan 2006 23:12:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:12:10 -0500 From: Brian T Glenn To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: rblsmtpd + vchkpw Message-ID: <20060103231210.GV29628@delink.net> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <001d01c60d3e$eaf44bd0$0600a8c0@servidor> <20051230153226.GI29628@delink.net> <20060103225637.52bae0fc@workstation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="1AtvaQRkIQxkm1Oe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103225637.52bae0fc@workstation> X-Operating-System: Linux unerreicht 2.6.14-skas3-v9-pre7 X-MTA: qmail-1.03 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i --1AtvaQRkIQxkm1Oe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:56:37PM +0000, ed may have written: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:32:26 -0500 Brian T Glenn = wrote: > >=20 > > There are some patches out there to do exactly > > this. Check out qmail.org. >=20 > Has anyone done this? Fine. Jay Soffian has a qmail-queue replacement to filter against DNS=20 spamlists.. It uses Bruce Guenter's QMAILQUEUE patch. Matching email is=20 not rejected, but instead an X-RBL: header is added, for filtering at=20 the delivery layer. http://qmail.oc1.mirrors.redwire.net/qqrbl HTH HAND, --=20 Brian T Glenn delink.net Internet Services --1AtvaQRkIQxkm1Oe Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIOwQYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIOsjCCDq4CAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC DC0wggToMIIC0KADAgECAgMBtiMwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAweTEQMA4GA1UEChMHUm9vdCBD QTEeMBwGA1UECxMVaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnMSIwIAYDVQQDExlDQSBDZXJ0IFNp Z25pbmcgQXV0aG9yaXR5MSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJzdXBwb3J0QGNhY2VydC5vcmcwHhcN MDUxMjA3MjIyNzA2WhcNMDYxMjA3MjIyNzA2WjA3MRQwEgYDVQQDEwtCcmlhbiBHbGVubjEf MB0GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYQYnJpYW5AZGVsaW5rLm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAMXsOm/TfE630CgQdYuy3pkgM9xxPIsEdm4FpWtXpC/1LiWP846FPh/CnuN6 lXINvVWnlwjgBw180Biq/Cl4QSTBieBAJ7AgULc1r1PmH2C7Qr3prPsVl1g8XfUVbeceBVSz mbg2i2H1xod/7CN7McifWi7k2bOY5PHl87EKizMaW9fF6NgDANu9aay1QpEOR8f4dBReeCno tE+yQXipQrU4zjuUH6SXi6MTQQeuawnV/UwP6j/xq421q1sTaV/c+tKJmG/4gZb9/ELhAQUK dwyEIJ8kxN/czfKP3zefJrzBfcFMjX6ANwH5zptJoq8if8PqI6QBSPjgO7pBXeKTp1MCAwEA AaOBujCBtzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMFYGCWCGSAGG+EIBDQRJFkdUbyBnZXQgeW91ciBvd24g Y2VydGlmaWNhdGUgZm9yIEZSRUUgaGVhZCBvdmVyIHRvIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuQ0FjZXJ0Lm9y ZzAyBggrBgEFBQcBAQQmMCQwIgYIKwYBBQUHMAGGFmh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNhY2VydC5vcmcw GwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQYnJpYW5AZGVsaW5rLm5ldDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAgEACr1DJHD0 CedhJbsn8CaHE4CPzfcbEdLzxBLbZjhRKwQQ3eoc+WDRRj+OFckcCM1tcuSdH6+5SmcStfsb dJEFeZwso4XYtLqhQVL9Hx7jB7F4jQYYDHM8jx8vYtYGN66DES35TxCagwPWepTqzolGrISm Xz+fXc6bbLkLYmSADDjr68bMHHJxlgFj4bqE3lXMy6qOwz6gWJCzuRHCKFbF0qv73T8Df10y Hy+htkG7c2X9IFV1/iHNwebBjGMNfw+prLBrPLL/RO+0qzI14+9mHV+PWUuZsTHWeONE8BDH NvSPbOaHNXGrzhxfviuwbGheI/DOLIw7cbDR7hQjU7nR8R5sSdpTnYNrAjI7c+Or/pT+uo4Z WhcrjvPZkLTgP3471sWeWFvf20hS2a2CxPeZtVIej9+ahfhxrCdyZ5Ar2b10DaYYyUTBh4Jm kSIbI83OaUD0UPfcC0+ty/DIowusrlFnVbd80sqdTI44+YtnMFfRfZ8bD1zlLAI6b29eRH75 UOEvB/WN9x8pL163LT5Fwsn0GyKDrOmmP9f/naukWRgndVLhZRCgU1Vsl1Z8J5k9t3V9Z0D+ SdPvtQUibRe6VHmdV3nN0t5RnirLM69YJbvEI+YL9GS6446gmj8lJWDPh5lQToQpCz6Em9nx 833WKJDwPj7aHNJpE6HEn7AElv8wggc9MIIFJaADAgECAgEAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMHkx EDAOBgNVBAoTB1Jvb3QgQ0ExHjAcBgNVBAsTFWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzEiMCAG A1UEAxMZQ0EgQ2VydCBTaWduaW5nIEF1dGhvcml0eTEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSc3VwcG9y dEBjYWNlcnQub3JnMB4XDTAzMDMzMDEyMjk0OVoXDTMzMDMyOTEyMjk0OVoweTEQMA4GA1UE ChMHUm9vdCBDQTEeMBwGA1UECxMVaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnMSIwIAYDVQQDExlD QSBDZXJ0IFNpZ25pbmcgQXV0aG9yaXR5MSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJzdXBwb3J0QGNhY2Vy dC5vcmcwggIiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4ICDwAwggIKAoICAQDOIsDiRn3sNigHUJbyoDNA jEvxO2Y/MeVrAjbb1nz28YiPTnc2BUGV+QnwEs9GhnNgt25+6MBYZK7NsK1FFwxj+mcK6NbS vz7nmMTwTPrgA7s1XWwh3p4g2brNZjI3cvr3CPXHzVjJjucOXuo+/hyhFAoVbIaEW2RmKnqp S1N59Yiie+4vCmErjbJ+TValE+zq2pKerERBHlhgZQVm+MBEvcuU90J+C/dlaJhRBfDzBZEE HRsXguzIV7vDa3qI8bByzCVbIJHsFgISjzLpFxhI0McFLgIwQrglnAVrP6o6p+tTSPfo0rYH mNwbxjR/f8kcgnoFWCsIW/M4oqsXXWbJmNeeEIui0t10mvdxDHJg381vmDOdljR2PiR6krAO lR5v5qBFOEeq10HtSrcS9tcbg4oPLtgJtlnXqgT/0pN9aC7di0urWLovjeqVp6DDVIml+9uL USKdssO+Eb4skYaLlnitINOKLxo/xtBRZYchsRkBZX9FHIf1fNBBTE8pmCH9Mx91DARR+hl3 29QUHO6Bwx31mLdpBpEi3QBQzIExrBIHezjaaFvmK9R+yV+t6OtyTPMB5Usgv5qmV8qRAAGL oXUhN7VjDWc+Rk9wIGfOxdZZ2wLg8NLLzbpit5BB6N0g5Cm8ZClCyCLceJr/Q+yYGwlRS1pa wnHxxMtzqeWhCwIDAQABo4IBzjCCAcowHQYDVR0OBBYEFBa1MhvUx/Pg5o7zvdKwOu6yORjR MIGjBgNVHSMEgZswgZiAFBa1MhvUx/Pg5o7zvdKwOu6yORjRoX2kezB5MRAwDgYDVQQKEwdS b290IENBMR4wHAYDVQQLExVodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNhY2VydC5vcmcxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUNBIENl cnQgU2lnbmluZyBBdXRob3JpdHkxITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEnN1cHBvcnRAY2FjZXJ0Lm9y Z4IBADAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MDIGA1UdHwQrMCkwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNh Y2VydC5vcmcvcmV2b2tlLmNybDAwBglghkgBhvhCAQQEIxYhaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0 Lm9yZy9yZXZva2UuY3JsMDQGCWCGSAGG+EIBCAQnFiVodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNhY2VydC5vcmcv aW5kZXgucGhwP2lkPTEwMFYGCWCGSAGG+EIBDQRJFkdUbyBnZXQgeW91ciBvd24gY2VydGlm aWNhdGUgZm9yIEZSRUUgaGVhZCBvdmVyIHRvIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQQFAAOCAgEAKMfunIICulyAEso1Ch2Bb4lqmczyaA9/p+GNWJU+vfIGw5BarLVg 9plDAaOIcJydYp2kh69nWA0wNjvmrUjTy3QChnE+4isDaPE0YkBGO1PqKPSs+2aVU4pNXf07 2WDXynlpO7FlkqbGgYJcnM3rTQGKpd8RVaoVyh83wIKYcGHbanyWo44uVD5PIamQ79yCv9zo Ra1NkHMIPJRlsASZdn/ivMJqFaqXBDck2B6UTm0OUb7WxI/Klm33Q9/oMGUnO3u7Q0NjxEP3 suxozOEZjiL7mOF7Wj4BNzuLCLCi85VOGsubzZqx27Jw8C1K29iw429FSDMS//48MipU98T3 ivCII8JH/mR6ccDRHqZjsAd+pC/TAY/cnyu2xgipD5NIJfwS/Z9C3PPEPvZXsNfdadEGdzQK S9LKoP8cxozJFr7EzDI3aHNfCPtR90lTNgUKlQJM8nkaEPbYOnWc8x3xog1wZ4Ybsxb1L+Wk 63mG+T0LwnMLpZmsb/xnuOUvC6YYJI170Ug1KRhArJNg4ZaGULR6WdiPIQufz4KRxju/a9wH kbmXViOqtmyUxkgGPOTOTqrk9i8J3FNvLvx06zpjmcKmrIm8p7JEoA2KEONs8iTL+pufcEcu 3hSL1LIgCZaiZPEkHNyhNZwVstS8VS59BvWcDlX0WtaT2natJXNMxUMxggJcMIICWAIBATCB gDB5MRAwDgYDVQQKEwdSb290IENBMR4wHAYDVQQLExVodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNhY2VydC5vcmcx IjAgBgNVBAMTGUNBIENlcnQgU2lnbmluZyBBdXRob3JpdHkxITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEnN1 cHBvcnRAY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZwIDAbYjMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCggbEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqG SIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwMTAzMjMxMjEwWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU xeVi/qReSzx/o+QSLW2DIcTQLdwwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggq hkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAnAU2R20HlrsQKq3NqEazc5uFTolG6dgEiIoWdGujCty8Ct9XxD63 qQ7h1C+KLqAImZKZZ+OO3RCd5AlE9FV8sWSSbp2ItnkU2ThGMSycOxiZHgYk/pIwGarEDfBN qg3uytu3fxCNSVGz06BFY51vIjs/HDKL7a2rnqtwDE1pd9R0tFusxOc7u0ygK/FDxEcfuVZJ 2O8smNNLcMaZFRCrubyHP6Ptp05noxRrEo6cosO7tdjSlPTHQgEZxgxQPgQiTqbQML2XsWgg sP9oGHqaO0kgj7L4VgGPdPoevZke18+6RpEZkvQU3EaOLSZ89AaQrayr6SM2sHaj3mEyZJc9 dA== --1AtvaQRkIQxkm1Oe-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 23:04:08 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 60669 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 23:02:57 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO smtp.zedemail.net) (204.209.44.218) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 23:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12851 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 23:02:12 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) (204.209.44.218) by smtp.zedemail.net with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 23:02:12 -0000 Subject: Re: realrcptto patch question From: Blair Lowe To: ed Cc: Peter Gutbrod , qmail In-Reply-To: <20051229214920.5ab943a1@workstation> References: <1135795057.3567.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051229214920.5ab943a1@workstation> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:04:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1136329449.3912.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 21:49 +0000, ed wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:37:37 -0700 > Blair Lowe wrote: > > > What about a secondary mail server with an > > empty /etc/qmail/control/virtualdomains. > > > > Will the realrcptto still queue up email when the primary server goes > > down, or will all mail be rejected because there are no users on that > > mailserver? > > > > This question would also apply to goodrcpttp and badrcptto. > > Whats wrong with the validrcptto patch > [http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml]? Then you can > distribute the validrcptto.cdb file among your mail servers, maintained > on a single server, and some scp kung fu. > Thanks, I'll look at that. Would I drop realrcptto patch, or be able to have both? Ideally I want to speed up the server, and also kill spam as it is getting quite heavy of late. scp kung fu sounds like a good plan: just hope my server tai chi will help me not pull security muscles ;) TTYL, Blair. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 23:41:54 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 8738 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 23:41:32 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO smtp.zedemail.net) (204.209.44.218) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 23:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 13211 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 23:41:03 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) (204.209.44.218) by smtp.zedemail.net with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 23:41:03 -0000 Subject: [Fwd: Re: realrcptto patch question] From: Blair Lowe To: ed Cc: Peter Gutbrod , qmail Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:41:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1136331715.3912.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Blair Lowe > To: ed > Cc: Peter Gutbrod , qmail > Subject: Re: realrcptto patch question > Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:04:08 -0700 > On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 21:49 +0000, ed wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:37:37 -0700 > > Blair Lowe wrote: > > > > > What about a secondary mail server with an > > > empty /etc/qmail/control/virtualdomains. > > > > > > Will the realrcptto still queue up email when the primary server goes > > > down, or will all mail be rejected because there are no users on that > > > mailserver? > > > > > > This question would also apply to goodrcpttp and badrcptto. > > > > Whats wrong with the validrcptto patch > > [http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml]? Then you can > > distribute the validrcptto.cdb file among your mail servers, maintained > > on a single server, and some scp kung fu. > > > > Thanks, > I'll look at that. > > Would I drop realrcptto patch, or be able to have both? > > Ideally I want to speed up the server, and also kill spam as it is > getting quite heavy of late. > > scp kung fu sounds like a good plan: just hope my server tai chi will > help me not pull security muscles ;) > > TTYL, > Blair. Also, I use vmailmgr, so I assume I'd have to rewrite the mkvalidrcptto script for that? Has anyone out there done this? TTYL, Blair. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 01:29:08 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 22643 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 01:22:24 -0000 Received: from reserved.ablehost.com (HELO pamc.e3ft.com) (205.145.128.178) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 01:22:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 4147 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 01:21:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dtapc) (127.0.0.1) by pamc.e3ft.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 01:21:55 -0000 From: "David T. Ashley" To: Subject: OT: Using qmail List Posts to Enhance Search Engine Rankings Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:29:08 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Question: I know that some search engines use the total number of links to a site as a clue about its usefulness. Would including links in a footer used in mailing list posts enhance search engine rankings? Conjectured mechanism: a)Spider crawls mailing list archives via HTTP, finds links, isn't smart enough to realize that this is a mailing list post. b)Statistics for number of sites/pages linking to site is enhanced. Thanks, Dave. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 02:49:56 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 21196 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 02:50:25 -0000 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (64.233.162.200) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 02:50:25 -0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 4so2982388nzn for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:49:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=WLDa3MSCM+S7EqHb2PTqPsITDABVBAQDQL3uqXKkDA1WC1z0hcGi51ssJPqelcE2dTKHTj8l9G7bDn/s7BLXXq6elVSULAGnGV302/XD5Ld1s+WKi+RbtFe6yB1FE3GsvqgwhqOQacFxRr7VFrLl+CfeDE1Glj6uCHrE6It1rnE= Received: by 10.36.222.77 with SMTP id u77mr4671306nzg; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.80.16 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:49:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2ad474000601031849n51ec9e2ep88d34ad932f62eae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:49:56 +1100 From: ".." To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Spamcontrol rejecting all mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_11366_30716478.1136342996503" ------=_Part_11366_30716478.1136342996503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Running Freebsd 6.0 with qmail 1.03 under tcpserver. No problems in the pas= t runinng several virtual domains. Run spamcontrol install without issue except I now get all mail rejected (including virtuals) with message "Reject: RCPT::Failed_Recptto.... Recipients files are in place. I've read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply can no= t get this to work properly. I've also try validrcptto and get the same. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ------=_Part_11366_30716478.1136342996503 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Running Freebsd 6.0 with qmail 1.03 under tcpserver. No problems in th= e past runinng several virtual domains. Run spamcontrol install without iss= ue except I now get all mail rejected (including virtuals) with messag= e=20
"Reject: RCPT::Failed_Recptto....
Recipients files are in place. 
I've read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply c= an not get this to work properly.
 
I've also try validrcptto and get the same.
 
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
 
------=_Part_11366_30716478.1136342996503-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 04:05:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 7142 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 04:06:20 -0000 Received: from smtp.gfn.org (HELO gfn.org) (205.145.130.34) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 04:06:20 -0000 X-Delivered-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: from gfn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0445kYP025983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:05:51 -0500 Received: (from swgsh@localhost) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.9/Submit) id k0445kTk025973; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:05:46 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gfn.org: swgsh set sender to sgifford@suspectclass.com using -f To: jared Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> From: Scott Gifford Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:05:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: (demottjar@yahoo.com's message of "Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:53:55 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 X-Scanned-By: milter-date/0.6.73 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:05:51 -0500 X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:05:51 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO jared writes: > Scott, > > Thanks for your kindness. Didn't work. Any guesses why? It's probably a permissions problem, then. Maybe qmail-smtpd doesn't have permission to write in the directory where it's running when it crashes? You'll have to poke around and see. ----Scott. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 06:16:22 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 47506 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 06:16:51 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 06:16:51 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6643167EC4 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:16:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 22:16:22 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: Mail queue problems. In-Reply-To: <20060103191427.GB7987@discworld.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20060103130958.E86346@pop.citytel.net> References: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> <20060103191427.GB7987@discworld.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Starting and stopping qmail-send should not have any beneficial effect on > sending of mail. If qmail-send is completely wedged, it's generally because > it's blocked waiting on its logger (disk full or similar). Otherwise, > stopping and re-starting qmail-send will just slow down mail throughput, as > qmail-send has to do a complete queue scan at stop and again at start. Ahh ok that make sense. Acutally I'm still getting used to the way qmail does things. I just installed qmail on a test server to see how it works. But installing a whack of patches just to do certain things is very confusing. I have to say in the last 4 yrs of using Postfix, and a few yrs of Sendmail before that, Qmail is certainly a different animal. This system uses 3 machines for incoming, outgoing and handling POP. The 3 machines NFS mount a couple of file systems from another machine and are delivering local mail to the NFS mounts. > > Most, if not all of the mails were <> null senders. > > Sounds like you got a storm of bounces; you may have been the victim of a joe > job, or perhaps there was a hole in your system (exploitable CGI script, bad > relaying permissions, etc) that allowed someone to abuse one of your servers > for sending spam, and you were seeing the splashback. Thats what I thought as well and its really bogging things down. My guess its just a joe-job, the systems seem to be locked down pretty well. It looks like this is a bit of a first judging by past MRTG graphs for these machines. Acutally Qmail on one machine keeps stopping which plays havoc as the 3 machines all have the same MX preference. > > called Overlord. Syslog is one line: > > There's one of your problems. qmail works so fast that it can cause syslog > to suck up 90%+ of your CPU. Change your qmail-send configuration to log > through multilog instead of splogger->syslog. Then your qmail-send logs will > be separate and easily analyzable. Acutally my mistake. 8057 p0 S 0:17.14 /usr/local/bin/multilog t n100 s1000000 8064 p0 S 0:05.70 /usr/local/bin/multilog t n100 s1000000 8066 p0 S 0:01.13 /usr/local/bin/multilog t n100 s1000000 multilog is running three different log files. Now to find a log analyzer and get some stats out of them and see whats going on. Thanks, Keith From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 08:52:35 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 16083 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 08:53:06 -0000 Received: from smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (195.188.213.4) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 08:53:06 -0000 Received: from router.base ([82.38.184.30]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:53:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 14096 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2006 08:52:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO andrew.office) (10.20.80.77) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 08:52:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 5288 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2006 08:52:35 -0000 From: Andrew Richards To: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: Mail queue problems. Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:52:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> <20060103191427.GB7987@discworld.dyndns.org> <20060103130958.E86346@pop.citytel.net> In-Reply-To: <20060103130958.E86346@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601040852.35525.ar-djblists@nwdb.co.uk> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2006 08:53:36.0096 (UTC) FILETIME=[593B0E00:01C6110C] On Wednesday 04 January 2006 06:16, Keith Woodworth wrote: > multilog is running three different log files. Now to find a log > analyzer and get some stats out of them and see whats going on. Checkout the the tools on www.qmail.org - I suggest starting with qmailanalog (see comments re. converting timestamps from multilog format) and mrtg. cheers, Andrew. -- ====================================================================== Network Design & Build http://www.nwdb.co.uk/ * Custom email solutions * Systems Administration * Networking ====================================================================== From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 10:17:12 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 98569 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 10:08:35 -0000 Received: from hamburg134.server4you.de (HELO mail.fehcom.net) (217.172.188.134) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 10:08:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14087 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 10:08:09 -0000 Received: from xdsl-81-173-227-246.netcologne.de (HELO mail.fehnet.de) (erwin@81.173.227.246) by hamburg134 with ESMTPA; 4 Jan 2006 10:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32379 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 10:08:23 -0000 Received: from dornroeschen.fehnet.de (HELO dornroeschen.fehcom.de) (erwin@192.168.192.19) by orion.fehnet.de with ESMTPA; 4 Jan 2006 10:08:23 -0000 Message-Id: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> X-Sender: erwin@orion.fehnet.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:17:12 +0100 To: ".." ,qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: Erwin Hoffmann Subject: Re: Spamcontrol rejecting all mail In-Reply-To: <2ad474000601031849n51ec9e2ep88d34ad932f62eae@mail.gmail.co m> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hi, At 13:49 04.01.2006 +1100, .. wrote: >Running Freebsd 6.0 with qmail 1.03 under tcpserver. No problems in the >past runinng several virtual domains. Run spamcontrol install without >issue except I now get all mail rejected (including virtuals) with message >"Reject: RCPT::Failed_Recptto.... >Recipients files are in place. >I've read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply can >not get this to work properly. The least you should do would is to post the output of "qmail-showctl". regards. --eh. Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/ Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:05:35 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 91182 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:08:09 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:08:09 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu8MU-0001FZ-BF for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:07:30 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:07:30 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:07:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:05:35 -0500 Lines: 113 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I said it was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd start life as root and than drop to the user qmaild? If so, I think you're right, I believe the linux kernel will not let such a process dump core. I've been doing some googling and supposedly there's a sysctl option to set the key "kernel.core_setuid_ok =1", but my systems don't have that key. (I have redhat (2.4.20) and FC (2.6.12)) U. George wrote: > technically, u cannot get core dumps no matter what. There is a security > issue with dumping system programs, and programs that belong to other > folks. > > If the program is EXEC only, then u *not* gonna get a dump. > > If u have permission ( i suppose u need at least read permission ), then > a "ulimit -c unlimited" would better suit your purpose. 1024 blocks is > just 512kb ( maybe a meg if your blocksize is 1024bytes/block ). > > And from reading the kernel code there are more ( interesting ) issues > with creating the core file: > > file = filp_open(corename, O_CREAT | 2 | O_NOFOLLOW | > O_LARGEFILE, 0600); > > if (IS_ERR(file)) > > goto fail_unlock; > > inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode; > > if (inode->i_nlink > 1) > > goto close_fail; /* multiple links - don't > dump */ > > if (d_unhashed(file->f_dentry)) > > goto close_fail; > > > > if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) > > goto close_fail; > > if (!file->f_op) > > goto close_fail; > > if (!file->f_op->write) > > goto close_fail; > > if (do_truncate(file->f_dentry, 0) != 0) > > goto close_fail; > > > > So if u cant open, is not a regular file, does not have write > permission, unable to truncate file, these also stop core dumps. > > changing user id's, and group id's also nullify a core dump. > > There are lots of reasons why. Which one. I can't always tell. But u > can, presuming u can rebuild the kernel, sprinkle printk calls at the > various points (fs/exec.c:do_codedump() ). U should do this on a system > that you can play with. > > And once u know why, u can fix it to always dump core. > > > FWIW, i have also not been too successfull in getting dumps when I want. > Sometimes this is a "good thing"(tm) ;-} > > > jared wrote: > > Scott, > > > > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. > > Can you give me an example on how this could be done? > > > > Thanks, > > Jared > > > > Scott Gifford wrote: > > > >> Peter Samuel writes: > >> > >> > >>> Quoting jared : > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hmm...thanks. I'll give that a try. But it doesn't really answer > >>>> the question. Does anyone know how to get core dumps on Linux no > >>>> matter what? > >>> > >>> > >>> Use your shell's builtin ulimit command. This is on FC4 using bash as > >>> the shell > >>> > >>> [peters@localhost ~]$ type ulimit > >>> ulimit is a shell builtin > >> > >> > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > >>> If you wish to have this set permanently, modify /etc/profile > >>> accordingly (that's where it is set in FC4, your system may be > >>> different). > >> > >> > >> > >> Putting an appropriate ulimit command in your qmail-smtpd run file > >> should allow you to enable core dumps for qmail-smtpd and its children > >> without affecting the rest of the system. > >> > >> -----Scott. > >> > > > > > > > > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:06:34 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 96979 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:11:07 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:11:07 -0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu8PA-000224-BN for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:10:16 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:10:16 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:10:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:06:34 -0500 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news Doesn't it run from /var/qmail/bin? I set that to 777 and still no dump. Scott Gifford wrote: > jared writes: > > >>Scott, >> >>Thanks for your kindness. Didn't work. Any guesses why? > > > It's probably a permissions problem, then. Maybe qmail-smtpd doesn't > have permission to write in the directory where it's running when it > crashes? You'll have to poke around and see. > > ----Scott. > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:23:09 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 10881 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:24:15 -0000 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com (205.158.62.125) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:24:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3439 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.17?) (feizhou@graffiti.net@218.250.212.123) by pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:23:15 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:23:09 +0800 From: Feizhou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Qmail List' Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jared wrote: > See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I said it > was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd start life as > root and than drop to the user qmaild? If so, I think you're right, I > believe the linux kernel will not let such a process dump core. I've > been doing some googling and supposedly there's a sysctl option to set > the key "kernel.core_setuid_ok =1", but my systems don't have that key. > (I have redhat (2.4.20) and FC (2.6.12)) Great, now you know more about core dumps under a Linux based operating system. Do you HAVE to get a core dump? What is wrong with trying to debug your modified qmail-smtpd with gdb? I don't bother trying to get a core dump for my buggy programs. Just recompile with -ggdb3 and run them under gdb and then give myself a smack :) From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:29:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 20308 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:30:34 -0000 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com (205.158.62.125) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:30:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 10118 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:29:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.17?) (feizhou@graffiti.net@218.250.212.123) by pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:29:38 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBCDC0.7020602@graffiti.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:29:36 +0800 From: Feizhou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Qmail List' Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103154823.q71ptuydc0okwk0w@www.gormand.com.au> <20060103163336.qg6gieh4gsg8g4ww@www.gormand.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jared wrote: > Doesn't it run from /var/qmail/bin? I set that to 777 and still no dump. > ??? I'd imagine under /service if you are using daemontools.... From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:48:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 45114 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:48:55 -0000 Received: from pool-68-161-47-207.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (68.161.47.207) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:48:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 3754 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:40:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:40:49 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBD224.2030507@gatworks.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:48:20 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I saw that also, but dont know if that sys-call is priv'd . Even if u can set it, that would be only one flag of many that you have overcome. u still have to have ulimit -c ######, writable core, permissions, .... all the requirements in the core dump routine. At one time core dumps littered the unix file system. i guess i dont understand. the over-ride i saw was in 2.6.10. on one hand u have: > if (current->euid == current->uid && current->egid == current->gid) > current->mm->dumpable = 1; and then flag is taken away: > if (bprm->e_uid != current->euid || bprm->e_gid != current->egid || > permission(bprm->file->f_dentry->d_inode,MAY_READ, NULL) || > (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP)) { > suid_keys(current); > current->mm->dumpable = 0; > } And then to have the user get/set flag ( in kernel/sys.c:sys_prctl() ) : > case PR_GET_DUMPABLE: > if (current->mm->dumpable) > error = 1; > break; > case PR_SET_DUMPABLE: > if (arg2 != 0 && arg2 != 1) { > error = -EINVAL; > break; > } > current->mm->dumpable = arg2; > break; BTW: all this appears to be really off-topic. Just want to let u know just in case u thought this was a kernel discuss list. Good Luck. jared wrote: > See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I said it > was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd start life as > root and than drop to the user qmaild? If so, I think you're right, I > believe the linux kernel will not let such a process dump core. I've > been doing some googling and supposedly there's a sysctl option to set > the key "kernel.core_setuid_ok =1", but my systems don't have that key. > (I have redhat (2.4.20) and FC (2.6.12)) > > > > U. George wrote: > >> technically, u cannot get core dumps no matter what. There is a security >> issue with dumping system programs, and programs that belong to other >> folks. >> >> If the program is EXEC only, then u *not* gonna get a dump. >> >> If u have permission ( i suppose u need at least read permission ), then >> a "ulimit -c unlimited" would better suit your purpose. 1024 blocks is >> just 512kb ( maybe a meg if your blocksize is 1024bytes/block ). >> >> And from reading the kernel code there are more ( interesting ) issues >> with creating the core file: >> > file = filp_open(corename, O_CREAT | 2 | O_NOFOLLOW | >> O_LARGEFILE, 0600); >> > if (IS_ERR(file)) >> > goto fail_unlock; >> > inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode; >> > if (inode->i_nlink > 1) >> > goto close_fail; /* multiple links - don't >> dump */ >> > if (d_unhashed(file->f_dentry)) >> > goto close_fail; >> > >> > if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) >> > goto close_fail; >> > if (!file->f_op) >> > goto close_fail; >> > if (!file->f_op->write) >> > goto close_fail; >> > if (do_truncate(file->f_dentry, 0) != 0) >> > goto close_fail; >> > >> >> So if u cant open, is not a regular file, does not have write >> permission, unable to truncate file, these also stop core dumps. >> >> changing user id's, and group id's also nullify a core dump. >> >> There are lots of reasons why. Which one. I can't always tell. But u >> can, presuming u can rebuild the kernel, sprinkle printk calls at the >> various points (fs/exec.c:do_codedump() ). U should do this on a system >> that you can play with. >> >> And once u know why, u can fix it to always dump core. >> >> >> FWIW, i have also not been too successfull in getting dumps when I want. >> Sometimes this is a "good thing"(tm) ;-} >> >> >> jared wrote: >> > Scott, >> > >> > Thanks. I tried that once before, but exec doesn't recognize ulimit. >> > Can you give me an example on how this could be done? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jared >> > >> > Scott Gifford wrote: >> > >> >> Peter Samuel writes: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Quoting jared : >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Hmm...thanks. I'll give that a try. But it doesn't really answer >> >>>> the question. Does anyone know how to get core dumps on Linux no >> >>>> matter what? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Use your shell's builtin ulimit command. This is on FC4 using >> bash as >> >>> the shell >> >>> >> >>> [peters@localhost ~]$ type ulimit >> >>> ulimit is a shell builtin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> >>> If you wish to have this set permanently, modify /etc/profile >> >>> accordingly (that's where it is set in FC4, your system may be >> >>> different). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Putting an appropriate ulimit command in your qmail-smtpd run file >> >> should allow you to enable core dumps for qmail-smtpd and its >> children >> >> without affecting the rest of the system. >> >> >> >> -----Scott. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 13:39:05 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 37938 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 13:42:17 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 13:42:17 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu8tP-00021F-JV for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:41:31 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:41:31 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:41:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:39:05 -0500 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news I my very first post I mentioned why I needed a core. Feizhou wrote: > jared wrote: > >> See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I said >> it was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd start life >> as root and than drop to the user qmaild? If so, I think you're >> right, I believe the linux kernel will not let such a process dump >> core. I've been doing some googling and supposedly there's a sysctl >> option to set the key "kernel.core_setuid_ok =1", but my systems don't >> have that key. (I have redhat (2.4.20) and FC (2.6.12)) > > > Great, now you know more about core dumps under a Linux based operating > system. Do you HAVE to get a core dump? > > What is wrong with trying to debug your modified qmail-smtpd with gdb? I > don't bother trying to get a core dump for my buggy programs. Just > recompile with -ggdb3 and run them under gdb and then give myself a > smack :) > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 14:20:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 86944 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:21:07 -0000 Received: from fiinbeck.math.ntnu.no (129.241.15.140) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:21:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 72684 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:20:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:20:36 -0000 Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:20:36 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20060104.152036.164069176.hanche@math.ntnu.no> To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump From: Harald Hanche-Olsen In-Reply-To: References: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 23.0.0 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit + jared : | See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I | said it was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd | start life as root and than drop to the user qmaild? Uh, I'm surprised nobody called you on that before. Maybe the noise level is too high - I haven't been following this thread, I just visited it now to see what all the hullaballoo is about. Be that as it may, there is only one suid program in the entire qmail family, and that is qmail-queue. (And it's suid qmailq, not suid root.) The only long-running daemon that runs as root is qmail-lspawn. qmail-smtpd usually runs as user qmaild. In the normal setup, tcpserver runs as root (so it can bind to port 25), then changes to qmaild before starting qmail-smtpd. + jared : | Doesn't it run from /var/qmail/bin? No, /var/qmail. Look in qmail-smtpd.c: void main() { sig_pipeignore(); if (chdir(auto_qmail) == -1) die_control(); Or if that is too much work, what about strace? (This is linux, if I recall correctly? You have strace?) $ strace -e trace=chdir /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd chdir("/var/qmail") = 0 220 decibel.pvv.ntnu.no ESMTP quit 221 decibel.pvv.ntnu.no - Harald From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 14:26:16 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 96058 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:27:13 -0000 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com (205.158.62.125) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:27:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 6590 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:26:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.17?) (feizhou@graffiti.net@218.250.212.123) by pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:26:18 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBDB08.9060008@graffiti.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:26:16 +0800 From: Feizhou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Qmail List' Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jared wrote: > I my very first post I mentioned why I needed a core. you cannot share a -ggdb3 enabled qmail-smtpd? Anyways, try making /var/qmail, or wherever you installed qmail, writable by qmail-smtpd's user if that is what you really want. qmail-smtpd will change directory to whereever conf-qmail instructs at compile time. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 14:48:45 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 22417 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:49:21 -0000 Received: from pool-68-161-47-207.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (68.161.47.207) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:49:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3837 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:41:16 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBE04D.1060508@gatworks.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:48:45 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jared wrote: > I my very first post I mentioned why I needed a core. I, myself, didnt read that post. But I think that the gdb suggest is a better way ( maybe ). 1) create the program with debug symbols. 2) run it as you would normally ( script or what ever ) 3) on another terminal,as root, locate the process id of the program you want to catch the core dump ( presuming that it didnt dump immediately ). 4) as root, run 'gdb program-to-debug PROCESS-ID" . gdb will attach the running program as if it was its own. 5) type in c ( to continue running ) . Program will continue running, but under the control of gdb. 6) wait for fault to happen. gdb will wake up when fault happens. 7) if this is a live q-mail system, then u might want to react fairly fast, as upset users tend to voice their fustrations at near the speed of light. ;-/ jared wrote: > I my very first post I mentioned why I needed a core. > > Feizhou wrote: >> >> What is wrong with trying to debug your modified qmail-smtpd with gdb? >> I don't bother trying to get a core dump for my buggy programs. Just >> recompile with -ggdb3 and run them under gdb and then give myself a >> smack :) >> > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 14:44:39 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 22092 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:48:58 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:48:58 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu9uo-0002Z0-S6 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:47:02 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:47:02 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:47:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:44:39 -0500 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <20060104.152036.164069176.hanche@math.ntnu.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20060104.152036.164069176.hanche@math.ntnu.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news You da man. If you make /var/qmail 777 (writable) qmail-smtpd will dump core. So scratch all that other effective id talk, it never changes it's id. Peace, Jared Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > + jared : > > | See that's what I was talking about in a previous message when I > | said it was "setuid". What I meant was that doesn't qmail-smptd > | start life as root and than drop to the user qmaild? > > Uh, I'm surprised nobody called you on that before. Maybe the noise > level is too high - I haven't been following this thread, I just > visited it now to see what all the hullaballoo is about. Be that as > it may, there is only one suid program in the entire qmail family, and > that is qmail-queue. (And it's suid qmailq, not suid root.) The only > long-running daemon that runs as root is qmail-lspawn. qmail-smtpd > usually runs as user qmaild. In the normal setup, tcpserver runs as > root (so it can bind to port 25), then changes to qmaild before > starting qmail-smtpd. > > + jared : > > | Doesn't it run from /var/qmail/bin? > > No, /var/qmail. Look in qmail-smtpd.c: > > void main() > { > sig_pipeignore(); > if (chdir(auto_qmail) == -1) die_control(); > > Or if that is too much work, what about strace? > (This is linux, if I recall correctly? You have strace?) > > $ strace -e trace=chdir /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > chdir("/var/qmail") = 0 > 220 decibel.pvv.ntnu.no ESMTP > quit > 221 decibel.pvv.ntnu.no > > - Harald > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 15:06:38 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 46687 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 15:07:38 -0000 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com (205.158.62.125) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 15:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 18041 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 15:06:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.17?) (feizhou@graffiti.net@218.250.212.123) by pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 15:06:42 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBE47E.3030804@graffiti.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:06:38 +0800 From: Feizhou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Qmail List' Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <20060104.152036.164069176.hanche@math.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jared wrote: > You da man. If you make /var/qmail 777 (writable) qmail-smtpd will dump > core. So scratch all that other effective id talk, it never changes > it's id. > > Peace, Until you get some nice stuff under /var/qmail. Have you heard of kernel exploits where local users get themselves root privileges? Enjoy your core dumping. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 15:10:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 52986 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 15:11:18 -0000 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com (205.158.62.125) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 15:11:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 22287 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 15:10:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.17?) (feizhou@graffiti.net@218.250.212.123) by pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 15:10:22 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBE55C.8010009@graffiti.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:10:20 +0800 From: Feizhou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Qmail List' Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> <43BBE04D.1060508@gatworks.com> In-Reply-To: <43BBE04D.1060508@gatworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > But I think that the gdb suggest is a better way ( maybe ). > 1) create the program with debug symbols. > 2) run it as you would normally ( script or what ever ) I'd rather run it under gdb itself. gdb qmail-smtpd to get into the gdb shell and then execute qmail-smtpd. > 6) wait for fault to happen. gdb will wake up when fault happens. Simulate a smtp session. helo dude, blah blah blah. Why expose a buggy program to others? From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 14:57:42 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 35180 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 14:59:29 -0000 Received: from mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au (211.29.133.167) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 14:59:29 -0000 Received: from c21729 (c211-28-115-84.eburwd4.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.115.84]) by mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id k04EwqYU022723; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:58:54 +1100 Reply-To: From: "Michael" To: "'Erwin Hoffmann'" Cc: Subject: Re: Spamcontrol rejecting all mail Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:57:42 +1100 Message-ID: <000101c6113f$585d01e0$0a00a8c0@eburwd2.vic.optusnet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 At 13:49 04.01.2006 +1100, .. wrote: >Running Freebsd 6.0 with qmail 1.03 under tcpserver. No problems in the past runinng several virtual domains. Run spamcontrol install without issue except I >now get all mail rejected (including virtuals) with message >"Reject: RCPT::Failed_Recptto.... >Recipients files are in place. >I've read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply can not get this to work properly. The least you should do would is to post the output of "qmail-showctl". regards. --eh. I have changed over to Outlook as it appears Gmail & the list are not very compatible. I hope the following is better than the garbled mess that comes back from the list with gmail. Thank you for your response and my apologies for leaving off some information to begin with. qmail-showctl follows. I disabled the badmailfrom to limit the output. qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 120. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 81, 82, 83, 0, 84, 85, 86, 87. group ids: 81, 82. authsenders: (Default.) No authenticated SMTP senders. badhelo: (Default.) Any HELO/EHLO greeting is allowed. badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. badloadertypes: (Default.) Any loader types are accepted. badloadertypes.cdb: (Default.) No effect. badmimetypes: (Default.) Any MIME types are accepted. badmimetypes.cdb: (Default.) No effect. badrcptto: (Default.) Any RCPT TO is allowed. bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is theguru.abcd.com.au. bouncemaxbytes: Bounce size limit is 2500 bytes. concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10. concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote concurrency is 20. databytes: SMTP DATA limit is 2000000 bytes. defaultdomain: Default domain name is abcd.com.au. defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is theguru.abcd.com.au. doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: theguru.abcd.com.au. doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is theguru.abcd.com.au. helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is theguru.abcd.com.au. idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is theguru.abcd.com.au. localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes theguru.abcd.com.au. locals: Messages for localhost are delivered locally. Messages for localhost.abcd.com.au are delivered locally. Messages for michae34.lnk.telstra.net are delivered locally. Messages for TheGuru.abcd.com.au are delivered locally. Messages for theguru.abcd.com.au are delivered locally. Messages for ns.abcd.com.au are delivered locally. Messages for mail.abcd.com.au are delivered locally. Messages for michael are delivered locally. me: My name is theguru.abcd.com.au. moreipme: (Default.) No additional IP addresses are me. notipme: (Default.) All of my IP addresses are me. percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. plusdomain: Plus domain name is abcd.com.au. qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds. rcpthosts: SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at localhost. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at michae34.lnk.telstra.net. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at TheGuru.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at theguru.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at ns.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at mail.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at nardella.com. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at nardella.com.au . SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at nard.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at pro-motion.com. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at oepmg.org.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at nardella.biz. morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. recipients: SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in /users/recipients.cdb. SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in /users/nardella.com.cdb. SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in /users/nardella.com.au.cdb. smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 theguru.abcd.com.au. smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. virtualdomains: Virtual domain: nardella.com:nardella.com Virtual domain: oepmg.org.au:oepmg Virtual domain: nardella.com.au:nardella.com Virtual domain: nardella.biz:nardella.com Virtual domain: nard.com.au:nardella.com Virtual domain: pro-motion.com:nardella.com tarpitcount: Actual Tarpitcount: 5. tarpitdelay: Actual Tarpitdelay: 10. defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. badmailfrom.bak: I have no idea what this file does. concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does. recipients.cdb: I have no idea what this file does. validrcptto.cdb: I have no idea what this file does. validrcptto: I have no idea what this file does. - - - Thanks Michael -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.11/219 - Release Date: 2/01/2006 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 15:15:23 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 63185 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 15:17:53 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 15:17:53 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EuAO1-00024i-7G for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:17:13 +0100 Received: from c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([24.11.54.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:17:13 +0100 Received: from demottjar by c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:17:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: jared Subject: Re: qmail core dump Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:15:23 -0500 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <20060104.152036.164069176.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <43BBE47E.3030804@graffiti.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-11-54-76.hsd1.mi.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <43BBE47E.3030804@graffiti.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news Thanks. This is a test system not connected to anything, so don't fear. Thanks all! ps the ulimit at the top of run scripts was also needed. Feizhou wrote: > jared wrote: > >> You da man. If you make /var/qmail 777 (writable) qmail-smtpd will >> dump core. So scratch all that other effective id talk, it never >> changes it's id. >> >> Peace, > > > Until you get some nice stuff under /var/qmail. Have you heard of kernel > exploits where local users get themselves root privileges? > > Enjoy your core dumping. > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 16:28:39 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 37298 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 16:21:52 -0000 Received: from mail.tibonline.net (HELO ns1.tibonline.net) (12.21.237.6) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 16:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6222 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 16:21:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aspen) (12.21.237.36) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 16:21:23 -0000 From: "Kirti S. Bajwa" To: Subject: Special symbals in email address??? Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:28:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0052_01C61122.056A7160" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Disposition-Notification-To: "Kirti S. Bajwa" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C61122.056A7160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello List: RH 9, qmail-1.05 We are going to outsource our dial-in services. Presently, when we setup an account, we use UID/PW combination. When we outsource the dial-in services, we are supposed to use the email address as UID. For example; my UID is 'kbajwa', the new UID (for outsource) is 'kbajwa@tibonline.net'. However when try adding the UID of 'kbajwa@tibonline.net', I get an error message "The user name 'kbajwa@tibonline.net" contains punctuation characters. Please do not use punctuation in the user name.". What is the solution? It may be LINUX problem. If it is, then, what qmail users suggest I should do? FYI, I am soon planning to switch from RH Linux to CentOS. I can easily setup qmail on a CestOS server if that will solve the problem. Thank you for any suggestion! Kirti ------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C61122.056A7160 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Special symbals in email address???

Hello = List:

RH 9, = qmail-1.05

We = are going to outsource our dial-in services. Presently, when we setup an = account, we use UID/PW combination. When we outsource the dial-in services, we are supposed = to use the email address as UID.

For = example; my UID is ‘kbajwa’, the new UID (for outsource) is ‘kbajwa@tibonline.net’. However = when = try adding the UID of ‘kbajwa@tibonline.net’, I get an error = message = “The user name ‘kbajwa@tibonline.net” = contains = punctuation characters. Please do not use punctuation in the user = name.”. What is the solution?

It = may be LINUX problem. If it is, then, what qmail users suggest I should do?

FYI, = I am soon planning to switch from RH Linux to CentOS. I can easily setup qmail on a CestOS server if = that will solve the problem.

Thank = you for any suggestion!

Kirti

------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C61122.056A7160-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 17:11:50 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 97544 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 17:12:28 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 17:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 3396 invoked by uid 227); 4 Jan 2006 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.027711 secs); 04 Jan 2006 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 04 Jan 2006 17:11:57 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Special symbals in email address??? Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:11:50 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2318969.lbaPXkYeOE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601040911.55684.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart2318969.lbaPXkYeOE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 04 January 2006 08:28, you wrote: > Hello List: > > RH 9, qmail-1.05 > > We are going to outsource our dial-in services. Presently, when we setup > an account, we use UID/PW combination. When we outsource the dial-in > services, we are supposed to use the email address as UID. ok. > For example; my UID is 'kbajwa', the new UID (for outsource) is > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net'. However when try adding the UID of > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net', I get an error message "The user name > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net" contains punctuation characters. Please do not > use punctuation in the user name.". What is the solution? adding the UID to what? doesn't sound like a qmail problem to me, but you= =20 have a lot going on in this email and haven't been very specific. > It may be LINUX problem. If it is, then, what qmail users suggest I > should do? > > FYI, I am soon planning to switch from RH Linux to CentOS. I can easily > setup qmail on a CestOS server if that will solve the problem. you do realize that centos IS redhat, correct? =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart2318969.lbaPXkYeOE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDvAHbyBTJv0gb9+IRAvLlAKCZt9Q+PCZJnmplhUR8VWN0hu3+fACgp7mF mT5Msn88MNIxH7K8ZU61H1E= =GO0d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2318969.lbaPXkYeOE-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 18:24:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 70234 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 18:18:12 -0000 Received: from mail.tibonline.net (HELO ns1.tibonline.net) (12.21.237.6) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 18:18:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 27981 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 18:17:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aspen) (12.21.237.36) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 18:17:43 -0000 From: "Kirti S. Bajwa" To: Subject: RE: Special symbals in email address??? Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:24:36 -0500 Message-ID: <00ba01c6115c$215686e0$24ed150c@tib.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <200601040911.55684.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 >> adding the UID to what? When I add a new user, that's when UID, Password & user name are added to the system. >> you do realize that centos IS redhat, correct? Yes. Kirti -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:kitchen@scriptkitchen.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 12:12 PM To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Special symbals in email address??? > For example; my UID is 'kbajwa', the new UID (for outsource) is > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net'. However when try adding the UID of > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net', I get an error message "The user name > 'kbajwa@tibonline.net" contains punctuation characters. Please do not > use punctuation in the user name.". What is the solution? adding the UID to what? doesn't sound like a qmail problem to me, but you have a lot going on in this email and haven't been very specific. > It may be LINUX problem. If it is, then, what qmail users suggest I > should do? > > FYI, I am soon planning to switch from RH Linux to CentOS. I can easily > setup qmail on a CestOS server if that will solve the problem. you do realize that centos IS redhat, correct? -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 16:35:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 52863 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 16:36:20 -0000 Received: from pool-68-161-47-207.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (68.161.47.207) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 16:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 3947 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 16:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 16:28:15 -0000 Message-ID: <43BBF962.6050007@gatworks.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:35:46 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail core dump References: <43B3F26E.1010302@graffiti.net> <20051229140902.zfxszqxmv408w84s@www.gormand.com.au> <43BAF7A8.2030109@gatworks.com> <43BBCC3D.60106@graffiti.net> <43BBE04D.1060508@gatworks.com> <43BBE55C.8010009@graffiti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lots of programs fork() off, and detach. Lots of programs are piped. There are many reasons why that process is very appropriate. I suppose, the person who is dealing with this issue, is already dealing with a buggy program. and can either recreate the issue as a simulation, if at all possible, or has to be done in real-time. Feizhou wrote: > >> But I think that the gdb suggest is a better way ( maybe ). >> 1) create the program with debug symbols. >> 2) run it as you would normally ( script or what ever ) > > > I'd rather run it under gdb itself. gdb qmail-smtpd to get into the gdb > shell and then execute qmail-smtpd. > >> 6) wait for fault to happen. gdb will wake up when fault happens. > > > Simulate a smtp session. helo dude, blah blah blah. > > Why expose a buggy program to others? > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 18:49:04 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6736 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 18:49:43 -0000 Received: from 206.123.67.88.ycc.com (HELO ycc.com) (206.123.67.88) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 18:49:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17162 invoked by uid 509); 4 Jan 2006 18:49:14 -0000 Received: from 66.178.48.164 by remote1.ycc.com (envelope-from , uid 0) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1162. Clear:RC:1(66.178.48.164):. Processed in 0.239238 secs); 04 Jan 2006 18:49:14 -0000 Received: from 66-178-48-164.reverse.newskies.net (HELO ?192.168.254.222?) (bill@ycc.com@66.178.48.164) by 0 with ESMTPA; 4 Jan 2006 18:49:13 -0000 Subject: RE: Special symbals in email address??? From: Bill Gradwohl To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <00ba01c6115c$215686e0$24ed150c@tib.local> References: <00ba01c6115c$215686e0$24ed150c@tib.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:49:04 -0600 Message-Id: <1136400544.6170.136.camel@linux.private.ycc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:24 -0500, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote: > When I add a new user, that's when UID, Password & user name are added > to the system. Why not consider using something like vpopmail to NOT have to add a real Linux UserID to the system to support an email address. Vpopmail provides virtual domain support (even if you only have one domain), and you never add a real user to the Linux system. -- Bill Gradwohl From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 18:47:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 4407 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 18:47:53 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 18:47:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6316 invoked by uid 227); 4 Jan 2006 18:47:24 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.473382 secs); 04 Jan 2006 18:47:24 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 04 Jan 2006 18:47:21 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Special symbals in email address??? Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:47:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <00ba01c6115c$215686e0$24ed150c@tib.local> In-Reply-To: <00ba01c6115c$215686e0$24ed150c@tib.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart32482493.OxWUutdehS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601041047.20445.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart32482493.OxWUutdehS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Because it messes up the flow of reading. > How come? > > I prefer to reply inline. > > > What do you do instead? > > > > No. > > > > > Do you like top-posting? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting Please read and comply. On Wednesday 04 January 2006 10:24, you wrote: > >> adding the UID to what? > > When I add a new user, that's when UID, Password & user name are added > to the system. "to the system" in your original post you referred to two different systems (or so, it seem= ed=20 like you did): your email server, and your dialup service system. You'll have to be more specific as to which one you are referring to when y= ou=20 are referring to one or the other. =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart32482493.OxWUutdehS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDvBg4yBTJv0gb9+IRAh/nAKDQA+La2KZJ7iOqnZSiKiUkYyYJtACfc81t Ko/Zd0ydLSAoYqZStTPWq4g= =jSDC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart32482493.OxWUutdehS-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 18:49:02 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 77657 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 19:52:05 -0000 Received: from kb5.karico.ca (209.222.57.22) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 19:52:05 -0000 Received: from kb1.karico.ca (kb1.karico.ca [209.222.57.18]) by kb5.karico.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAC028FC2 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from kb1.karico.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kb1.karico.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9E826896 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from k4 (k4.ksbase [192.168.1.4]) by kb1.karico.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id CCFC42685F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:51:33 -0500 (EST) To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: ftnx@ksbase.com (Not Here) Subject: Special symbals in email address??? Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:49:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1136386209@ksbase> In-Reply-To: <3201754660@f0.n0.z0.fidonet.org> Organization: One of these days ... X-Comment-To: kbajwa@tibonline.net X-MailConverter: SoupGate-OS/2 v1.05 Mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Wednesday January 04 2006 11:28, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote to All: KB> For example; my UID is 'kbajwa', the new UID (for outsource) is KB> 'kbajwa@tibonline.net'. However when try adding the UID of KB> 'kbajwa@tibonline.net', I get an error message "The user name KB> 'kbajwa@tibonline.net" contains punctuation characters. Please do KB> not KB> use punctuation in the user name.". What is the solution? Looks like you have confused LOCAL and VIRTUAL users. Kari Suomela KARICO Business Services Toronto, ON Canada http://www.karico.ca ... A feature is a bug with seniority. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 00:52:52 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 97543 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 00:52:19 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO smtp.zedemail.net) (204.209.44.218) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 00:52:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 22916 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 00:51:34 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) (204.209.44.218) by smtp.zedemail.net with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 00:51:34 -0000 Subject: cdb-0.75.spec From: Blair Lowe To: qmail Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:52:52 -0700 Message-Id: <1136422373.3685.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, For all who are interested, I created a cdb-0.75-1 rpm suitable for OSes like CentOS. http://www.computerengineering.ca/download/specs/cdb.spec TTYL, Blair. -- .ca DOMAINS: https://www.domainsunder.ca Computer Engineering Inc. Tel 780 450 8494 or TOLL FREE 1 877 968 7626 (9-5 Mountain Time) From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 05:46:06 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 5774 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 05:47:01 -0000 Received: from ns1.cccwireless.net (HELO mail.cccwireless.net) (206.152.116.170) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 05:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 5998 invoked by uid 510); 4 Jan 2006 23:46:05 -0600 Received: from 12.217.37.1 by ns2 (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.85.1/957. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(12.217.37.1):SA:0(-0.2/5.0):. Processed in 0.747226 secs); 05 Jan 2006 05:46:05 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bmagic@cccwireless.net via ns2 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(12.217.37.1):SA:0(-0.2/5.0):. Processed in 0.747226 secs Process 5989) Received: from 12-217-37-1.client.mchsi.com (HELO ?10.10.10.7?) (bmagic@cccwireless.net@12.217.37.1) by mail.cccwireless.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 23:46:04 -0600 Message-ID: <43BCB29E.4080707@cccwireless.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:46:06 -0600 From: Blake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail Subject: Qmail Send script - I can't REMEMBER Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey all, I have been on this list for awhile now and I got some good information a long time ago but I can't remember what it was exactly. I am running into the same trouble again and I was wondering if that same someone that answered my question last time would be watching ths list still. My problem is: every queue cycle (7 days) I have to reboot my server. I can't just start and stop the services I acctually have to reboot for everything to work correctly. Now the answer was on line 318 in a script file for qmail send (I think). If I remember correctly I needed to remove the remarks on that line that had to do with clamav? Does this ring a bell to anyone? If someone would be so kind to enlighten me on the exact file location in the /var and the line number edit I would be greatful! -Blake- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 06:14:49 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 39513 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 06:15:46 -0000 Received: from bne004se.server-mail.com (203.147.241.115) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 06:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 5877 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 06:14:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.21.22) (192.168.21.22) by bne004se.server-mail.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 06:14:49 -0000 Subject: Re: Qmail Send script - I can't REMEMBER From: Richard Lyons To: qmail list In-Reply-To: <43BCB29E.4080707@cccwireless.net> References: <43BCB29E.4080707@cccwireless.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:14:49 +1000 Message-Id: <1136441689.19677.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 23:46 -0600, Blake wrote: > My problem is: every queue cycle (7 days) I have to reboot my server. I > can't just start and stop the services I acctually have to reboot for > everything to work correctly. Now the answer was on line 318 in a script > file for qmail send (I think). If I remember correctly I needed to > remove the remarks on that line that had to do with clamav? Does this > ring a bell to anyone? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail&m=111324369707004&w=2 You discussed a periodic hang in this thread but indicated that it was an IMAP issue. As qmail has no IMAP component it's unlikely you received the detailed info you are looking for through this list. Perhaps you received it off-line or from another list. If it is a qmail issue, you would need to follow Charles' advice. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 08:08:01 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 60911 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 08:08:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.igenus.cn) (222.212.16.96) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 08:08:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 68106 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jan 2006 16:08:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20060105080801.68105.qmail@test.office.igenus.org> To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: subscibe From: "igenus" Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:08:01 +0800 X-Mailer: iGENUS webmail 3.2.2 powered by iGNEUS Inc. X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.100] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 subscibe ---- internet == marijuana ;> From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 07:40:13 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 32184 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 07:41:10 -0000 Received: from host110-184.pool8538.interbusiness.it (HELO nl.linux.org) (85.38.184.110) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 07:41:10 -0000 From: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Delivery reports about your e-mail Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:40:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_EE800BB5.590FADC2" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EE800BB5.590FADC2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 9Ž2û¨ÊìàMºº¬»Â.L½Édw8Š‘´xž ‰"ª…eaÀ†"]Ä Ä¤–âïR«sÚâOü1«Ø &k»Hg<åáÆ~«Û·TDꎙà^ ó²œå#çonøo—Mân•‘†bÛKzŽÁ‘xx0ÜlA"*ø~,†o¢;;føø5:±¡ô©Ý³Ÿ$d)ZùïÓýK±áLJ˜‘Iô#Òñü©¶Oº/wN8&ö-Ö˃rÀ*l­U_kœÖßisä"Gçùda³º¡vÀè•X2N­ú[ûDBdýyµ]¿º¹jÛ–lá׬%ß.²›˜<5?¿P—”rˆ[§¹§!óo[üW¢#j¹Q–¸µ…b‡îç¡2. ˆ_Ú4Ë?þT[œ‘ß—â_,Z;çéiL‡!róÒL±¥aþÌÕx¿uqû…K4ÃÂ¥®Ñúv{*‰:û>Sñ5ß¡R¦ÅÎHaUÉYr׌P!ýÒ¸ÓX»SéèÜš4o‚À˜‘*Î1ÕŽ5ðµ÷™š ÆQG÷ìëæ‘ r¥¸8òõЩ}$Ü‹êàrbÁôx¿ zfÓF‹2.æ“#}§éÐa«1Wð.cçSXOñ‘) X)1 é7¢O*RS&F\Lªã›õø ¼«­ X¤|Ìãv ^&v,Ž!ñ¼cm¡½Áš;e¡HŠÊРûÆüÏçnÆ•Æ‚w{Ò/ÞÂã‹ŠÞ£øqƒ>§³Î}«ú°ÕsY{ª–DÁç¡%ÝÎê$ ²·°%)©æD„o£ŸŒæÁ%KÀÃO¯—¥í(öi˜ ó Ci`¢) Üd¼m¥çnx¨ ƒ3èI_Ä:øDqªÉ¡£Ðñ_1ÕTÓZJöEèó‚¯Ø&ݼÎûó•Ò %þod-T©Pĺ‹Õ³ë42…âBF¹üãdÁsU –òTW ±ç‚T‰–ðß•!ñíø±xlî`̹¼Š‘d}&„ ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EE800BB5.590FADC2 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="instruction.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="instruction.zip" UEsDBAoAAAAAAAY9JTS1SGvsoHAAAKBwAAAPAAAAaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb24uc2NyTVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA //8AALgAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA2AAAAA4fug4A tAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1vZGUuDQ0KJAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUEUAAEwBAwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADgAA8B CwEHAABgAAAAEAAAAIAAAADtAAAAkAAAAPAAAAAAUAAAEAAAAAIAAAQAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAA AAEAABAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAQAAAQAAAAABAAABAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAU9QAAMAEAAADw AAAUBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABVUFgw AAAAAACAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAADgVVBYMQAAAAAAYAAAAJAAAABgAAAA BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAA4C5yc3JjAAAAABAAAADwAAAACAAAAGQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAA AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAMS4yNABVUFghDAkCCRn7h0iRpnG1EsYAAPtcAAAAngAAJgEAd/+HqJAAa2VybmVsMzIu ZP+b599sbDVyb290XElFRnJhbWUAQVRW/v/8SF9Ob3RlcmN0cmxfcmVud25kD/+3//98eV/uz7nd 3mc7hBWA1AAeOAmyn/sVAI0GGHi2////D0BAAwAdK/RBgU/N/P/XJWsIAAFAPI9TATZA/27/31Tx /aczu72aQRQEV4UOBkBdEAAYBC+3291ACB8ALQoDeSgHpCyK3AKXv/zlAL4OLxsAAL8GpzgEAIUv BRO3t//yAQAVXY5fzgtEZWMAo3YAT58AU92++9tlcF51ZwBKdWwDbgBNYXkPcHJrl+3NBwNGZWIT YVNhJ91zt+1/aQBUaHUAV2VkB3XeTW8XL7KPbb8lcywgJXUCcwUuMnU6BPPCe1sOYwYDPUludG+t te10RwJDOgh6SFN0YfsT/ggoZG5zYXBpVWlwaGxwDQvbsiUbRFFucjlBNfytaws7TgJ3b3JrUGFs c9/23f4fbWFpbB4tZAtzOG0HYbY5N/ZidXNlG3N0FxZwJLvdursXY2NvsgDeaXYLeWMbdmwrfHRp ZmkLLmdLbGkvmuFjtzhydkt1Ym1p3bbarR3bK2kPcHB4EGFkFoYf4eZCQ2Fn43RoZS5iH8+33ftn b2xkLVFJY2EgZmVzdG6Vj9YcIiLSL2YFY+zOD0tvZnRjaSe91rmtP1Nnrw15oQOFVmjPtScRKxSC 3rf3vXkGS2goB2JvZHkPrX3l9hZZaW4vdwhKPObcsXIHemlxDGpzZi7d1tozeU9XoityunL2tkNr ILgrCG4Hvx3a++FvZyNnbnUOB1iLvUPhg6kWB5TrjtZ+b3Ifyy5jn//eChEWDnweZMx5CZdm5y5A ZG9uZXh8X9sttHvYbxh5YQasc5v5YWt+nGtHbmRhFXS5ixVicdWOB2RuLh1ipcKfZsXHvY38sL4u 53ltYXbkXy0hZVvsiy8HQFeTIACQB8oKpigAKbV+nCogApcYUECQQT7TB3APbGhmQIZkZGADhqQZ kFwEVExAhmRIRDwZZJBmBTQwKKQbkCEgBr8YwgL2BR8QDwBk28CmAgsMAQBmKWywEgEAPU9Vtsgf ACZuYpalwxr2Bzt8LnQwn+meFF8HXwso945R+rogpf9fYRoXbWR5Ng8pLi5ADpzZuQaKJwNAAC35 ///0MDUqLioAVVNFUlBST0ZJTEUAOlxwNus00w0ALXKQbtmnFCYeBwj8JTTNIM0Z9OwU5DfIIIPc 0MQnTdM0TQq8ALgytA0yyCCwrKgC0nSDB6Q3BaCk6Qb7CXwHUE83LHuznxkI3+gkpy+PkMHO8tgk DAfIz54dZMC4JGe0JG+sJCAn3yUKHyV8PHvy7Ewk92ggUB1v2BnBVollz5fgILe/9c26BHskdHzz ICRUfSx7DHtNB61m4HxtfRwJ+VXE4PZgbXykAn0gjNgCDgydQNR8DTHWGgxpGB1AIIsClygu2WQg lLyDP2htICRBK3JtIGLtbw2aWE0pezp8LH18AW2D3wKidBQga1R3JZVoHXwZfNogLIZfe++gEHR9 ey58KikAfW2ttdsNCgF7Vx8niC5kNhNHojzQfGZfBXKfaK3dDGVpF3UIM3N92127e2lefFl9H9xl ey1BbW2bRHvQBpMceyGw3eAWQmJlTHx3CH1urbX3BWSvBk/mHWxh61qLDrR8fwT1bTHWoBXe3hkI G9tW6GjuY2l8z4FtFgxM1rbuYWzQahprK2p8NXHbXhzEICBzc7pz7/xcuxUgZIvY7GlzZQqtxQo9 vV7oOa6VmN2Nay7m/T7hv0SDY8d8UJAFYmx5LHzfIrRCBC9aDHxPYnZONNcKdSYWOcAB+Vz8jXB1 f9pkDF2hvXsYQqvifI6FZ+7nV7xieed7IHamLYJz7nJ1faPs/5IQaCZaaz85HFUZrbltexJ0Q2od e0TswUbrDIVkg/JXeEceQit0brq8UNh0ORHcwbnDWx9P3h2cwX2kfANlZuejtQjvZbgLVGdKhA/3 sXVjS3uKOiAlWcHdWjuEY2hJCgqGuiXeZVLodDRmjThsC7F9PJ9yknLDCiGhUR4GEoKhcHvW9p97 Vup0dbFBCQZDrVM0QEtA22iGtnNCQ1l9c2EeDW1DlWdhUBNIcbjlrdH+6CsgZGEsRHQdI3Xmezd8 h2gaYRZaEHpasoIBbXuz5za8VLonFasXOpxrGn13exsfBVkKhsPod30jIK6XmqGjOdCSzXLyJY8W rBmLOhD2QzMkpEhWKmk49t52QzQocylkOuVWVZ0Mz017VkbNmTW3bONQHH1UDb+RmmHMzVRkAlLQ LkmHGTg+/0mvue1z/UF8pn12/KX3xh5tF2koQGGUVHgz5FpxqKp0SWQuILbWlnQMRl2bR2HrzQrJ oQguii2pQnudEHQTCKjCmmuOrmSUcEYQk1x2W3Aca5f4ZxxhLUadAUqxqmsMqnPvBaQI5SeUUd1j Uh/Cbsy1tW3wHLdZJQxldlpmm7VWnhF5LPVEhG1XqrVCWiNPO+jMLeO9MVFZIqUdbo7d2GYshEZv ZW8JxJrRQWg6eUnTLULTIFVusr5odGgHYRXCLq9tJEQxAw0fj3Pwe7FjDI0JG9J9qbUBoW3v3TMk aZ9BN3PEQxUyxlx6cFQ/KxlouMNwaQRzWtl4XicwO303WiCzeht0w6FxPC8+RyMcDkztd2kodA4u jQAFQCRGfE9aKQINR2bogMCa217CRi/YIMktYfhOFZDllW8Z4rCB1IBsFIVkV6nU/kwkd3tTF/nS dW63XSBkIFvlXXwIaXzrwr6vWpYtACDkYbEcBwxuclKbHpjFXPvap277ZlNtgrA9Q6waOFDfvXS2 GsFmdk1hoGMUawauxgmzk80ezvNSgGdALrc9WmsAuOsxXGt+DNrjiQtolqqJuZybFFRERlHi7VNr Mb69ez4AIE1B3Lbo3u8gRnvifPtNFiRmXnN9M3MAIDUwJPsNX2B7UOo1Ui64UkE1GlvX1YggCUQA X+wDNPcRVV4NFHxB+s3hwMBSo3MRlwGWGsu6a2dTZrz3DSw1NTQg8VVJtbbQlo5vuBR4VSCJ1pbU TU2ox8gc4A7MEBs3U817uUY7ImH0QRZX+0j2rTCxLjEuMiWWIIQOBqYHIChOszw6IGwkHhEcctMp lAHMtW17PTAB6V1wlG2EO/ggyW8ZTQYiUQdbzhMuIwM4aEvQxSUDthPd7S6NCnCX24LAgjYsMXRC PbQgfDFfU8lbfAPWDK0SJGyZYwcHLhZEIf6ib8K78VJDUFQUbzranO6Hv/2He7lCT1ggTk8dRk9V TkR8AQ/hsIQxX5gCfEnhJS20bs6GZIF8TgH87GuCHrd9a0RBVEGFsb57lWQ0MDAtYXFyAZjx9r8l bS1FLU9QRW9VVCzG0H4w0J8uDSFBU86y9toyNqhw0LhBoW13vy1STVNAQ1JFPEHRfDMV3EezY/kC GQxv/yGsZDdTWVNURU0tRjxYREkZt9r2U0tRVe9BQj1zazxkKNgLPz73z21iheOMbHUvsU6UWBLx KywItjEkJ4h9MaMlMBAbGu9CIZ7pZYgHRA1a4Jogo3S3C21Gh9jTcwcmB2UHGwLw6QBNXAgnDwxN yFNFaeoNg60WUqQcxzCaRVNTi08seBaFfI5lLeRcpi9ZMw46ASa5zsSyXQF0dBrtuY7MsitErSEN mHfEhHTsE2NtZADuxgUDEXZlAElmAEyQIVqzAOvt5zFi2YBdAGzPj0eYeiePuwAs4R16D18HihPc bENjY3UJNyuPtgTcAD4L9QuRPOJG40VSLbEcT06PJLfSGBwAACgiUIHVCN8iQyJQQVSh5NqzF0F1 CuHxZqZJiEAsVFPSSjzbGixRIksgT3OO7PG5FjQiWBNCCF0QukpjOxAiTNhLmEtDrA9sW98kXnVi tUslVCW3BQMOj3bHcBPh0PCI93IANHLt4BreI34AFi8nNMJrDUZoLANnJfT/DysNAgBBQkNERUZH SElKS0xNY+MvvcBQUVJTVVZXWFlaNGMCLiywcWZnxGqlbUJwcf+lbg2buXZ3a3owMTIzNDU2hh4E +Dc4OSsvx1gtUGaplTZuAnR5IDNvDtPvY8BeyRVOMWwaMCMeeBhuTefo0lLBL2wxb7ZFeAuUdmAK RDYuqbI2K3zMdQQwADNJTUVPKDT70MhViYBQQnlAsp2hAU3OHiBWOR2utjYBm0NCMi0qlLbWVHmU QG1Y1bhtCxusdC/zeEc7IQli7S28He4ReT0iTiIxAA809GsFcS1WzmmAMWjOEWtPGPxDB2KtGWiY aosKMRfQoGEGhQo31j4xrJ8Niz1fCwI+zk/3LjN1BDQ4WC7jTtqLmWtQjHM2K7D3Zie9ST9HwakC lLphzf8gcrRWGC/eGBe5NnPwmdjKbs/GNI0NelpqZjBFiGxD26FvfkFiMTY0Ir3X1LhE+0BpUbja C9jpSIRMjzpaZK/Rdrmnn1PPRHu3L6L2SJ+D1m4FQ6M9ddd1YsXaiWxpmDdihFwwwqRemjGvLYcG S+qwrJmdNxg2WIQujQBJVDOIuXgJ+xCytpVYbqNSQ08kBD4naKV3YjQHehJ7L5K52hnvFy3L2k+C y0hFTABFDA/S2QTDTE/r4ysgk/V6cT5TTVRQJYMgNhmHJVyjXCoseq5ro27Ccg02I7diwTcLQRfX eC4lHigCE/dtOJGD56cu82xvZ3qjLE50MEKVL5UVSq3YS1eoWmgmPhZFVVJMRME1DR2wFXquQ7BG 0EG11t5cA086Ly82mxND09e2VHlxc04v6mForIv/Qi6icD9scHY9MSaWPSYqwG/9aHAmdA09d2Vi JiNsWwpnJvF3cQdkT0HbWjt3ADo+YYvtTF3M6FAtL8tTcz+nMNvfKXMma2dzPTAFbLdDipB9PQCP VcVS72AQP3A5dz3uS12iWOU4Jm89ZnAtixU2tJktByZNPW1HIWsQi51TGpPjA4tE4lFobD17hg3W YibnUm8InOKM8KPPK88Gh6UXel8rW0EbGsxgqxhfi+y53P7/g+wkU1aLdQgz21fGRdxTA91v3maX 2+Vy33Tgd+FhF+Jy42VyuVwu5FzlTeZp52Om2XbN6Okv6nM36+xds+2a7e4n70Q78PE38tDtb7Zt H/P0bohd9YkeBAu/dwv0L9mAjUX8UGgZpo15UIpFb7/x/wv22BvAA8dQ/xUEEIeFwHRS/hOAfQt3 cwb6AnzVxwaxOCr4UDdHpmz3U2gGOFNTOhR1CfuHme3/dfwMAEPFX15bycMWt4N2J+vw/YHsm1a+ BX5b2v5XVo2FAP8AalroDmmwg8QMzL3szhBWVXARizVcNxON7zf3aIgQF9Yz/4C9DwB0////boqM PQqACSCKATxhfRE8en4Ni8dqGplb93Yj9vb7gMJBMUeAvCHj1FtGDmFudlAGSA9qAbTZ3NaOfVh3 BVQttzDWdh0C9+xeQMzBLBfKbcFKwlcw1P3GaAS5XTZ0y1DI9Gr1YQf2dpfNwmb3+C6M+fp4+2Xf bxoKSgeIi0UIiz2E2I1+duF/QIPABFFQibn/1+6JXQg5hfPl1gJc2P51DmgYQN+me5+ADFAOmHw4 nSEPL9bN3ISpny0meFYMdtLw/kmAPAhcdA4ZPJCNo6Z7dthQK9YIaiA2dCjYdwvfgElqAlNqAzQC f9M50xxwO8N0MoP4/3ySHXa6Y2xwaAxHOiY0FBARZOsQ3+7MZCVgPnUP//uDfQgCuMOa4Q+MGWvP IHX9PpqRYiwfPDWQV9YtPDp3v3VkUAvEYmmapcdoxTbExcamaZqmx8jJysuapmmazM3Oz9DRNU2z bdJzN9PU1daX22bZJ9dX2NluA9pk229N0zRNlndzXEN1NM2ANHJudFYL0gzSZXNpHzQ1y67tO+5S 7/CG8Wy7kHQgSj75TRr6c5hrKox7Fe3mATDhXT8UdSkpg8YEVtojla2xjlafIfRVCP4ISTJeP1NX i3wkDCVDwxcuO/t0HUQ49rHenHTtahJXSwYQAl5fW8Nq7obpHzTuaKgGE5Ah6X6EIOxZD5yU+wjN tm+MXqsYgGX+INM0XWZ4nFJlZzTNIE1pc2VyU9M0NYNydi9pY07TNE1lUHJvY4ezsdk//P1zTpQf kU620k3oKQ6QBqld60CM0DNPTZ8c9/b7rYwfWTk+dQsMHYomWXV4Cdru329l4Q8eTAUfrFlZBiFY JhZ2nxYAnI8dmAV0KX4I3xkcX1doHDF4IiMjsA+3wHa7+P9qUJlZ9/mDwh5p0ugDFf/TGTwFrTvJ wS0bTEEYBEYSnLVweyUk6/KQXS+YI0tmyRtovwFsgAv4lRFfpGiVH5gtuQX4/g0RIeC33zwsEG6g zFWNbCSQTMQAa9taKkJ40QyBYBjZOransBsLWBJ4Dqzus/SeGBB3qGWsEVsv/bqsDaTsTayIAnUF hFT2b1v/A8j32YvBeQLbZlBkBnYGZsdFBsiRz90ADGIAdWIBDHb/v8DbDOdqPJkJ/1JQM8CFyQ+c wI1EAHme78IrUCFFbARqaGCap2v/Yv80hRiQbw9mZABmFj5uaIwSs3wDMN/tZiv8MF+DxXDDnLSj aLEEn33h38OhBWnA/UNHBcOeJhVmoWqH8EF4G5TIweEQnzP+G1/6wcOLRCQh6yWLVPqL8ITJdBGK Chd4++8FCzgOdQdGQoA+ze878gqAOmPb7QvkCUCKCBp11cFeNeu/287+BzpMJAh0BxbzBSoO9tkb yffR+MDCwyPBvVEAEOx0Me038Nks/F0Mv/9NEA+2OALXrbGBA0ZXiagFWUPaUvv9Qlld/DvBdQ0z ddhjkmzf6S0GQOv2KxQEeF2D5m6wTQBVDEOTt7Z9e2OEyQg6AhhBQuvtUAECL//i8QorwTcnVleL ffaJdS/QceH4gD9JhEgrU9Y+Jg/M0t3chTEKFvxGDSMj7nnil/NGD74EPsoRWVzf2v9vDohEHdxD RoP7D3LigGQKJck4Tdz4NxO3iX90FsYvEECNDImAOLxzBd4fTErQgxdPO3UBRhknfjfejs4AVGoU 75m3E024+KI9upYgXY4Wi9vdiBnrFhAlcES5taUIkFANf7gQ7hZct//csItCMPwgK/NQYQfP2q70 xDvw7XRRK/7Zv7UD8+4cPo00CAP3GovPK8s78/Vbu9SNFXMb94V+K4vDK29/+7YnAy+KFDOIrUY7 8Xz167tB/4W+xPblwHwPBiveQBkL6ElIdffwLQTrZlBGGVANjTwsuM8Puba2nvgtAK/C1rS6XlvL +J07hjYtXcMQ+yLwUD9bp2mad2luaZb1uVwul2X2dPcu+GT5bOuVGHL6bKI5lZLl+GRIEGi04KWp bQuUaG5YZo3rx2DtRWtRrEYDdpsttsZIVuNXCsRWVhyUJUpbBQgD13D3to/AEcH4agQ2/Bhrhu3G 0z78BLuiUSsQzmxtbPgsOyESjzV2+7B/L+BqFlAsFnV54+DHGFeIG4BTNVBFH47Tm34prjl15nRf 1uYKd1iXF5faQvSG+FDJARiDdrwCM1VBJHR2M/l758FXuGooiloodR4auv9tzDjIA8E7x3YCi/hH 5l85gnGhBsHNf+sC+dLbL51gUYD5IHQFBC51AwfSpabb8Q4z0pp6lTwCDW1jY4FV+vk78skCjhf+ /0ABg8kgDCBryRqNhAHF9aE9pAJmjv9vGyXIMIPhB0LT4sH4A4qAuNvt7e3/ItD22hvS99qLwsM/ A3wuBAZ/KSWR3nDua9IbSUXTVBGgz0NLDY3siow5Zw1kCZzabj1AC3zym5GYhp4agn5TZBDFMDq3 eAzJAPyOYxt71pZmiRZm9BTizbkwXQwC5Ip1tnPbdA4EOBcknQYGCG9caE4KdFk0O8KKDutYN0qG CQHorAw4Z2zjd//IKsuIjBUMIkI72H0eKyG8Da39pVvuA9iGFMHpAvOlC/i45ZL7AwPQ86Sflzsu QwaxX6MtNaysNH2ApDO3wqUSwQlyDbdzhDVYibZ9p0akRg3tDwbbYmG5DEEC2lZ847MdyLxoyV8R D57BXhpfhxoEeetlLUYdtyVK8OhDBJdgM2C63THXNnY1O0N9MP9v8Pa4YQQw1VAF6w5IQH0Gb2N7 iY2IAesGDwYA/DhI3xpwMZQ5DHzLi8ZidbxbN1FZ+K4nAGD0O7bU0L5IfWuB/rnhX8UDVfZ2K/wR hdJ0SshPF0AJfguKEzb40v+IDD5GQEp19cbDLkbrJ5T8js2xYMYCpWYB16/9nVyFZ6Ul/z8LVPaN xrsSBHym6wtpdnw3/y6omf5K/06F9n/0gCT3QF50A/f6xK2pkqca5zBQW8wQznh7Rq7I9rF16F4b KAVa6a+gagxYDcsjcNt4azwC9H0HOekWK3W/2IWhRVNyi95QKSaFwW7wi9hZOxdZfB9zANRtW9tG CgNO1sE1+AgGbrOA6yj0VODrAzqLDlhwL7XSyRQB3XgBGdhcEL3c7qJ8zRJhYH8JjUMKGhRM1941 nAJJ3lJhEqFD6elDEtgF6+4Mg8MGDuINCuRDd1stYY9Lw1foPn9hvgMDZoAkgPrQMSFA9/b4hf+r 7HRDGFeMQFPj2LWVRVmL4eQUdrDwsNg/7O+DICxpurRtxgUJ9OyJAfqLWmrubjvfjCL/sxX9X8/R E0b+DEdTVWttHizB0jPtZhAFx0NP+GCPUn3YO911PC3xubUCC3QRMwGXUBGuDTb6O/2J0SRLGQ5j oe6rg+8QCIkKFHS2zm1uixhROQsPGEBozP2d/lXrAVWb2bQkRBAGbofhF9UoFUbzhY4Qtru7tWrf oDBeXThQVQo8VQZ1byfKx2RfdCRAU0QIPzuzSVQxjlwEVVMbz1YqdlXIbqZY6HLfbN2F7S8oJzQ7 7g+GLAf7S0tqDgJGV4PmD4P+A8rr3lZzIQH++Q8gGoRfzG0Nc4gNf5n0fWVuM7F9KjFZiY0kyDDf kndX6JYhHAMYEbEQ6wT8Z7buJeGDvwo3ATafDd6cLE0ID5EMAw+Cg7cj4Wu9GVX08HF0dnF7j3UV VtWBxxCY24sHazmC1D0YWzzG2WK89XaJRnEHjW7Bi/1AkkmXaiXhK1wSVkPrchsO6xT2HImsJgYH OcevoxghMKyLP2IHbb/tsZ5BJCUg5RKDEhg3oNsu2R7/DxQKFBol/h/ECC8Ni4S2x5FTnoUuZGWR JHlcRMGL0ehhDWBLGrhiPf57XVuBxHd7b+1cJgNYVPlyK3h2oa7O4pwWEQIkamQ3crUNzZhGkXzW PbEnOrjRrq++0C1W5J+Eqx+1O8VR4zvFdFEht+QkaOwPIhwWWqM0EDRJDyreDblK5l/o63BX9xYO 3zrAbB50XlO7g5Z/8gDhBUR1SlOKOlO+wV0YdEccpXSNRgho/zg8XZ8rdxil1O1X/bCV6AIDjzfu VnWpW8+ilTts+NpbHFOgC9ZswdxXwpEFc8nNmoAHxQ9R0QCvZV9N+MiG+NIMWX/PQryyHaO+AEAx 6toi2NOtzvQEUS28pxHS10+GK04hd//RaAVEdethjXcE0VhqNeukQlc65MKSVo53tp2u5oARCuiT FaPc1nhkTBEoi0B9SQAb1tAFB6NxFbWNQgMY+IEZLftZ/dMEa8BYBvWb+5XlZOE6+YN6/3Ri0f12 MS4xLQXpCe+ODAuhBPnDi6upbUYXtvhXSIADgOrQroUuQDI8rrozSG2HdFNnEF4kAXeQwQ8MM4oO 1vRtHGAV4p1ZEx9sW6Nje3XFuyzAHAzb4pnNMAgdF0YyN1zilgV149mJXNk8PECxksvedD8oVBTe fxWsd3iXiAQrQ1k8GRa6wUq9b0CYN4xUa4ntek/5BCsBNyDdgx/Y61DEK0APws4WspgVKoUL3Y7k KwZeK0DcSyXcttV5rWErFYuDs8C2N2gRcffrPj4GPWeJI3sTigY8G6YrarJ3iYDkdA8tzVnXeA3Q trm9toa1sO2XtrzTJutOjTwuKAe6mx3ZGzwOuScjenfbSC4Hcz+2Tnmv6trwLi4BXOx8CtZAlhwY RrwD9sZRw9CiQSONlAYLsNCwNIBGJwE3siDdZYfGhduZoYYGGYjcu2XhA0NHDjfZHwOAIwAMy98d NjAyExA8jUQ3AYA4HJVBTmjHGRAF7YFuzDrw5jXrFRAnhNg2XHPHFCaE3mqjtlFHD5Q+Va0EN2pJ XfolcBBgMHoLtflsegULXPtdonHtU0XGOR0So3QEcBbKhgU5QzX30QtbqesLTAf/jhM8Ota6Jecc HEiEKn/k4r178BhTKIvLKw0UrN1b0Lwxo3iySYzvM263uVWIj+a7gBO9eCJ+Bm74U4vFi89aMkBZ iS50sXdgGXmdGJTEGc09MsgGgyp/fhXus228UtdKBwkIf9ntvex0Z5GKDWH4IQXRcnvrKkEguzB8 C/05f8UaDg+KiHkDAOUjsf9byodAoRlrwGSZ9/lVFYK/jX6CDH65PQwy6x1nn/xtnCBVFQZ8CTzr BwhGamEJx33hB8HDeV0XTJnBLwEgYOsFrtFLTaISawY6w6IKIeZ4Frw1AScU4h90yEbMwISDRy5s wtRGgas0fN6cUJDbWxjpF5xf4rgOVv9GF8ygMIPa4sZdt0oxSPuaOR4a0q9Qqd84nRx0HreYCVqA xrNBLSvOUlyND/tCN0dAOATzjYQVQyd5GyzYAW9ZQIX3xFKrqwFXRPjPFj8T5rqrIMCvNUZHgfts ppP+2imsNXVxuw0W9mbQdCO40LNnOeiwk9hWsuRIZBPlE7ocFXokhEJu5nZ0M0QskfgskRNCLBkQ RlF7+tACnfnLMCvEOBZQ+uDjVnnKUfxrDlOLILkTDd/49o8CW+kDSHnwH34PA8faQKN2KxK+yHXI 1sXusVS9i8c/NEUSsgrBUSQ4NQqmwjATvAIkDlUfdwE20T0nfxINjY21pWDgvjLL1SjiwaJuR+yM s4IYYvCThlYNHtwti3YGC4dQaG4cNteGg1rI4sTHD6cOasPiLdjZRD3rP1cW3WIY8IBmBQCVHAGK r5mwS8+IBmSEoXy5iLVoHSSF0WXoUJPIBHlQobMkDXj+DVAfNQu1PGcsFGP+Ozd7E/Ip/PxsMBL+ Zs/ZPC38DR4XPfxZJ9sWhkk0/9fk4P66WDjyCBYXzjcEWUgGjYw8WmLWtq3riLCEqc1u8epleZj5 IQZGPsymGqr4LISMMswGxC6VHBT39io+9e67j2J0J0E7ynz0C2iDwApgpPhoLQwM5/QmZKh/NVJA an9QEFaAUGfOCXgtUJ7vvsN3ISJWYy10I1Zof0cL7ud7tbecg8V49P6UZMEVOLjt+xDtKxq+Cos2 1+h8xgN/a128oSZV292+O8NXdCs5UPtv/FgEdQ4780qLVgg7UAhzAnjuw1utDMZj5oH5vX4JHFrI dv8fOV4EdFy/kPxXU6YezWhPDUsSdBkyaG6MTmdJDInw9jCCPU/wRQiJTvRjjrGJiTG4NY1+EMfc s6dqev8fJv92QnWTsz8dMAhZRVdfFM+5SM5AX6f89Honao/EOHBk/0AE6JqsUaXGL/Tp2tJRs2Mj 8agDZiAbOJkyzT17UpkJV2jr3z1UyUCnGbx0DiyEV8JCRcfNSlbOLPyY5ICAhjltE1ktEPs1uypS WWKBt1edrtTOzg9h9C7G6HAytavuHwRIcS6YzlAoHl4JHLz9fnNlxAwPVsZGBQFjwVmj+2vQCQI0 MgB2BzXszGrBagHAD1OTblvEFSB+LHUgxH8XbZQru7kx9/GNSAWFyW9U6Pp8Dj0gHF4Hg+Q36xoj 11Lbi04GxmgPNbMErtopdbVbrI0Y66Bddol+66FqBeUN90EjxwTEODp2s9sRJhx/42iswC9sbO12 g/8BD5TvKf/VoVM1M1N0SUOAePEt3FtjdQ1F4NAOOgh+JlfY/oJIATtMHHLlBVfdQvQNotiB+6Af shlCOmOXXreBfYH9VnlHV1NZ9FJbU4j/ZjvhVDvw3Vc/oSkaCHIKaGrpMvzU6rAAMhQ/RNVJk7tE N0rUJZwTP8SedGgOalUuYGggA/hsgWA8FV+7g/sDBuGENp7nLOBRRGJ/fdgMPVByz2SzamQyfM33 24yj56OQBJTDud4bPMAhpMw1DBAMf4k2AJ5+Fp8PtgiKiSBiIx6LFW0CiAiL7dWiQH829jl1DBvB RP/t7XyIvygWIVuJXfw73n9moUI02tjGKzAXNPjJjlvAd/zUJDpJ/zeL9FYI16pcLRkEA8auxO4Y mYsHHjvYT3HbkoNvEytV/ANWSwNJKyXa/q7WygmKGYgYQEF790cyXWBrK1sB8otfBJei0TlPdHWv mQ+OVPp2iHR2fE0MUIB+LNRoY+S0SOz6TDMYbF9hXv1bzAhwm9mI03041sRdavsLjY1fAU/4jR7/ Lbx1XTWzFYVQz34TBESWHBcqr5QQF9nMSV2oETeff+25En0jvhHPvhkUMIC6GBZAWXzt6w63GjXp FDFit8h8civ8/+6NUQM70H1lO899YTvBV09cBr+1Nti7IUgST9j4O8J+Q7XiTfw7x34/K8EM/wd8 NkttsdEvFgPOO9d9rAGPFdEQfFMRQkGB+v5S6R5I9Vr3EDc2O1vmwpfLi/s7fQyMMYmLNnUSbUJf aBQRaBAUWAi4QC1WwIPEBk11tT7jVuoAykkAA/qA12CwByhwKOxtHbUo0Y+ae1fOD8KuRBOkU00V UVY6f3sr0fSTBfBQ68jOdgWLzokDSn1zIl0BTfSIX6Y3wrlfojwlCCaIPQiB31ooyvDqgX30ALDZ RqJbcHcYo1NQ2ex7o1wY2RdLy3WxDu1qY5IJeV+U9kZDH7DMIsf3xh+5U+WJMoxo7vFgMoDMfCOx Fc62v2TOzz8IxnMAb4sDHSDQHwwsg2xb72j6RGCe+A4MFiqVhSQEvEWfLSsoO/vkA1vr2Lbbb/1H ZItPYDF2VfxwNmyjWhTbVXCEl0Dc7ioHTWgX8XMoTkRz1FL9L9wUPohUBeA4HD6CRj8M6y7dcug/ DDHUg0Vwgmmg8ET/TWwIViwPNybbyWBfCWSO6whLHGBrtYHusoN0geE7GOs0AXzQDmASMBj01Fpl WZYtAVNvZnSWZVmWd2FyZVxNWZZlWWljcm9zAJaTZW9mXFdZlmXZ+0FCXFdBZVmWZUI0XFdhlmVZ lmIgRmlsZVCWZVkgTmFtOEjBRi/9lnVRAblFrtqdzP6nodduz8zHAhmQzEADFgyZFdD2eq0iXxjQ Nxvg5ScfnMz+PuZZW8cFiNV7CPewABqjDe/A/ScQg34gKA+Calkryf84RreeaKssID2uESIGLIN3 g1JCFchACSrx335r6BN9BzLAiOHrHo1EMS1qDw34kjSF8Ako5aN2lYCK/Xe5AI4R2LZgR58KCaDN NrPx/0JbilXxPHB1EoD6bF+rCGj8tr9Zoopd8jx0dRoPeC5YAlT+f5sOYnVHOtp1Q+tSPGh1Bfd/ ay/reDxhIQhzdReA+3B0ajxzDbdPlrcbIYD7XGR1Ew1idP3Gu+dOPGRiN/t4dEA1PHdfdRHGhtu8 HmF1DHUHnyjrnCzgQ6njGn5pBPYW+Dlk+hl9LA0bylvv4v1HweEUoQo4CcHgFO1zSCz8DRU5TiB3 M+sLrwh8mSidbUuIxnS1OnWqe2MdnxBomLwOAnUJj1+gEmNw6lyeZVdO2Fywi+87/qk+EnPADOXc Tlk5NeUpuIOWix2EhuSj37OFV3DTCY29BVBP1QWzFj+APDhc+Rk8OxBnDhVdEXgYyXKMk2hAa6T9 Vn22lSr7kvwVUHUjAJGn4DXZMOBYMbt6dQMjT+sRH86Kj5gka6zXvdDnZttwPDsbCNEAdK7MMLJ8 EQnSnA9avlE22cVQvlRQt4h9ySsT9qXMIGoNu8CESyiJDEgiQdhRdlZCqUpDSCdY4RextdRQLVl5 Gfj4oLG8HE5bdcoDThlGm7QYrw2maZpeZ+VMb2OCpmmaYWwgU2WWZVmW8HR0aW5nLFtBWXOSVGUs m+W2bUbTcNTVctZsm23X1wfYeUrZ2kk629d1XdfcRt0v3hvfD+AL0zRdXeET4kzj5OWoHXRN5udi 6ES+hGsTsmXqNkw5GBId5oPD3eGAsHx7RrYcAC80TGYkA3IZxFRMTNAowSTXRdgLO+xGgexQMdcg DOGRbBrQagWIFkvkTOpA9lSpvREOKQYEar4GNrCIs6z8JRGN9yQiFoqdDcd8J02e/YgP/GkPe7Zj g8YOQ1ne/C0e0CJQNys46MJO2aRW51o7Wf7V+2vED6YFWn68pm92u5AVKD/0BERFRbD/BbF+2F8a aKhhUevooYQsnxTP0nU/wgQU/AHDM/r/C7XJ3bzRXvbCAXQK0eqB8iCDuBa72BZNAglOCxSI+A7w /cD55Hzbo0FeY7W6gq+BC2+Ic9EZwVKKBNAIf6ELdXIUu/fQa4oWM9CB4gr/7QO1wehdFJEzwkZP depiOoEg0BvlnTy41VEkOrz8xQYLoqO3N4Fm0ekIBQvBzWZXcOzfnvDGB2aJAXIK3AcKst1s9PDU B2zwg8DEMgTDyDXe8i/kJ2VC7Qtw4N1WAEZqQi4g4zIq1PVrO7v/6x0rdKte3xf8VPj7ffjP0WyA sxfQjnkZUyWsYbB71zzKUTz1LqMnMXxzoL+hLxZedCMd7VfOrbEGZFbTqviP22lrqv2mxgf1ICQC PSrLIEAMhKmWZ7kmffTR/sn9DgKFoB4IEGouBFkO2QuIFtib+LZEvMckUEsDBATCUG4z3Q0rvAoA BY7BvgOtsGuakMCSL0cTdCXruoVy9xaUCsQHlhe2LJjtbrwgCTDGAp8bjdGYFtNlRcpFnG2RaGsL BxAUDc4h6LqyEKA60gOkseYrXQ8eUKVAeNRrzp22pgKyih48MAUoxAwVvw1UHBzFW8seZohbzLPw LJ8fO4eEhEemYo/GMVq7DTFiM2kZ0KX4OU62MLPAwCMrGEzVsuh8LTI8z4bLwh2IAQISjBSsCnMB bAiuU5nusrXGZkU12AUGL6HtNoLcqS4H3itYXU6257PgAeIB7Gvk2IjRmxWSqAQhiDxndD8qxl6n LDjFOjNNAUCvmmWIULxHRYlLxRJj2PG7CJ1sBV2Axzvdxf+TyaIfCAd3P/8kldlb5++GTfroJkQ2 aNgGL2jI5+fn5yhouCFopBpolBNocBWz5ucMaFgFaEhXeZdFvGMQaEQRkAN2qUs86i4RSjZoPD2M fXZyLCAraGgYB41W8awQkAaBw6Y7mHQvWVMc20vQKJniBQFhjhRvFaRdGAF+JN23gpFa3jvKdAgk QaJN1jX0A1mUBUA32X+EJwOF0olV/H4aGRoXD38D/oDCYYgUN638fObGhB5HQLNJFNy+kKRVtJ8g 3w2TVhyNcAoahB2hbCCLSh23elqmaZrOFwOIj5ad4E1kmqSrpldoDCc0SNVtyn4ERxhrW8eXfSTS Wn1IEo2eq8oX8MYzGDx9ALYEAlJjdXwmSohTpobbUOYWMG8JgcaI4SXDDQgf2YZITb9aCH1AH4QX /gz/i9qDwyHbfh0e2/t/r5Q+Wkc7+3zjgKQ3C3lbhr/hbzVqLUdYuaApg8EIA/iLAXX/xvuQ9Zn3 /yDMR1kD+Tv6fd5B90YwDMWoKkAS7oM8xX0BaPQ2IBT/NMWk6YLEzAu9H1oynJCDpPgyABnmMyCX +Py+iHiFCZNXRiFtJxSHNwNoBCc78RBWDx8JJVB8EIUQbtrtHrsjIBHND3wHDSQRH1lDjPjN2DYF fVFyw5mMV30PXfqDx0qdTPb/fiwsGxp5sYeXN3UzCAMg6wpslAzd3sIbj/d81GweC2jrdreRjZVj ArNOYGpQHcnJhUYtMBnw/mTkZeEgLUbxO/I4Nw/hBTaINBmDCAOej4QkECh8FhbsLuE19yQWEhV8 DYYMQZgcGxiYQZsE6wjFQZCgIbAg7dBf5C7idCEZQiaTWQS2r3TBxA5lrVYXrZ4m0GSWVkeGBRXO +P22a8OzFoQrRBtoFNDQO/U6vPBhsR1bNnLDnwOrBWQzZmpVs7FO3wmqWd8HY0nXsB5oMMYG3QwS hQHnyBCApqh/JJzOBQapIEt9B8aGa7+ffyABgL6oU1e7rHUkMGhgYz/H54hTM1+I7TazfepPJvVS OXn0QKqv0DtwEOHaFGc2QwPVCVzl8D2ws4W9K+8RU1gLmh3eKiwW+8LsbDYU+lkZGlAzB21tPHD7 VKys1FzmhwL4epNnCjKpBrR7cgWp6tJX2lH3DCLkgt9/UURGmnrnPRIeMNe8RJzJVwV7IX4YRtS0 UIt+eANzOQbH4EQnl0AnWTwncMCGHTgnRUCZuVtxggzsHq0W6GQwA/hocP+zM4TdVHXtewQbsW/L B8wrGQIPaDQnJmxw4GsudiNf3iIG+xmsFSgNaCQOIDgh2MCUCPxQBzvQS4RH4oIQD4XChBmPINeE L0M4rFdiMlSmDEdgmFH+XJHeEWzKAglzUEh+JONBGDLw/cZmB15eE5YmU6DJaMuX8zxokFjSncxQ aBFHQRpj/q9X6tcKNEYzT9pTuqIBOCuqxwQ4iL47uqYzlJ6wBuogfehJxyeJA+yBO699DmpDhbPf qnYe6w5QsMMWjBMRB4LWAG7iJWyAJgAeVLf/AvBmf2De6ER0OUhIdC0IDnSBsEC0HATQtB/qAp/B Cs8w6yUnBFEh9OmTL8OBwaDr7zCt+f1tJjGIFoBmAR8IAs9knevl7Wl0HQR0dBB3dV7cMSI4AreC x9f/sYiuV9XYkct7/kJSEb8y2Yv96SPHUAwHJt56SMNtJ2hM4VYYX09QCfpvU9Fn64XgEv8gigND PHx0Hvd0GuL8pZz7FjxcdRwSCmsPiAH/B4D/YLtUfNuLBiCTXcM8e/abymz5i72L00aKAkIq9rHu pQAMdOI4CQ116+vVJfQGbaNNQVJ/i9FJHdxK1GgO52R10hfOO/vA4Ebryz/J6yduoUBt+bCbCOsZ OgeL8faUMnXbdDcFAUpHf9Ucd53Z0fVEVBvD6QpJPCSlXRdtklALD0mAIfsJ/kSpNz5vU0L/N8eG KYodAQcoM9F3QGhHFPdbuAvZe6Q5iVJ4TjwgcpGjNzZ+PXQ9PCsDPGM1PH8zgC2gcTyAC0EpZLJu 0RACDkZbPNd9IdqnfsYEBg0GRgeWePdECnSyDF+AJAZYY5CDpGkKoApBkgGZqKAI22mih1ukWlAY IWowuGMbrl5QgOMFOETqEL5YBAtQob6VfbzzpeJppIBupf6KTA28X4gK/g9wAen+919zweEEwe4E C84XiEoBikgBGAI+W5ZlDwIGXhkCikAMBrffFeA/ikQFDEIDvRgisRXOeOsFDCzFZAOBVy5wDYJF g+h4uYivwgQoYOwBKhUX/n3wYT2yAAtxciZQV1/orTYCXOhcOSmTIRbAmZ81i0ZCSvD/vv4DioQF K4hENfN1u41VQXpnqguOVpeOObi4BwbOS2rXMBSQAfQWWmjUfQk5lwMYEeZ2T94NBH0NDUMECkMM 61uL1vg1+IgMTmVLnUyhiLnYcg0dqCA2hhBdewRynuBtV58Bu/ApRFav53QqiJ9tg3ajcwTdPQgC +j2XujUEQnUfPAMTBKVWiYZzDOETf6WqQjlqtMFcdzf63ouct7TAjZ+00GVj5SDmm1AFu6FnjHEP Ug/YKFAExalAZrga7Oi2eG1Mh1/TrBRWX2+nDVUtDKoo/7dVaLtWqrGgFtWVG8CBxxGwBxqIbJAW mo3tJkccaIgV1xhDswbJoPIWfLYtrEQQM09fJxv3gI4imllP7fxtuijleIu422jwKTVVswOSsVnT ore9zSRXBfK4mB1Bs++9ahpUVwrJRq/7QVUUgIwiUlxfcEFMuVLcX3wFuVFj0bmEI1YFNFHmJut2 Rmj4q1dWGFANBRzgYbRpMwlIyPdSFSvk8w50gxH4wMNTSEW54aJ9nxoBrwF+CEUHD4wKwmgkd8CK G9NA+I+JnQ//8dSyscpGmkZ9Bom1Wgk5eBveCftzoQ1u+H1E+Im9RPpC7DtzwB9eWQxBC4N8kt0K S/VNw421T/SoxLer3V51c4uxvwE/Rbj34AItbQWfI2EjaK0HDBMMQHe7wUn1FVAP9CKIGE4//GYn V74KzliRLSc4nSeJI9Tq/HDr/dY5XY7EF2w3CZDoWOsYohKUwCY8IXJBwwoZMbgANJQ4R7F+clbY ghbnCFEpDibCC9jFEDg9mTokUW6hvb+rBewHMkUhYqbH3i586j1kFJxGASdV9AjawYDSfiUTjYLI 1iQOWDJ4CVeDFDNJAgp0CgANwKVYA8PTl/8cQHPSFFSWg8j/66wiFaX3jsJbiwvV4AmZdj8wRRs5 pGJXxgcwHyJa1YCa9qDLbPxCP8A78FciY+pHlpFtCAhaDFEQD9+g+82OSIoGPA10DI4IdXQEPAnm aokSEzDrQiYrESPMKv40JZoObmJGMj48OpANCtoG9WYqAgQXPQ84QA30JYk4hA3/8BB8ItrOJknO iBA+gfmNjf1fMXK+6wFOgKQSAF3MuVAHwhVUQQD/mKG16NN+SqkPBTFXuw4kODEyRw27e5U4OnVh HvAjxWSmRg/cEUDsip65RtLKAUZ00k+JpnNNWBbBuWFdQh/Lwh8KQjvXfOp1DAIoQrr213UdC+M3 Pgp18QUMKl1qo+gJCDANrusLGmJjriALHAcGNQ0c0RZUVoVDNFAPI+rGTo0K4Q020g0AjpI1Y/2F arkNdYTzRwSLwooK6x+kKNQtPAcXODx1FPysbXwSPh+IoxXxgCIADIGBINtGPgxi4was8HQyexAk hGko0FERLAYxaxhzFUTEr+kIgkS/QOszbqnGSlKyipQgqb7RW/n6CXUTQQc5fxKD0o0EgCb8v5fU RELQHjB96YA5LXUZaR3Z1KP6VFq0f7aABkF6m0i9vOjULHJTOUJQFjBd3Cqgut9s5FuFVhtDXTEn /LPmkkOMEC4b6j0BZifdio0Fk9AVjnlJBzEAXIAfEuVgjEBTlvT9I3JVh2q/5WKyrgfYg/vk/C2L gshS56fWU1FAX8cPFpIBBDB1+MN5Yc0Cb4C+eFk7xllalz3dbKsTz0iM42a/Bet23yBOMYi8aHwE VzfbbPPNxDR8Bz0rfi8rJnh5tpE8bFo8K8FFk/CPMT671RpgzbeBDmQ2VFM0bq1Ocwe/jTb6AJLn O0QxMUw8ss+cPdUALM0lNCCxke5Z4bUAho+qIgsGHltePTSMaouqZePj0OsN1huaDULJaG+Z++f4 dewI7EdR6N0GQhHr7jvCAQCDByxEEQ8Bj9OboXKQzwUTKwZ+0YnIEGd+RgJJ3nVF3qAqBWgsKt8R Dtj8apl8H3d9GNokYGvWPogTDh73WeCM6ISv/KrGlDiHUUKRJP7ThYdP6bjkdlCD2Coj32dDwNyu sCpoqFKgLUyaYxdc/5g1JBfQggbpn9YBsYCzM1fZHgdjSMlKYfD3QYzYhwcQEF7WOPi2yETfVx/R JtiZrBWSSvyz5yN+vEh6ggAU3CjRZAF77HIB3+zp0txXnzjwvAKPen3nPhyIvrlUnFtQ4HQrahkt cgTZDtzhsrlUmKreqfhd/bFWuO0HIPSwnUtEwx6jAO/0dRi6cgCOysqHVRsWgCtI/+8xXtJdJ1sP lPYUAyohcFsNDEtW7D1FkJMD6VHQDOzmAvk87Pzs/AU0bR5qX7uEQFfV7F0oTIzWnDp7CHPJyJPw 8HQk7AzE/yVL7ux0RIsbhdt1xyHUjkML3x26SoPo40DdvqpCSHQ4Ai5I2wQFi3Rm+Gn+cqMf0IcP 0+slfmNzQxiy710m69do7AbQJtaARf41sQgAdFiNp2TAAMg3nC/33rl4fA8vd2KvgKVQN04to7sk YI9ZFV3iB56O50Az149okXRg9zfn8UGIjAX8nUA993MRADZffBgkrhdXoB7Vpo4ZrKmJbUeBWSCo xJYTJAwgCQHvLDNYWZG7dPaC23ZCIYp5+xHYXHQVBGzxvcUvGMaEBSJcBQVPs88BQ69cOIsIG8hg kSsNAH9QMpjAzWmrlsFIXL9rkFa54kHiK5LZqw4xVsKXIRhWzYAbm8gPhpUBO2Nj5CafGSw3AjHA QA+Aj45fEQAOdJreH+B3qkYxRmZYQmCHSarBFY4XXarzNFdVifN1zhK+51I2izXWTdbNgk1GwK1T m7NlEKXsaRrT8ZEB6/h0WgLAwnnChr5TUR2N+MqSSZru6yihU/gI5OVsWBehXdY5XYLLJlXPmlja hF0klJVkZ7+aheYq5TC7FwZDkQi2zb2o86tOqFeqDZmQAAAvOvalV5gje0A4nAUt9jszSEchJDan FDyzPc0PqIglqVkgx4Z0IBgNMBgjgxB5rCUxAqgPIMggwHxEcAjBdQ8WO3c2+9coY9djeFlX9TVQ PMDDik39ECu2akQNQ4AL+l5WW/yowC1RC9e4goFiLXIQDhciUaFV3WY6J1NmFkoNAyVkTB/D8LKg k2jgJ2ogJ0jWBWMAXX7cor8AsNJfi8/38bhzET0ND0sALLjgWoR62vy3nCM8WSEFcwdogOvcXRPe rFw4rlBzC1iEuws5aHQsJSAaZ1fyeTxzJiQnMjVwiZH8JiXcJWlw3AA3G1RzBmA1e/bYdQRn3mho OywJ0BmbzJEeLtc2fFCB+sIKf1ImJ+Oc8IR9KQyDQXIqCzI+ydmTHnIXEhQKD4OoGrpmKD/GR+lD HB5C3txZigI4aNgrPHITt912SnNlQtAw60E/BwN7eCU3SGiY9/c2BDhjO7ts60FZPyWUWPJSnMBs kDMYAzQEAnap3GhIR1dLUAMlIgw7AxiVu0XAviQlWBEwpGoZ1QUD+f0wKzgrOM0lHH2A/P4EqM5E YHi5TQ5fn1TCBbL/Jfh7JQBFYYYAsgAniiIsA4gSpmma5lAAhIB8eHSapmmacGxoZGBcaZqmaVhU UExInfuZpkRAAAgVBwP4mqZplhTs5NzUzGmapmnEvLSspKZpmqaclIyEfJqmaZp0bGRcVExpmqZp RDgwKCCmoGGmGAAEmmV3uhATCAP4E/DoaZqmaeDc2NDIpmmapsC8uLCs2KZpmqSglIyEE180TWe2 lxMDbGRYmqY721ATq0A7ODAof5CmaSAYDAwb0UFCQXl22W0ARQO+vvlBAAFB8v/uKoEET177T0H1 SIxg+UAN+////xUpKDJhMTMuJjMgLGEiIC8vLjVhIyRhMzQvYSgCBWD/fwUOEmEsLiUkb0xMS2VB APsn5O0RBBMNQEKhQU5ASkBGzOvek2ZhUTEmLAMx3ZBv9gUXQ/c8RexsFuzBMx4MUQf2t+wNBgBP RUBBAJuET0UUERlxqFHEI91kI8qhJ3BhnVzZYP9bJwFzSNlgk9wx/F8nohFEdvIA/v+PpeF1J2BN SENIBO0/dCaUQoJjAvqyNDe3IlZpZ0y+Xuv/u//fAK04MwuAA3oTOKrhTr4ARgrsH5Aq2QfAQf/9 //+Mx+8BuMujaHvf/vvVSnZXEgYkrU/rI6ix/MwZ5////w7sPu8L2mAakZPKZ9qyludSSfAro1CO ZjVg5f/////qQXhcz6nUC63MlgdrUq0SUEKZRIi9RKl5tsjTviOi9P7//z9A92FvV9Qv24xMD3mc oDQOIV2wmiokMy8kLf//hQDYJS0ttrr+Ps5jZDJjRmRveWvr7vY5b2QitIZWNzhvLWY7Vf/7/38i KDUkQTnlK5YX9oapmjFhZa+PVvyA7k49tLv9//9rh8YGUgdx6UDUB7yZ2cEo7rYFyvAaHf+WI/// //8dyGNQ0SrSMNm8zwI452BJ9QgjZF+3AfIBgRAbH2f////P64b3qBxRbpcSVQVDwKfgmYm6kqan jKBgl0Z2//9f/oLGTJS1rFW3vhsERKii6Lnirr2YQ8bLDWvMA///w/94u77AtzDGYyDcTixNeaS8 Bav/5eiOnwohCv+f///6tzH9/v+HP9ppu2bgq8RxrpVEXMlFeJGVmKSP/P//2JqnuT3jXiQX7YUF Y2i11r5rAuZi1Xjh0vP///+9ghgaJNONTc48ta6+kBzFxA4/6S6hp22/VQJA/////+LgUEkPwz8S tnSze/z6k5Zr0JLHqkZNUFdESE9VRUr/////UY91nL5WR0tOVEFAQ0JCRUNARFAvxJpEREdGNm5A JDX/////H5q3t6AILzUsNQZDAi4vSSJPJb6s/qASNSAMFMwtZc3/v/3/wK19RHYSFxYrYRhygfcZ scz8+bx7cpqy6ofEdLf///+/SEBHdrg+GjlyD8FkQcqHEmqGEczFfHlulv4Rt//W/8oEPb4xRb5U xVFGeoLIBC1Oz/+BuXoG////mBuavL89lMzEeXkRKdNQY2m60GzZUG5lOP9/+//LzUQdtp6ev8G4 HTW6bjVOh8VEYx3J3UR4Rpr/////Pzo2ynxhaCskKzlCvpbCgUIjJUYhrPI+ygwlTu6JEAz///// KRlQYBOML/uYzHxMNcKFWWO3qPv+mytDEitCKf+BWl0S/7f/ub7s+pz+uClOjso8PcgcJf9BS6pQ /9/g/xwxrqQ+uj9lyhSlMcKjPszNTHm6y9VU4P///7G2tze6cVC+BDFDJXhEPZ3MYRIQESN6Kvce uv///9/bKRhZElEXUJ6ZQiA2WT7nTsGPYUSWXKDIHkUoef///2/4gVMtJ/E2KXQ3DEe+8p5axKl4 7MwE+UlZhVVW6f+3+K1crSsdF1tlST5OvCYpmo2waRcjv/3/f3sNRNVO3K3s4Fo6Aa1RPagHGBLy Qu1B7FVJ/////+U9Vks+RJ/n5T8QnEEtemCYn/aHSjE3RMpHpy2CGmrZX/j//1G4ZVpOzZYV93yY cV3WQjwtXuXMl7aiTXq3/////+7luBjinUz4HenVQdfKdHmTscOwl2t5ohHHLnkglE170P///zxR K1AYdIMvyrwEFYYEUQXCRhGYK0DBLIzs////v01MW33AJ5EBJZg/8nohxIE1VCu+vRUljCU9LBkp TL/B//+X2S0eor6Evx8awoQ1iIKqzKpLyq3CrW3//1v7Bq03aAeP0Vl1UdPWWr4gcUqRepLIFLkM /v+X/oZAFsq+roeoc4GpUHEWTRZJFBjCDLW+wiSO3+A3zQr2vfp+rMUEDkVhzv9v/P/MvSVJykWA egNNNQ1yk6g/UMo0uXhF1zVEA/////+XP6ovDj2yQnRgtcSTPUxWasSsgr41sEV6NZBFN2AEWv// ///XixhMMdJsCj9JTU5HEpf/+BfxKxhDekY92Ed/uS71tv3///+BPVcsJo65yEXYAsK6USzlHBr0 Kq3RtUGTqH6Zjjz/v/0vMxDCwUJOzMJP6WYA9pwsujwqygZ7DA9931j4/4krejnpEXJybtbQgQwY AcxCtopV/////zd4FtVfTXhxP1FRLqwumsF2Tai2cHqXPEZXz33ZAvL0//+/8LM+7TyGnz3Pvkfb MvaWPEV3MnK3GCoUaVsr/9/+/0n/VFddd7eVsgK1zFVxLSFWXDxOylDCgEXIFcT/rf//mXysq3M0 fi1AlVpSTBhIKydvWajfScl2Al3o////wodGerI9Z+Bs+fUxmrlghW2CsC4n9zhTfBgY+AX+Xw+x xH4DtGUSyhxJF/XKcRetz9/4/xdFjL4yTUlTWcq5ysS+ParnXzp2yg//////ywW4RWIywEpaGtHs QEUy4ECok+y6nHdO91tshknF+0T/////CUdNJy/e6jV9SMTzqZ1/Ie/ik52FA2FOw863gh4mVhH/ ////JlLLGCCMqjzYKp45IBsYeFfJvT8VquxHoL4+GAjKi4D/////oELMfVF6fzxSyj9FAY6xXz8g eHhJyD3EnXmnDg+Dcsb/////eZ0ydL1GoK/yfktHPe+YqlESRkODqlKeWcUeSUSrahc3/v+l4R3E tyoSqp41ZGdGocoHoCyZs3X/Rv//Hgl5Fy1PKR/WX3VxIz9hqbt2cpxyS2LR/wv//1BN9JosE834 xgFNRzRFlZkZ7CyoyokwQFQv/////zT37Fye2XE1TwNLwrsCq18fRqhJrl6BAaq5/3UWx0gC/sb/ S40xTmpJWK5L0VMfoOu8yDyxKUvSv/03hTSt1t1H8ux+VhdPBK/D2Qy0v8H/0lH1YPMsTr3E1eLK e2It+DJA//+3C84WRuW4uE2Zmj1ZT8oIT5hFwt28OVz/////TqpTbjJ8Uv+/MWxhKSVQxr0ss1hY xRq9jY00vRyDpw//L/X/M1BSUHe4kfHIgmpjKtkfHvvwlMPHs0h58L/A/9k1Cf+VdAQyMbYwiX2R Fhc8+cyt////v4Tea1XAeS4/WplKes9mKyV+trAFHjJL5Eqs4HHVnfT///8IQ0WigvfoyhpjJWVn FEo9Zaex8J9xmc9LKdl7///Lv0FhvnaevvbORnKs1sKKvnhpGD9+epw9YTr//4X/DfqFuuyx/w2Z /1J5//aBL5301izYLLgbPVX/S/z/cGC+dbE3ILpg5DRDyp9Llz2AElztgDcy/7/B/wQY5WeZFomv jNyRTrSxerTCqUIQKV15wHip9P+/4KP3bP2d/OnCvwF6R0k/Qv///5dNd/mc48VlvgVCwrjhT0st /p1VETwRH3qxPy//G/z/sZIlXj92+j9kGEvSXVTqVq67Pgo8QAcEv9H//3qvPZoC7UYphUhsHJ+d Hl/DfLcwUIGVQP+F//9NfH4Nhs4+USnRHkCifS+9KdrEnCGrbq/CeP/W//9tNUvbzV2T7kcrrxhJ jUVNiUlAdEW9JtGn1vr//1u3P2C6VBBzPttRvcHlRLwvB1/bbAQBee3f+Leul5Zw0YBMKW7Jk8Iv N1cizv//L/TOKVNdN0n0SXFjutjF7HH3aVRRwIOxY1P/////XCz3ExcE3pUXc4Sp2SjCkAFAGK9m fPscgb8VnhKHBIX/////Qhxv1oqELocnhjWJNoggiqQz+FaLM4okjR2MDI8slm3/////1iiOIpGQ bpMydorvKNuSlZSXZpYWmRzynXeYL16bJZrAC///nQ6cjDOaNGqfXp4CAqE0oEkcljXd//+/XqVq pH6nF06mqvvvKqlWqG6rBqp+rV6aRKz///8LJROusS/JHLD3tdssknS0b7e2N9+5uNnn9yr/0l/o u1K6NcoFlnu/bXoEgf5HTxG/S////65uS1xEkFnBOcKDAE8yWFVANG6nLEQ6iAUR2/+/wU9j7djs gDTmgVlBSUkxooqB4Cckhbr/9rQpAeepj5aGEyQmKDQKMm63///tM4GwBy+SSrOyN5EoIiQMJtvn ETMubb2h/7/9/zZ3N368MjsN+AypxsCIsU8JbIFtIVcbkcapVRL//3/rXeSIfqZxGYFsLLS8NEgB H8CFYIIiRva/bjH/////uiufHJ0AyEeOAR6qO5gBzaDieFYDyABRgYY3hjxWaEX+Rv//TF9KTQ3K XEULXrzewidJQU/5oV45uob/v/G3KjGSymztqlk3VdoMKw5KKbtaPGN3/xJ/4x6hqvZqK/JDowd0 lH2X9FqFFtv/Bv8RSXLtjzT+KXAiXDE+BOmIrOwAzFv8//ZuTY4R4nddU0MO974UFMgvWcjlYf9/ iYVgDMPyJ54rsD9ZM1z5/vKotyH/////7ONazAZOJll6vUePXDpJM0uVBshKBnf68Zr3P8ggXST/ /y/9UXKtBhRJSQz2YRRdZV2GTRGCca3Q7KBkUef9////5T5IFpuBxPGxqsQuFC+Zl5gZ+mk0VuWD 4VbBw9ubf4H/L0tRtkYayrp1AiU+kJ8REYZTCwJJ/4UL/RFsrfMuwdRFNDgUbXytPaBxRrzQ//9E EilRWL/c7GCcXnn90d9x8/Rl+0DxLX2DC4tLgBVUu1uDB4j///8LNhLLmcu6PbC3/gCCyrvKkICh USdIgKhD4MLb////4IRN/7LrHhqAHOT0nb4YpcI/TUE0s4YHTQOUmhJf+v9T7HchpyFTggo+Qm97 rI6CEgs4FCr0/6sPMYT3vFzRBnq4JGf/F/pb+B+OSUIHguzRFWA3OjHI4jRE/////5V5B0lii9Sb qWqJCoLua+72UwbzyB/0Dqp4/uYGh063/////3qOP0cKnoCiQhKakdkqvgOOyBdFNfPKigF0ATKg gfQY39rq/4Mm5IkqlYQsUGE/PMoMwFr7Ff////96SgE1eoM9CNkR0TmJvh/o+VOcNtoRVRiEesqG tpGHcv//N/jm/+y1eMc8Z1N2UWY9yl4seeJwRyh9gCb8W3yrKgxPF4tH71IYRvLYFxT///8vlAa2 ehbnc0YJFgh6gDVQcuL0LEpKiwKDNngtvIn/v/EXHyuDH0XM8+rqvk8eC2EKrAkGx/9/q3+64fqR Q3m/ufhm6tf8xypQOzl1OxA5of///61pEPVVRhgLtQis6y2xNGC4qcCk56JeiBwH//+/VVw1Q7aU BPW49izIyN6G/g10NJDCZ0Hj32ijK6RZIhy01UCqR5CK/7/9fzZdDDSvEWpccLcKPa2EV7aTcIeB RQg0tTua/y/Q4q9brXtpHMwvRV+EYaj0C0L6b///zXoNupivNRx6vN9ZI5JoH0nH+jpZNK43Vn+j ErcLH/rvhGwgWa18vhf6t/pqGSzu0J8eWV0OofR+f0UP/////zSabTvDaRJKw4VHmhJ4KKLzIXoB ck0quTQDRiB6MeY0/8b//994X1+sw1esEBbo2Uo8meX327naTWeL5fSb//+/9JyV28oNVMgNoM+L ZQ7lmb1e9jv30Jm5JVmC/v+l/5tfPZFnXJ3wHpDYFojQ5ydlImWdv5heCF/U4P/fBZE1DBbOvUO9 6ndyiB7IvWb63+Avrsngdht1X/krzKEAf2Uaki////8XBD2mj17UnVEhc3OdSQKxl3oCSmRV5sI8 RBg+2/9C/0as87UL8sXDKXhNEloRyT+WdtDN/////y6FI8VGcC2Ap0MXwMMOfMz9R/5XH6RCYywk ypIybBQxv8WN/tGhmng0CCA1SSptuB7DWf+g1NvbHbe9iT9PRNJT9dsb/f/fprdCW1hJgx2qP+Ka FKMVkdwViRVHQv9/62zIARes24pJek5bYpYvzJ9Bif/03+r/8tAhPd4pJiEJQwg2TT8NIeQCgv// /3cucXoMUZ4pyvGh/2cGSfpUPalgTV0Z3ELTFPUc/8b/W9LA6GH7jjmIiHL3NUdCF8FBJq1r6f8X /ji6vhw7bVRI011dGDkXFyceVR3DGnnf+v9/Q7kWB3qHnx85aoLXRT9EM7U1Bfw+fgyW/y/0/2RI F9wX3ZUS9pSu6upR3Dy9N1tUVBkXRv////+TNlRwzdbhDe+q6hImGDH9I8y2VYgARRd3/DVIERBu VdX/G/xEWWyDWaep2zGwJSfNJoXRFuE3KPC/v+3RvPxRzRfpg8aty0C/8P//xZ2fEYsAqYTJQDOr RDJaeSmGL0tGWmqLyRT/t///4hRLWQ7MjyKvcYcTgVjQZR+8BM0xTeYLJy2uiF/g//+fV1IONItP Qqkk3TsH8BgplMwRFGNK8fT+L/T/QRPs9GNN+YQ48qt223KBeUI1YAHBfUK//f+3Q7hXQoLLCb4x 6N477U33RoeKIUCj6Fdf4Nv/HE2p0AsSEyL3FI5E4r1hOKyAva7f6C/0gFU/C1m5CvS+U8N7RKl9 ry/1/1v/cz1Lvpz+eqOAcapby19bUsH/v9T/oOket5jYWohaNku2vrhhWABCi3XJTwfJ//+/xKFi HYVOvrtNNPi9F9DZsS0lGYLyEcL+Bf//L/WaVUFCekBiBCaGAVLNHj866oyuR0m/nfv1/wv/2U03 FXNRySxMqin8FurkQUtNYJ97S////y+32aoSsuTj1w+sGsRNBNhTGDwFqYz8xbhP2aRH/1Lf+kQ5 NlOa+fStZYhBtdJC5E5g1db/rf53bbCJ2TlDwFSqT9HKpahvoU73/gsX+JlLyz3x1Ca+Z01Mycw+ urf9//+lUkM1aAo1VkNKtpdKzHK2QoeqaWS5Pir/L/RLiJ5yn6pcQ7aSYp68g/qPvGK/wv//20qe SlZOn/Ritkqfz575EMsq18zZr0J8//+t/4CcL/6xGGoMaStFkq/KSZKhRa1CnMHo+oF/g///SrHz QifDcx9A423E6G5MentiwNcZAWK1/f///09HZJ8j6ElZmQrKlxoZooOaV7x5xgs0tx+Igzs0mf// /y90dgFReS1sbvDvFvtRyoBCbZjkLMBuQ36Ao0Kt4////8hTMg6emaMDoSsBBh76XEAPVfsRoeRq 6J4zDJL//9+qU1VkVxBxs7TLVVDJVUkAPMkHLtMzs/+NfuvMCLyCa4S3WhdDgjJhx0kiA1r+/1/q rafoQIBbwlK54fGQxPp4HDCi3p43ntf8v9QNng9qv1ULzDUQQpbLRdyR+L/FG51LyUWOijO0Rhye CYB1l////99BTlH4A57EbPf3eSdHzuteUfwwaqbbvRj6+VL5wf+/1P/8jJEuCTNCKzkY1RA0AvGX Rs65EUpSbiB86///GWPBahXOVUfI9QEvU80qFlQHGhKVekSj+tb/b/FcABLor0RJRna0ovg2oHSG 4lYb/2+UK6fgQVwogbzBtha/ArlE/i/9/4LfZ04n4ENagMHEj82JPta5GNmhcoCCHX//9v+tMsCg xOw03qvAuERLVyREV7ksPE3p/////wNWRr/oUWRCzp+fR7G+fEVR7TURBzoZND2CEBf/4SMX/43e +rc0SksYGesds57tWxEJ9h2ee9/iF/hEIxmqTgpfEL55ZumRtplaN/pb/4FCHxj5Ce5KT7V8x9Er fZvGLvr///+SlsxAXFFQEW5FEXW2z68sWZIfRU7E4+pqcRq6D/8X/jc5emBTzqzGPFHfpFcRbVc0 OMpRFsH0t/jt1hxrw3QRBE7RWJ4hJCffp/9f4m8sJ2GnSzYZGRvAW+LtEVpAWf2H7Vv8//9QiRRM ZZ848VxUN3IW+StpyzwoGr8bg1/4BRb6jXmJW3pjQyupG4AGp////5dVYWhfkCmM5VC0GXuQgw7/ I9RRYh+rG8RJMpD9X/r/lkCQq40sMvURYKsEvXa6rpyvTv6OYUVQ/63+S2VwaoDkfQYnwFGe7OI3 PaUJ2Pv/X/hqB8zDBvIx+p6z+0cSCWt9R0UBnkKKyT6N/v9/LLxJc4gntpiaC/UaK2y0k4McA07e dP9f4P9IO4Cq/9ePR1yE1WwqNfcN1nqFYcqy/CX/////29jl6ZeQd4k5UZKpSreasJzuzNRX5XFc Y08UqUvK3EH//8L/bGBc65FNbvEEBg5dqf9PASc0uuMKqzOxVC3/X1jos7cE6v0YNXbMzATUwveK 6kSmf4m/9ffIIgnGRZsTpv8xEEGAqykMOf////80qNEna6GdSuskprHuTWHVfm8OXaz3tNSkulFh EB3LlP//b/+4Wgo3wA6nNBMFqEVxVtTumrLRDa48sXO2PK2txP9f4oaHwuEa4FCavLfHSPqgBgRo Rv//37oFrZ6oqfn08CYeSEOtfXCqfJG3J+esrapf4v+lMbFCcw4puF+q7jjZzY01HWouUl/g/zc8 c4GkyQSlwzH/1Vo6nL/L/7/A/1A9bJedl1lNIZxHXqtX7fggRBlhSRylof///1gvbnmqZzwxGGM0 pO4VN1jgVDApjUFBa2Ev/7/Uf0i/2qdpzVFApSAlBygtJFhBvx8SJDX///9GRi4oLvK37fxOFjMo RlsCM2RKLqQe9wBmf6m/1AYVuCoCLjRMLc+ct4D3M1cE8P//L1YkLDERaClMCfB+mi9wMQd3JEjS L/Uv7S4iY7+nn5rfSSQyMlVgl7j9/zIkCSAvJQ5/+oQ+RSQvIiD+Lr8JgP9WQK0lNC05DyAslv+/ wH8lJTOCj0OnBIkA6i2XJ5wVKUclPaM/1v///xuIvyyyMTgNLl0NKCMzIDM4c8RunCHYALggTi70 //8zEkkvTMH2JhMOIyswVQQ5w5FfvAUk60v8BRoueShXC9hcAhcgLcTf4P9/Sob3JG0ATg4xWwok OE/mmB2uTnXnNfi3f4lRSbE2MjEzMSe6PW2K83SxT//ud9/QUVJ18wt4RVZIQIMJU0xDMkm3v0j/ GfXSODguDUBDIk+z5RhlQ1H/L/0Gx0EngI+PzVpFckYZdhq3EU17pf7//2lRRhHPZFpHQi1uGFZh 7VdBJf1f8U5KHbxwq//FOQQnY9G/NyCqRWJ6IW8l/f8vLQMg9qUqTQoBV4FBwSC6Rc1xQo/MiQN5 RhRhviGoY/+3bRFtzAWBvr4Wwoy+qlHRAMt74/+NRzJGBkCaNEbKX8KvvU8zrPlBK90O2BFQgQwy rioOpS7BBzKlcIhzM0zhHdi3ukk9wo41NciEL4jCQvaEDDRhABxMC/y3f8KAQ8C8QbKVwpBAzFVu wrz5TkrxRu7LQwOUpLaoIov+0v8N9EPCg0XIRsKGRcIINrBAjqgNl9i67xYfyLb4NanLKW3NQDbB wm/1tsF+QFbKRsseRVSpNvj9vw6BUceFaLnBqqlAsTtEyGmYt98a5f9MI0iBNQTKJ8zFdd92hXEY 67IRH0m+1yUL1Mv//9ZOSR2dyLg4Rk72RgYRBvgWCbPvFCk3278zN0bIQsKCRaqZEC0gqAJEBeaq +b4AuZBbowMTJTHYIWmGpDXnPddcYJvwxTFX/Ysfgww2SJupB7dJqvQjAHVBCgQTD5yPUf8X9gUN DUEABRcAEQgDQRQSuckHaxoKFhJzHjFtg9VqTe5OAA0GXK8taPCHIoGsYCy21Q9IKBAMQedqtbbA As6/Ow2oSvgvMCgvNScA8xRFWEVEgYDAGo0WCAjkAQAwCgAkUQW/aSYgqBwBRmluZENEAaDybG9z ZRtEzN4V1FNpemUX73/7TEwRQQ5NYXBWaWV3T2YPbm9hbw5Vbm0QLgNycyJud8MvS0VudhBvbnar io5dViJhYhg5iLgdRAx2ZdrukYqYDn1UaW1GKuKstVcaC1FDotu697ELe3BeZy1Mw25fIH5MaWJy TnlBIfZMULRQYyhLxkQ5tv1iYWxBbAZjWExhtz3sVNMqTXUDeCgbm7VbbBdyYw9+sHQQB/vnWlYd RkNvcHnFRGXahzdrBoMXJUhh5wsg3cKdRVNj2XY7+WxlblTfcFAvaA1hCwrDVytYRB2zt0VE8W/K kbZQxMlweU2RbFt2Z4IiTRNFeGlCQfFi3WhxZB/xvVnAJv8vmY33hg27BWVwoTZCN+LCw7Azblqc ZUl7EXGiy/sXbCD8XnIYVG+TFYaZorhMqQ68JXsTYhENCGNrQ4VvT0RyAeNkZUNop9xdRGw0TW9C eXQiEhQnIpyeua+1LQpjmDYqUqCyvSfhVEdQb2koGUh7wWbtcEYmXL0TGYRDmDDoOm5FTLisMGkJ aZwWpCImBDpNGDPXOEN1GH0ZOiQ5YW9rpURlLJWEIMWVaLXHHuObwGcbS2V5DE9w69yjazELRWoO gFZbvQAadnVlD4vM3KWEESl1bTAMT7PNJrc/ZML4baCiYW6Hc2UwijcXa4xyEPYHaXNkvfZcCXoZ 8s4QFKJ4rltQCCI5N6ErMyphKiECSg9ms1TNIAGhVVwPFrDfTkJ1ZmZBDwtMb3f2GbYjd3ZJcpQj dwqFm3Fa9MwMTYLCAKhtWbZN17fYYkD/BAITC2VZlmU0FxIQA6tlWZYPCRRzOb//hLw8UEVMAQPg AA8BCwEHrnvSbBNyKoAyBBADgmxnsZA1CwIzBJlb0s0HDNAeNHvZG9gQBwYAwHkIQIBbZHgCGAVG uMJ2K2R4AR4uL9iToJikcJDrNn+7sAQjIAtgLmRhdGGYI+5CusH7Iid2QL3NYBuFLuUJAMPABny/ KXs0J0AbsHsNlAAASkE8CQAAAP8AAAAAAGC+AJBQAI2+AID//1eDzf/rEJCQkJCQkIoGRogHRwHb dQeLHoPu/BHbcu24AQAAAAHbdQeLHoPu/BHbEcAB23PvdQmLHoPu/BHbc+QxyYPoA3INweAIigZG g/D/dHSJxQHbdQeLHoPu/BHbEckB23UHix6D7vwR2xHJdSBBAdt1B4seg+78EdsRyQHbc+91CYse g+78Edtz5IPBAoH9APP//4PRAY0UL4P9/HYPigJCiAdHSXX36WP///+QiwKDwgSJB4PHBIPpBHfx Ac/pTP///16J97kBAQAAigdHLOg8AXf3gD8BdfKLB4pfBGbB6AjBwBCGxCn4gOvoAfCJB4PHBYnY 4tmNvgDAAACLBwnAdEWLXwSNhDAU5QAAAfNQg8cI/5aM5QAAlYoHRwjAdNyJ+XkHD7cHR1BHuVdI 8q5V/5aQ5QAACcB0B4kDg8ME69j/lpTlAABh6SNE//8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAgADAAAAIAAAgA4AAACQAACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAEAAABAAACAAgAAAGgA AIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEACQQAAFgAAADY8AAA6AIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB AAkEAACAAAAAxPMAACgBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAADQAACAqAAAgAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAQAJBAAAwAAAAPD0AAAiAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABADAA4MAAACgAAAAgAAAAQAAAAAEABAAA AAAAgAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAACAAAAAgIAAgAAAAIAAgACAgAAAwMDAAICA gAAAAP8AAP8AAAD//wD/AAAA/wD/AP//AAD///8AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIiIiIiIiIiIiIiIiIgAAAj/// /////////////4AAAIf///////////////eAAACPf/////////////9/gAAAj/f////////////3 /4AAAI//f///////////f/+AAACP//f/////////9///gAAAj///f////////3///4AAAI////f/ //////f///+AAACP//93d3d3d3d3f///gAAAj//3f39/f39/f3f//4AAAI//d/f39/f39/f3f/+A AACP939/f39/f39/f3f/gAAAh3f39/f39/f39/f3d4AAAI9/f39/f39/f39/f3+AAACP//////// ////////AAAACP//////////////8AAAAACP/////////////wAAAAAACP////////////AAAAAA AACP//////////8AAAAAAAAACP/////////wAAAAAAAAAACP////////AAAAAAAAAAAACP////// 8AAAAAAAAAAAAACP/////wAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIiIiIgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD////////////////AAAADwAAAA8AAAAPAAAAD wAAAA8AAAAPAAAADwAAAA8AAAAPAAAADwAAAA8AAAAPAAAADwAAAA8AAAAPAAAADwAAAB+AAAA/w AAAf+AAAP/wAAH/+AAD//wAB//+AA///wAf//+AP/////////////////8jDAAAoAAAAEAAAACAA AAABAAQAAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgAAAgAAAAICAAIAAAACAAIAAgIAA AMDAwACAgIAAAAD/AAD/AAAA//8A/wAAAP8A/wD//wAA////AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAACP//////8AAIj/////+AAAj4////+PAACP+P//+P8AAI+PiIiPjwAAiPf39/f4AACPf39/ f38AAAj39/f38AAAAI9/f38AAAAACPf38AAAAAAAiIiAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA//8AAP// AADAAQAAwAEAAMABAADAAQAAwAEAAMABAADAAQAAwAEAAOADAADwBwAA+A8AAPwfAAD//wAA//8A APDEAAAAAAEAAgAgIBAAAQAEAOgCAAABABAQEAABAAQAKAEAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC89QAA jPUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMn1AACc9QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1vUAAKT1AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADh 9QAArPUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOz1AAC09QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD29QAABPYAABT2 AAAAAAAAIvYAAAAAAAAw9gAAAAAAADj2AAAAAAAAOQAAgAAAAABLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAQURWQVBJ MzIuZGxsAE1TVkNSVC5kbGwAVVNFUjMyLmRsbABXUzJfMzIuZGxsAABMb2FkTGlicmFyeUEAAEdl dFByb2NBZGRyZXNzAABFeGl0UHJvY2VzcwAAAFJlZ0Nsb3NlS2V5AAAAbWVtc2V0AAB3c3ByaW50 ZkEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAxC1ZHvt6p+Q7 KGAhO03n/TvxIV47DqBwO7/0EzusyBo7kyGyBMTfSGh8FkwExN4qaHwWS85s3k9ofBZSaHwWU6CW kGvzeWDi831uhfN5YOWfwW4TVeKX91VOlYWYbxPsaqqmMjyrqFtV/VipE/1qglX9a4Ix5ht5n1Vc o59VXLUbP/197sYG5CRoA+TrDBbp9PgEoPTZxwL0+gmH9PoOHXELgV2BdGLgns2H6J5I+/ie5nDw nu271J7Hv4yewS8jb+4On5/deiKf3/yQgAowTJ+Z4rWf1/9EgCG2boCoulpvaKAHn1FRd58eFAGA L2qMn1BTR4CuhfKfJ0p1nydMTXCr+iCfQz4+gJIODp9lB8mfZQkEn+rvo59xoLWA3BZIb4TF24BB PB2f8ymjgELgooBi/0yAQ586n88Yc5/5fpxu8Okxno1fv4EU1G2ewQXensNt855JasCBNRCQgTja qnCjpn6Ax+Wzn9ZFrp+feFOf1ti8gJmBJYDAH/KAklJ2/C7fMxPgIzITEunEDBUlxAwU+0cMfSHW E+LggZgBUP9wETEHgCjC6p/bnNqf1z/0gCsbn5/3C2OAIsuXn96PrnFyOD+Bs+LDnpr58p63y26e TpavgUFbUZ4bow+eMbJNciijLp0UDU+CEosanQZanp1rIf+dFH0ynfOJn4L+o8ZwgdfGn8YDUYD/ IFaAslEmgM4y74DllHyfwrtCnw3oA3GfssyeWkmwnthn3YHrpqueeYhunthmnZ5VnICeeZg2iEUU 9GejKll4IVcL7GpmLmcNoQjsaoupeDr2DWcNqdlx5HyBnj6wXZ4rySeeLtIeno0IQp7YumWB3Y4O niJYoG/euvyf71M0n6gJM4AEjwef7dlvgAR04oAZ6hKAFlQwcHjJi4AcRHafkIIZgGMEcp+QgpSA S0hkn70zep9ED2xwE2udn9lFE4BAlU2AIoC4gCKBo5/7qNmAKpfnn1S6QHAQm2+f2jUkgCliMIBT z6ufy7HCnyxeMYDZ+Ref1o72/W0bDBIq0W4SUeXQEospqplCVgoNVOBKEoklURK3eWxx9grmnrHE xIHH4WSeMC/fnizHM54z+FOetRQHnhA8LW/uZH+ANU6VgAYvM4ArndSf15e/n9eQJIA0BZ2f14Xj c4EbxZzCladYC2w7g7sO1061c+WDuelgF66IDJxYwfEytIUo3X4rxN3zVGTdXEHcwv9AMsJsV3hc cdZSnNLP6bMhTA9cHzGOXPi6xFzvuaNc7rrUHUUs0Vxi3u5DXhNXbr2ZA57Z3c6e7mDonoe6zJ5F vpGehG3kgWf4i4H+H205dg4U1hL1tNav+sLJACOm1lj/mslP/FAfi61byRhCiDBK+cEAJSLY34VD rd+NASHfjPR2wHmJTt+FQ5ffrsb2cI/NEp9BOYufSeg+n0nY/p9nDiifVOdugPl+iJ9VrPQiXZWA 0pT1CM25qJ7NkiwiH1D5Jc2XuxvSICw2zZIruy7RMRPBH+113uDQK8H/yPkuxN30LrvxQy4LZKou dSV9zAvxlDw4G048MgJAn+TGasxupKIz65d0M9+3hDN3BAdQSwECFAAKAAAAAAAGPSU0tUhr7KBw AACgcAAADwAAAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb24uc2NyUEsFBgAAAAABAAEAPQAAAM1w AAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EE800BB5.590FADC2-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 20:56:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 71243 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 20:56:45 -0000 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (151.155.5.143) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 20:56:45 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] ifan [85.210.23.223] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 1.6 $ on Linux via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:56:15 -0700 Message-ID: <43BD87EE.7060104@solet.co.uk> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:56:14 +0000 From: Ifan Jones User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Disable failure notices References: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there anyway I can disable qmail from sending a failure notice? I have a rather complex situation between sites (and companies!) where they insist on global groups that include users that don't exist on this particular server. Alternatively thsi could be a fetchmail issue but not really sure.... From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 21:47:37 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 26681 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 21:48:10 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (1de6f1050ebc34807c4172a7078d312ba78d0235@70.64.60.7) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 21:48:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2518 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2006 21:47:39 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 4bd8c6f52308c6bffb686745d52876437981d16b Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:47:37 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Disable failure notices Message-ID: <20060105214737.GA2454@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> <43BD87EE.7060104@solet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BD87EE.7060104@solet.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Ifan Jones wrote: > Is there anyway I can disable qmail from sending a failure notice? Everything's possible, but completely disabling bounces is a very bad idea -- you'll never have any indication if a given message had a typo in its recipient addresses, or if the intended recipient was over quota, or ... > I have a rather complex situation between sites (and companies!) where they > insist on global groups that include users that don't exist on this > particular server. That's a different kettle of fish, and should be solved in a different manner. If you look in the qmail list archives, you'll see many discusses of various approaches to distributing a domain across various sites, each with its own server. qmail-ldap is one way to go; using named sub-domains with vanilla qmail and some intelligent .qmail file handling is another, more administration-intensive way to do this. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 3 18:48:58 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 43470 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 18:49:54 -0000 Received: from web52403.mail.yahoo.com (206.190.48.166) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 18:49:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 71603 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jan 2006 18:48:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MA9cXx3vXJ2PxM/DFJVaioCQgGQ6mjM1trDFqNHpvdz4+Nsj5hWGUPUn1zyNKPwWDYbl/5zmCo4VUNTJZNShtHdpHNJXwxBBXikzLI49ifux17cHAo7NhAKWOdhWh2KdfFSA2KPFs0Iu1r9ldwT0tsWfc+C95wrakZmpD/IqVvY= ; Message-ID: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.92.184.91] by web52403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:48:58 PST Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:48:58 -0800 (PST) From: Glow Nair Subject: Single instance storage (SIS) in qmail To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Has anyone implemented Single Instance Storage (SIS) in qmail ? (For eg. attachments sent to multiple recipients saved once rather than multiple times) Any link/help would be appreciated. Thanks __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 21:47:09 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 27018 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 21:48:31 -0000 Received: from omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com (144.140.82.155) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 21:48:31 -0000 Received: from c21729 ([144.133.71.228]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with SMTP id <20060105214733.BQJT15112.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@c21729> for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 21:47:33 +0000 Reply-To: From: "Michael Nardella" To: Subject: RE: Spamcontrol rejecting all mail Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:47:09 +1100 Message-ID: <000001c61241$99fd5b10$0a00a8c0@eburwd2.vic.optusnet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6129D.CD6F59B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <2ad474000601050320v1166c01ev827f3b345bd3ba0e@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6129D.CD6F59B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----Original Message----- From: .. [mailto:theguru1@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2006 10:20 PM To: theguru1@optusnet.com.au Cc: Erwin Hoffmann; qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Spamcontrol rejecting all mail On 1/5/06, Michael < HYPERLINK = "mailto:theguru1@optusnet.com.au"theguru1@optusnet.com.au> wrote:=20 At 13:49 04.01.2006 +1100, .. wrote: >Running Freebsd 6.0 with qmail 1.03 under tcpserver. No problems in the = past runinng several virtual domains. Run spamcontrol install without = issue except I >now get all mail rejected (including virtuals) with message >"Reject: RCPT::Failed_Recptto.... >Recipients files are in place.=20 >I've read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply = can not get this to work properly. The least you should do would is to post the output of "qmail-showctl". regards.=20 --eh. I have changed over to Outlook as it appears Gmail & the list are not = very compatible. I hope the following is better than the garbled mess that = comes back from the list with gmail. Thank you for your response and my apologies for leaving off some information to begin with. qmail-showctl follows. I disabled the badmailfrom to limit the output. qmail home directory: /var/qmail.=20 user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 120. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 81, 82, 83, 0, 84, 85, 86, 87. group ids: 81, 82. authsenders: (Default.) No authenticated SMTP senders.=20 badhelo: (Default.) Any HELO/EHLO greeting is allowed. badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. badloadertypes: (Default.) Any loader types are accepted. badloadertypes.cdb: (Default.) No effect.=20 badmimetypes: (Default.) Any MIME types are accepted. badmimetypes.cdb: (Default.) No effect. badrcptto: (Default.) Any RCPT TO is allowed. bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.=20 bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. bouncemaxbytes: Bounce size limit is 2500 bytes. concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10.=20 concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote concurrency is 20. databytes: SMTP DATA limit is 2000000 bytes. defaultdomain: Default domain name is HYPERLINK = "http://abcd.com.au"abcd.com.au. defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.=20 envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au . idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au . locals: Messages for localhost are delivered locally. Messages for HYPERLINK = "http://localhost.abcd.com.au"localhost.abcd.com.au are delivered = locally. Messages for HYPERLINK = "http://michae34.lnk.telstra.net"michae34.lnk.telstra.net are delivered = locally. Messages for HYPERLINK "http://TheGuru.abcd.com.au"TheGuru.abcd.com.au = are delivered locally. Messages for HYPERLINK "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au = are delivered locally. Messages for HYPERLINK "http://ns.abcd.com.au"ns.abcd.com.au are = delivered locally. Messages for HYPERLINK "http://mail.abcd.com.au"mail.abcd.com.au are = delivered locally. Messages for michael are delivered locally.=20 me: My name is HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. moreipme: (Default.) No additional IP addresses are me. notipme: (Default.) All of my IP addresses are me. percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.=20 plusdomain: Plus domain name is HYPERLINK = "http://abcd.com.au"abcd.com.au. qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 = seconds. rcpthosts: SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at localhost. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://abcd.com.au"abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://michae34.lnk.telstra.net"michae34.lnk.telstra.net. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://TheGuru.abcd.com.au"TheGuru.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://ns.abcd.com.au"ns.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://mail.abcd.com.au"mail.abcd.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://nardella.com"nardella.com. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://nardella.com.au"nardella.com.au . SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://nard.com.au"nard.com.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://pro-motion.com"pro-motion.com. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://oepmg.org.au"oepmg.org.au. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at HYPERLINK = "http://nardella.biz"nardella.biz. morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect.=20 recipients: SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in /users/recipients.cdb. SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in /users/nardella.com.cdb. SMTP clients may send messages to local recipients listed in=20 /users/nardella.com.au.cdb. smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 HYPERLINK = "http://theguru.abcd.com.au"theguru.abcd.com.au. smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. = timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. virtualdomains: Virtual domain: nardella.com:nardella.com Virtual domain: oepmg.org.au:oepmg Virtual domain: nardella.com.au:nardella.com Virtual domain: nardella.biz:nardella.com Virtual domain: nard.com.au:nardella.com Virtual domain: pro-motion.com:nardella.com tarpitcount: Actual Tarpitcount: 5. tarpitdelay: Actual Tarpitdelay: 10. defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. badmailfrom.bak: I have no idea what this file does. concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does.=20 recipients.cdb: I have no idea what this file does. validrcptto.cdb: I have no idea what this file does. validrcptto: I have no idea what this file does. - -=A0=A0- Thanks Michael Any further information that would help with a solution? =A0 Michael =A0 In the absence of current assistance I have removed spamcontrol and gone = back to a standard qmail (patched) setup.=20 As=A0I=A0was the subject of heavy dictionary attacks on the server it = would be appreciated if=A0 some help on getting spamcontrol working was = available or maybe a suggestion of some other solution. =A0 Thank you=A0in anticipation. =A0 Michael --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.13/221 - Release Date: = 4/01/2006 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6129D.CD6F59B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-----Original = Message-----
From: ..=20 [mailto:theguru1@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2006 = 10:20=20 PM
To: theguru1@optusnet.com.au
Cc: Erwin Hoffmann;=20 qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Spamcontrol rejecting all=20 mail

On 1/5/06, Michael=20 <theguru1@optusnet.com.au>= =20 wrote:=20
At=20 13:49 04.01.2006 +1100, .. wrote:
>Running Freebsd 6.0 with = qmail 1.03=20 under tcpserver. No problems in the
past runinng several virtual = domains. Run spamcontrol install without issue
except I >now = get all=20 mail rejected (including virtuals) with message
>"Reject:=20 RCPT::Failed_Recptto....
>Recipients files are in place. =
>I've=20 read everything and tried a number of possible fixes but simply = can
not=20 get this to work properly.

The least you should do would is = to post=20 the output of "qmail-showctl".


regards. =
--eh.


I=20 have changed over to Outlook as it appears Gmail & the list are = not=20 very
compatible. I hope the following is better than the garbled = mess=20 that comes
back from the list with gmail.


Thank you = for your=20 response and my apologies for leaving off some
information to = begin=20 with.

qmail-showctl follows. I disabled the badmailfrom to = limit the=20 output.



qmail home directory: /var/qmail. =
user-ext=20 delimiter: -.
paternalism (in decimal): 2.
silent concurrency = limit:=20 120.
subdirectory split: 23.
user ids: 81, 82, 83, 0, 84, 85, = 86,=20 87.
group ids: 81, 82.

authsenders: (Default.) No = authenticated=20 SMTP senders.

badhelo: (Default.) Any HELO/EHLO greeting is=20 allowed.

badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is=20 allowed.

badloadertypes: (Default.) Any loader types are=20 accepted.

badloadertypes.cdb: (Default.) No effect.=20

badmimetypes: (Default.) Any MIME types are=20 accepted.

badmimetypes.cdb: (Default.) No = effect.

badrcptto:=20 (Default.) Any RCPT TO is allowed.

bouncefrom: (Default.) = Bounce user=20 name is MAILER-DAEMON.

bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host = name is theguru.abcd.com.au.

bounc= emaxbytes:=20 Bounce size limit is 2500 bytes.

concurrencylocal: (Default.) = Local=20 concurrency is 10.

concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote = concurrency=20 is 20.

databytes: SMTP DATA limit is 2000000=20 bytes.

defaultdomain: Default domain name is abcd.com.au.

defaulthost: = (Default.)=20 Default host name is theguru.abcd.com.au.

doubl= ebouncehost:=20 (Default.) 2B recipient host: theguru.abcd.com.au.

doubl= ebounceto:=20 (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.

envnoathost: = (Default.)=20 Presumed domain name is theguru.abcd.com.au.

heloh= ost:=20 (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is theguru.abcd.com.au = .

idhost:=20 (Default.) Message-ID host name is theguru.abcd.com.au.

local= iphost:=20 (Default.) Local IP address becomes theguru.abcd.com.au=20 .

locals:
Messages for localhost are delivered=20 locally.
Messages for localhost.abcd.com.au are = delivered=20 locally.
Messages for michae34.lnk.telstra.net = are=20 delivered locally.
Messages for TheGuru.abcd.com.au are = delivered=20 locally.
Messages for theguru.abcd.com.au are = delivered=20 locally.
Messages for ns.abcd.com.au=20 are delivered locally.
Messages for mail.abcd.com.au are delivered=20 locally.
Messages for michael are delivered locally.

me: = My name=20 is theguru.abcd.com.au.

morei= pme:=20 (Default.) No additional IP addresses are me.

notipme: = (Default.) All=20 of my IP addresses are me.

percenthack: (Default.) The = percent hack=20 is not allowed.

plusdomain: Plus domain name is abcd.com.au.

qmqpservers: = (Default.) No=20 QMQP servers.

queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in = the queue=20 is 604800 seconds.

rcpthosts:
SMTP clients may send = messages to=20 recipients at localhost.
SMTP clients may send messages to = recipients at=20 abcd.com.au.
SMTP clients may = send=20 messages to recipients at michae34.lnk.telstra.net.SMTP=20 clients may send messages to recipients at TheGuru.abcd.com.au.
SMTP = clients=20 may send messages to recipients at theguru.abcd.com.au.
SMTP = clients=20 may send messages to recipients at ns.abcd.com.au.
SMTP clients = may send=20 messages to recipients at mail.abcd.com.au.
SMTP = clients may=20 send messages to recipients at nardella.com.
SMTP clients may = send=20 messages to recipients at nardella.com.au .
SMTP = clients may send=20 messages to recipients at nard.com.au.
SMTP clients may = send messages=20 to recipients at pro-motion.com.
SMTP=20 clients may send messages to recipients at oepmg.org.au.
SMTP clients may = send=20 messages to recipients at nardella.biz.

morercpthosts: = (Default.) No effect.

morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No = effect.=20

recipients:
SMTP clients may send messages to local = recipients=20 listed in
/users/recipients.cdb.
SMTP clients may send = messages to=20 local recipients listed in
/users/nardella.com.cdb.
SMTP = clients may=20 send messages to local recipients listed in=20
/users/nardella.com.au.cdb.

smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP = greeting: 220 theguru.abcd.com.au.

smtpr= outes:=20 (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes.

timeoutconnect: = (Default.) SMTP=20 client connection timeout is 60 seconds.

timeoutremote: = (Default.)=20 SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds.

timeoutsmtpd: = (Default.)=20 SMTP server data timeout is 1200 = seconds.

virtualdomains:
Virtual=20 domain: nardella.com:nardella.com
Virtual domain:=20 oepmg.org.au:oepmg
Virtual domain:=20 nardella.com.au:nardella.com
Virtual domain:=20 nardella.biz:nardella.com
Virtual domain:=20 nard.com.au:nardella.com
Virtual domain:=20 pro-motion.com:nardella.com

tarpitcount: Actual Tarpitcount:=20 5.

tarpitdelay: Actual Tarpitdelay: = 10.

defaultdelivery: I=20 have no idea what this file does.

badmailfrom.bak: I have no = idea=20 what this file does.

concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what = this=20 file does.

recipients.cdb: I have no idea what this file=20 does.

validrcptto.cdb: I have no idea what this file=20 does.

validrcptto: I have no idea what this file = does.

-=20 = -  -
Thanks

Michael


Any further information that would help with a solution?
 
Michael
 

In the absence of = current=20 assistance I have removed spamcontrol and gone back to a standard = qmail=20 (patched) setup.

As I was = the subject=20 of heavy dictionary attacks on the server it would be appreciated = if =20 some help on getting spamcontrol working was available or maybe a = suggestion=20 of some other solution.

 

Thank you in=20 anticipation.

 

Michael


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.13/221 - Release Date: = 4/01/2006

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6129D.CD6F59B0-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 22:59:53 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 11446 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 23:00:26 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (db0029914ccdcb1aa4dd77b892f0cc0039c74313@70.64.60.7) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 23:00:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 3156 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2006 22:59:55 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 235566507916bb721fd2992b1ee1b73eec694b60 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:59:53 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Single instance storage (SIS) in qmail Message-ID: <20060105225953.GA3140@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Glow Nair wrote: > Has anyone implemented Single Instance Storage (SIS) in qmail ? (For eg. > attachments sent to multiple recipients saved once rather than multiple > times) Messages with attachments and more than one recipient will be stored as a single "instance" for as long as the message is in the queue. After delivery, it's no longer up to qmail how the messages are stored. I'm not sure how you propose to store a message such that two different local users share an instance when they can each modify it. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 22:25:01 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 72358 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 22:25:33 -0000 Received: from shire.bradfordfamily.org (HELO a.mx.bradfordfamily.org) (85@166.70.45.18) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 22:25:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10211 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 22:25:02 -0000 Received: from sicilia.bradipo.org (bradipo@166.70.45.29) by shire.bradfordfamily.org with QMQP; 5 Jan 2006 22:25:02 -0000 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Disable failure notices X-message-flag: Outlook: A PROGRAM TO SPREAD VIRUSES, BUT IT CAN DO EMAIL TOO X-image-url: http://www.xmission.com/~bradipo/pictures/mugshot1sm.jpg X-URL: http://www.xmission.com/~bradipo/ References: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> <43BD87EE.7060104@solet.co.uk> <20060105214737.GA2454@discworld.dyndns.org> In-reply-to: <20060105214737.GA2454@discworld.dyndns.org> Comments: In-reply-to Charles Cazabon message dated "Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:47:37 -0600." Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:25:01 -0700 From: Andy Bradford Message-ID: <1136499902.3636.TMDA@sicilia.bradfords.org> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.55 Thus said Charles Cazabon on Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:47:37 CST: > That's a different kettle of fish, and should be solved in a different > manner. If you look in the qmail list archives, you'll see many > discusses of various approaches to distributing a domain across > various sites, each with its own server. qmail-ldap is one way to go; > using named sub-domains with vanilla qmail and some intelligent .qmail > file handling is another, more administration-intensive way to do > this. Another approach (also in the archives) is to use fastfoward and simply distribute /etc/aliases.cdb to each server. This seems less administration-intensive than at least one of these other methods. Andy -- [-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------] 3:25pm up 41 days, 4:52, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.03, 0.01 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 5 23:08:43 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 23292 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 23:09:39 -0000 Received: from wsip-66-210-118-195.ri.ri.cox.net (HELO highstream.kicks-ass.org) (66.210.118.195) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 23:09:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 21435 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 23:08:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO distort.dyndns.org) (64.223.50.209) by highstream.kicks-ass.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 23:08:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:08:43 -0500 (EST) From: brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org Sender: gauze@distort.dyndns.org To: qmail Subject: Re: Single instance storage (SIS) in qmail In-Reply-To: <20060105225953.GA3140@discworld.dyndns.org> Message-ID: References: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> <20060105225953.GA3140@discworld.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Glow Nair wrote: >> Has anyone implemented Single Instance Storage (SIS) in qmail ? (For eg. >> attachments sent to multiple recipients saved once rather than multiple >> times) > > Messages with attachments and more than one recipient will be stored as a > single "instance" for as long as the message is in the queue. > > After delivery, it's no longer up to qmail how the messages are stored. I'm > not sure how you propose to store a message such that two different local > users share an instance when they can each modify it. this was some old thing from Exchange, there is no reason to support it. > > Charles > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Charles Cazabon > Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html > My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > brian -- Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous 18:00:01 up 10:25, 7 users, load average: 0.54, 0.45, 0.27 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 08:16:19 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 89837 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 08:16:56 -0000 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (151.155.5.143) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 08:16:56 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] ifan [85.210.23.223] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 1.6 $ on Linux via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:16:27 -0700 Message-ID: <43BE2753.9010805@solet.co.uk> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:16:19 +0000 From: Ifan Jones User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Disable failure notices References: <4.3.1.1.20060104111601.00b41dd0@hamburg134.server4free.de> <43BD87EE.7060104@solet.co.uk> <20060105214737.GA2454@discworld.dyndns.org> <1136499902.3636.TMDA@sicilia.bradfords.org> In-Reply-To: <1136499902.3636.TMDA@sicilia.bradfords.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps I should expand... There's a international domain that goes to a central mailserv (let's say domain.com) and my server accepts site1-domain.com. I have no control over any of the other sites. Qmail is configured as site1-domain.com Fetchmail does an aka for domain.com and site1-domain.com as they insist that both domains should be deliverable. Problems arise when emails are sent to people in differrent sites domain.com site-domain.com, site2-domain.com etc.... So when one of these arrive at site1-domain.com, intended recipients are delivered successfully, but it also tries to deliver to the other recipients which don't exist..... Andy Bradford wrote: >Thus said Charles Cazabon on Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:47:37 CST: > > > >>That's a different kettle of fish, and should be solved in a different >>manner. If you look in the qmail list archives, you'll see many >>discusses of various approaches to distributing a domain across >>various sites, each with its own server. qmail-ldap is one way to go; >>using named sub-domains with vanilla qmail and some intelligent .qmail >>file handling is another, more administration-intensive way to do >>this. >> >> > >Another approach (also in the archives) is to use fastfoward and >simply distribute /etc/aliases.cdb to each server. This seems less >administration-intensive than at least one of these other methods. > >Andy >-- >[-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------] > 3:25pm up 41 days, 4:52, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.03, 0.01 > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 12:42:33 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 68108 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 12:43:41 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO techno.sub.ru) (86@213.247.139.22) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 12:43:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 11607 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jan 2006 12:43:10 -0000 Received: from mailchecker.sub.ru (HELO localhost) (212.5.120.26) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 12:43:10 -0000 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (mailchecker.sub.ru [212.5.120.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 43485-20; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:42:04 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tarkhil.rostokino.net (HELO ?192.168.1.72?) (tarkhil%sub.ru@85.192.19.9) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 12:43:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43BE65B9.5010501@over.ru> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:42:33 +0300 From: Alex Povolotsky User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Meis CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Spam filtering References: <43BE521D.3030608@simoon.de> In-Reply-To: <43BE521D.3030608@simoon.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sub.ru Alexander Meis wrote: > Hi... > > i use qmail with qmailscanner,spamassassin und clamd for filtering the > mails. Is there a way to let qmailscanner filter out the Spams as it > does with the virus mails? I even want to filter Spam out of our > outgoing mail. Having a bit more than little load (about 300 domains, 10 mails/minute average AFTER most of filtering, about 120 connection attempts per minute raw), I've ended up with self-made graylist patch, denial for hosts without reverse DNS, and amavis+spamassassin filtering after that. I am enjoying less than 10% rejects on SpamAssassin and about 1-2 spams per day on my account (before graylist+RBL+RDNS block, I've got 75% of mail rejected by SpamAssassin and 10+ spams per day on my account AFTER spamssassin reject). Alex. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 11:18:53 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 78261 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 11:17:53 -0000 Received: from endor1.pixelhouse.de (213.131.250.15) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 11:17:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 31370 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 11:17:21 -0000 Received: from 84.175.78.96 by endor1 (envelope-from , uid 601) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1229. spamassassin: 3.1.0. Clear:RC:1(84.175.78.96):. Processed in 0.053086 secs); 06 Jan 2006 11:17:21 -0000 Received: from p54af4e60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (84.175.78.96) by endor1.pixelhouse.de with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 11:17:21 -0000 Message-ID: <43BE521D.3030608@simoon.de> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:18:53 +0100 From: Alexander Meis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Spam filtering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi... i use qmail with qmailscanner,spamassassin und clamd for filtering the mails. Is there a way to let qmailscanner filter out the Spams as it does with the virus mails? I even want to filter Spam out of our outgoing mail. Thanks Alex From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 14:02:51 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 52595 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 14:05:26 -0000 Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (195.159.0.145) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 14:05:26 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.137] (unknown [195.159.170.100]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563F58366 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:02:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43BE788B.5040409@nordhagen.no> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:02:51 +0100 From: Webmaster User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Problems with installing qmail-1.03 on redhat enterprise version 4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hia. I'm trying to install qmail on my redhat server (kernel 2.6.9-22.0.1, 64 bits CPU) However when i "make setup check" it returns with the following: "./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a substdio.a(substdo.o)(.text+0x69): In function `allwrite': : undefined reference to `errno' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [auto-str] Error 1" I understand that this error message might not give too much information and I will therefore provide you with any extra information that you require. Thank you for any pointers or any help that you might give :) From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 14:12:50 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 63845 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 14:13:24 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (64798dc58e8ea6c1b9ff7b1deaf1a1a9ecb92aab@70.64.60.7) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 14:13:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 9187 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2006 14:12:52 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 3a7bab0b97fe752e0d6d662445d5a39fbe5ca99d Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:12:50 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Problems with installing qmail-1.03 on redhat enterprise version 4 Message-ID: <20060106141250.GA8789@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <43BE788B.5040409@nordhagen.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BE788B.5040409@nordhagen.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Webmaster wrote: > > Thank you for any pointers or any help that you might give :) Google for "qmail errno" will give you the right answer. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 14:14:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66273 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 14:15:07 -0000 Received: from asbak.coding-slaves.com (qmailr@82.93.81.131) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 14:15:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 25275 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 14:14:36 -0000 Received: from grolsch.home.lan (HELO ?10.10.10.2?) (10.10.10.2) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 14:14:36 -0000 Message-ID: <43BE7B4C.6070801@asbak.coding-slaves.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:14:36 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Problems with installing qmail-1.03 on redhat enterprise version 4 References: <43BE788B.5040409@nordhagen.no> In-Reply-To: <43BE788B.5040409@nordhagen.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/6/2006 3:02 PM +0200, Webmaster wrote: > Hia. > > I'm trying to install qmail on my redhat server (kernel 2.6.9-22.0.1, 64 > bits CPU) > However when i "make setup check" it returns with the following: > "./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a > substdio.a(substdo.o)(.text+0x69): In function `allwrite': > : undefined reference to `errno' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [auto-str] Error 1" > > I understand that this error message might not give too much information > and I will therefore provide you with any extra information that you > require. > > Thank you for any pointers or any help that you might give :) http://www.google.com/search?q=qmail+errno Also see the excellent guide http://lifewithqmail.org Regards, Niek Baakman From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 17:20:28 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 59888 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 17:20:59 -0000 Received: from mail.microlinkdenver.com (69.25.214.14) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 17:20:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 7539 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 17:21:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 17:21:26 -0000 Message-ID: <43BEA6DC.2050402@t10.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:20:28 -0700 From: Eric User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Spam filtering References: <43BE521D.3030608@simoon.de> In-Reply-To: <43BE521D.3030608@simoon.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alexander Meis wrote: > Hi... > > i use qmail with qmailscanner,spamassassin und clamd for filtering the > mails. Is there a way to let qmailscanner filter out the Spams as it > does with the virus mails? I even want to filter Spam out of our > outgoing mail. > > Thanks > > Alex > Here ya go: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DeletingAllMailsMarkedSpam (this is my first time helping someone and I'm actually nervous hitting the send button because I hope I replied correctly. haha I'm scared of Charles...) From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 6 22:45:26 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 97952 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2006 22:46:15 -0000 Received: from memoryhole.net (207.178.113.208) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 6 Jan 2006 22:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 21392 invoked by uid 64020); 6 Jan 2006 22:45:31 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=WLKu5c1y+E7ErGQjKDtAIFcjatXBlw/cOWNbBe1UeRiCW/nQX6grkCIDKt7xPfdDuaDNcCindOF/OPLyKuLUBHt1uX7DDOwU47EOUZASxBJhnWjG6VEfhle8Qll5wp7hexEvfxusVLabxzxZsp43DnJiShdpiXTd6pdqyE/Ox1o= ; Received: from c-67-177-180-177.hsd1.in.comcast.net (HELO tunican.local) (kyle@67.177.180.177) by memoryhole.net with ESMTPA; 6 Jan 2006 22:45:30 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:45:26 -0500 From: Kyle Wheeler To: qmail Subject: Re: Single instance storage (SIS) in qmail Message-ID: <20060106224526.GF1833@tunican.local> Mail-Followup-To: qmail References: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> <20060105225953.GA3140@discworld.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bAmEntskrkuBymla" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --bAmEntskrkuBymla Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, January 5 at 06:08 PM, quoth brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org: >> Glow Nair wrote: >>> Has anyone implemented Single Instance Storage (SIS) in qmail ? (For e= g. >>> attachments sent to multiple recipients saved once rather than multiple >>> times) >> >> Messages with attachments and more than one recipient will be stored as a >> single "instance" for as long as the message is in the queue. >> >> After delivery, it's no longer up to qmail how the messages are stored. = =20 >> I'm >> not sure how you propose to store a message such that two different local >> users share an instance when they can each modify it. > > this was some old thing from Exchange, there is no reason to support it. For what it's worth (and that's not much, if you ask me), MSFT developed=20 a single-instance-store filesystem based on file hashes. If you're=20 sufficiently concerned about all the extra space taken up by multiple=20 recipients of the same email (which is really silly, especially from a=20 quota perspective), you may want to look into that as a mailstore=20 backend. Let's turn it around: what problem are you trying to solve? ~Kyle --=20 If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you=20 really make them think, they'll hate you. -- Don Marquis --bAmEntskrkuBymla Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQFDvvMGBkIOoMqOI14RAmtOAJoD28IDdAS7/nsFZlkiZYkUlve2EACcDLIC uC2+kT+Yo1iCi123nThQmbg= =NRi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bAmEntskrkuBymla-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 00:53:55 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 32827 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 00:54:41 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO smtp.zedemail.net) (204.209.44.218) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 00:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 8700 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 00:54:01 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) (204.209.44.218) by smtp.zedemail.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 00:54:01 -0000 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 From: Blair Lowe To: Nikola Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:53:55 -0700 Message-Id: <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cool! I tried it out and it seems OK on CentOS. I also created three spec files: dietlibc.spec, libowfat.spec, and qmail-sms.spec for us CentOS dudes (and possibly other Linux rpm OS's) at the usual location: http://www.computerengineering.ca/download/specs/ My question is: I use vmailmgr, and have virtual users. The .qmail technique does not seem to work for an individual user eg. /home//users//.qmail My .qmail file is as per your docs, and the forwarding works from the command line but why not in the users' directory. TTYL, Blair. On Tue, 2005-20-12 at 21:24 +0200, Nikola wrote: > Hi People! > > I wrote a simple client for qmail to forward email to SMS. > My uses qmail-queue. Simply add in dot-mail one line: > > |qmail-sms 160 5 user-smsblock@host.com 123456789@sms.host.net > > The above arguments means: > $ ./qmail-sms > usage: qmail-sms maxsize maxparts sender recipient [-n] > > http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/qmail-sms-0.1.tar.gz > > Enjoy, Nikola From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 04:00:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 18244 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 04:00:50 -0000 Received: from ipx10069.ipxserver.de (HELO codeblau.de) (80.190.240.67) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 04:00:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16135 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jan 2006 04:00:20 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 05:00:20 +0100 From: Felix von Leitner To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Single instance storage (SIS) in qmail Message-ID: <20060107040020.GA15628@codeblau.de> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060103184858.71601.qmail@web52403.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Thus spake Glow Nair (zanchu_glow@yahoo.com): > Has anyone implemented Single Instance Storage > (SIS) in qmail ? I once implemented hard linked maildir storage for a customer. This only works for scenarios with virtual mailboxes, where all mailboxes belong to the same uid and only known pop and imap servers access the maildirs, not shell users with vi. Disks are cheap, though. And you lose the Delivered-To line stating the local mailbox name. The delivery program also includes LDAP code, so it's not very useful on it's own. The multi-link feature requires postfix or a patched qmail, though, only has a whole-email granularity (does not catch the case where some external guy sends you the same email three times, unless the email comes in as one email with multiple recipients over smtp). It helps performance a lot if you have a lot if pressure due to internal mass mailings with large Word attachments, because less data is actually written to disk. Felix From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 09:31:55 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 41879 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 09:29:45 -0000 Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (212.27.42.27) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 09:29:45 -0000 Received: from [192.168.5.2] (gad13-1-82-233-132-100.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.132.100]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5702DF45; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 10:29:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43BF8A8B.2080306@linuxpourtous.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0100 From: Franck User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wilfred Lang'at CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail install script 1.3.17 References: <43A532FE.5060005@linuxpourtous.com> <43BF6D18.50309@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43BF6D18.50309@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, > Frank, > > It is in French. Do you have an English page? Sorry, no english webpage but the script (*.tar.gz) is in english Franck > Regards > Wilfred > > Franck wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i've released a new version of my qmail installation script 1.3.17 : >> http://www.linuxpourtous.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=4 >> >> >> CHANGELOG >> >> * Versions of softwares sources updated >> * Minor changes in supervise scripts for chkuser >> * Minor changes in simscan installation >> * Added values.suse10.0 file >> * Minor debug in ezmlm installation >> * Added values.sles9 for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9. Thanks to >> Nikilauda >> * Succesfully tested on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9. Thanks to >> Nikilauda >> >> You could post feedbacks in forum. >> >> Regards >> >> Franck >> >> From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 16:01:53 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 20326 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 16:02:27 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f014b14a.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (be2eacd6bfe5cfc31ba84e6014443d7f4bf33a26@70.64.60.7) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 16:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 19117 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2006 16:01:55 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 93620a2210b05247f75c42af827c95893dcc42cb Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 10:01:53 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 Message-ID: <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Blair Lowe wrote: > Cool! Your message was top-posted. Please configure your MUA to quote correctly before sending messages to mailing lists. If you don't know what this means, read this: http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/T/top-post.html To learn what "quote correctly" means, read this: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html If you are using an MS MUA, these free add-on packages can apparently fix their quoting style for you: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ > > I wrote a simple client for qmail to forward email to SMS. > > My uses qmail-queue. Simply add in dot-mail one line: > > > > |qmail-sms 160 5 user-smsblock@host.com 123456789@sms.host.net > > I tried it out and it seems OK on CentOS. [...] > My question is: I use vmailmgr, and have virtual users. The .qmail > technique does not seem to work for an individual user eg. /home/ name virtual user>/users//.qmail It does work. You just put the .qmail file in the wrong place -- you appear to have done it the way the vpopmail MDA expects things, whereas vmailmgr lets you use the native qmail way of doing it. Create the file /.qmail- instead and it will work fine. If you have further questions about this, the vmailmgr list is probably more appropriate. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 20:36:04 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 90474 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 20:36:34 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 20:36:34 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A176467EBA for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:36:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:36:04 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Slow queues Message-ID: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I have queues piling up. messages in queue: 53279 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 Current smtpd sessions: 241 Mail currently being delivered remotely: 1 Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 Current POP mail: 1 This is on one server. smtpd sessions are set for 250. Clamd, qscanner, rblsmtpd being used. A lot is garbage, but there is much valid mail there too. Some that is over 24 hrs old waiting to be delivered. There are qmail-getpw processes hung it looks like too. We inherited three qmail systems and we run postfix and sendmail for so long now I really dont know squat about qmail. What can be done to speed up queue processing? Thanks, Keith. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 7 20:57:02 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 15846 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 20:57:49 -0000 Received: from memoryhole.net (207.178.113.208) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 20:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 12872 invoked by uid 64020); 7 Jan 2006 20:57:04 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=d08jImcl9JA1zq1ZFTz/G0ONvma6tFvSyMfWO6n8lsTh1NjKXzuYBLLLXbdCqi/QM9MLuk4POa+ufi1cEypxo6Fm+SODFkekIrQpe7LbsVu/JzxXfklXC5B7Azdy1KlrrWbLa7674k/j5dcbxuAtDSvcXRTLLEewpnI9vuyakiw= ; Received: from c-67-177-180-177.hsd1.in.comcast.net (HELO tunican.local) (kyle@67.177.180.177) by memoryhole.net with ESMTPA; 7 Jan 2006 20:57:03 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:57:02 -0500 From: Kyle Wheeler To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Slow queues Message-ID: <20060107205702.GQ1833@tunican.local> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="07FIeBX8hApXX6Bi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --07FIeBX8hApXX6Bi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, January 7 at 12:36 PM, quoth Keith Woodworth: > >I have queues piling up. > >messages in queue: 53279 >messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 > >Current smtpd sessions: 241 >Mail currently being delivered remotely: 1 >Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 >Current POP mail: 1 Looks more or less "normal." It could be, with that many messages in=20 your queue, that you're being used by a spammer, and thus those messages=20 in the queue are the spams that couldn't get sent. Check your logs to find out why they aren't being delivered. >This is on one server. smtpd sessions are set for 250. Clamd, qscanner, >rblsmtpd being used. > >A lot is garbage, but there is much valid mail there too. Some that is >over 24 hrs old waiting to be delivered. I'm pretty sure your valid mail got several delivery attempts in the=20 last 24 hours. Check your logs and find out why they didn't get=20 delivered. >There are qmail-getpw processes hung it looks like too. What are you using qmail-getpw for? If those processes are hung, then getpwnam() isn't working properly, and=20 your OS is likely majorly hosed. >We inherited three qmail systems and we run postfix and sendmail >for so long now I really dont know squat about qmail. > >What can be done to speed up queue processing? Lots of things. Step one is to find out whether there's a slowdown, and=20 what that slowdown might be. Specifically, look in your logs to see why=20 these messages are not being delivered. ~Kyle --=20 To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we=20 are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic=20 and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. -- Theodore Roosevelt, 1912 --07FIeBX8hApXX6Bi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQFDwCseBkIOoMqOI14RAgV8AKC0BUXCMQxdxfOj48NlY9JZSu+3WgCg2UzA ty23OQb2JFAabCtoH6L1eIs= =6AqZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --07FIeBX8hApXX6Bi-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 8 05:29:52 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 3909 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 05:21:52 -0000 Received: from web22.dimakhconsultants.com (HELO dc2.dimakhconsultants.com) (67.15.88.12) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 05:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8742 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 06:42:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.5.142) by ev1s-67-15-88-140.ev1servers.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 06:42:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7246 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2006 05:29:52 -0000 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:59:52 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu " To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Slow queues Message-ID: <20060108052952.GA7242@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: "K. Shantanu " , qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * Keith Woodworth [060108 09:31]: > > I have queues piling up. > > messages in queue: 53279 > messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 Might be that most of the mails are to a specific server (might be they are twarting a possible spam attack from your server). Seeing the queue might help to find out the problem. Also, check if they are local mails or remote mails. If they are local mails maybe there is a problem with your .qmail file(s). And last but not least check the logs of qmail-send. If you have good bandwidth then increase concurrency remote and try to push them out by giving and ALRM signal to qmail. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 8 19:20:59 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 96282 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 19:31:24 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 19:31:24 -0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvgFZ-0006kY-Jd for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:30:45 +0100 Received: from ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([70.228.56.50]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:30:45 +0100 Received: from michael.avila.1 by ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:30:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: "MikeA" Subject: Problems Compiling Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:20:59 -0500 Lines: 22 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Sender: news I am new to Linux, gcc, qmail, and everything in the Linux world. PLEASE have patience with me as I stumble along! Thank you. I am using a CentOS 4.2 Linux system. I am trying to install qmail. It is my understanding that daemontools (I downloaded daemontools-0.76.tar.gz) and ucspi-tcp (I downloaded ucspi-tcp.0.88.tar.gz) are required. I downloaded the lasest version of gcc. I followed the directions on the download pages. When compiling I received errors but the errors flew by so fast I could not see them all. Most were undefined references. 1) Is there a "log" file that will tell me the errors so I can post them here and get help? 2) How can I resolve undefined references? Possibly others have been through this and know what it is about already. This is an unchanged CentOS 4.2 setup with qmail, gnome, and the above items added. Perhaps a PATH entry is missing or something like that. Thank you in advance for your patience and help. Mike From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 8 22:21:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 64172 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 22:22:07 -0000 Received: from wsip-66-210-118-195.ri.ri.cox.net (HELO highstream.kicks-ass.org) (66.210.118.195) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 22:22:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 7698 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 22:21:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO distort.dyndns.org) (64.223.50.209) by highstream.kicks-ass.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 22:21:11 -0000 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:21:10 -0500 (EST) From: brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org Sender: gauze@distort.dyndns.org To: qmail Subject: Re: Problems Compiling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, MikeA wrote: > I am new to Linux, gcc, qmail, and everything in the Linux world. PLEASE have patience with me as I > stumble along! Thank you. > > I am using a CentOS 4.2 Linux system. I am trying to install qmail. It is my understanding that > daemontools (I downloaded daemontools-0.76.tar.gz) and ucspi-tcp (I downloaded > ucspi-tcp.0.88.tar.gz) are required. I downloaded the lasest version of gcc. I followed the > directions on the download pages. When compiling I received errors but the errors flew by so fast I > could not see them all. Most were undefined references. without seeing them they are almost definitely the #1 most asked question on this list ever. check www.qmail.org it contains much information on qmail, as an install guide many of us use www.lifewithqmail.org . don't be cute and try to set up a virtual user based system with smtp auth before before you can set up a basic Unix account based install that works. Walk before you can run. Good luck, although luck has nothing to do with it. > > 1) Is there a "log" file that will tell me the errors so I can post them here and get help? > > 2) How can I resolve undefined references? Possibly others have been through this and know what it > is about already. > > This is an unchanged CentOS 4.2 setup with qmail, gnome, and the above items added. Perhaps a PATH > entry is missing or something like that. > > Thank you in advance for your patience and help. > > Mike > > > > brian -- Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous 17:15:01 up 3 days, 9:41, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.01 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 8 23:27:07 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 30015 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 23:27:36 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 23:27:36 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvjwB-0007D6-Fb for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:27:00 +0100 Received: from ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([70.228.56.50]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:26:59 +0100 Received: from michael.avila.1 by ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:26:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: "MikeA" Subject: Re: Problems Compiling Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:27:07 -0500 Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Sender: news I have the lwq.pdf and am following it. There is nothing in on what to do with errors. As a matter of a fact, it has the same information as on the daemontools page. And I am not being "cute" as you call it. I'm trying to learn to do things. You did not answer a single question that I asked. You just were arrogant. If you cannot be helpful please do not respond. People like you twice before made me drop Linux and head back to Windows where my life is a lot easier. I would have had a mail server up by now. wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.62.0601081715550.28104@distort.dyndns.org... On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, MikeA wrote: > I am new to Linux, gcc, qmail, and everything in the Linux world. PLEASE have patience with me as > I > stumble along! Thank you. > > I am using a CentOS 4.2 Linux system. I am trying to install qmail. It is my understanding that > daemontools (I downloaded daemontools-0.76.tar.gz) and ucspi-tcp (I downloaded > ucspi-tcp.0.88.tar.gz) are required. I downloaded the lasest version of gcc. I followed the > directions on the download pages. When compiling I received errors but the errors flew by so fast > I > could not see them all. Most were undefined references. without seeing them they are almost definitely the #1 most asked question on this list ever. check www.qmail.org it contains much information on qmail, as an install guide many of us use www.lifewithqmail.org . don't be cute and try to set up a virtual user based system with smtp auth before before you can set up a basic Unix account based install that works. Walk before you can run. Good luck, although luck has nothing to do with it. > > 1) Is there a "log" file that will tell me the errors so I can post them here and get help? > > 2) How can I resolve undefined references? Possibly others have been through this and know what it > is about already. > > This is an unchanged CentOS 4.2 setup with qmail, gnome, and the above items added. Perhaps a PATH > entry is missing or something like that. > > Thank you in advance for your patience and help. > > Mike > > > > brian -- Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous 17:15:01 up 3 days, 9:41, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.01 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 01:10:44 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 33858 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 01:11:41 -0000 Received: from bne001se.server-mail.com (203.147.241.112) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 01:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 1191 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 01:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.21.22) (192.168.21.22) by bne001se.server-mail.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 01:10:44 -0000 Subject: Re: Problems Compiling From: Richard Lyons To: qmail list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:10:44 +1000 Message-Id: <1136769044.31381.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 18:27 -0500, MikeA wrote: > I have the lwq.pdf and am following it. There is nothing in on what to do with errors. As a matter > of a fact, it has the same information as on the daemontools page. $ make 2>err The "2>err" will save the error messages in the file "err". > And I am not being "cute" as you call it. I'm trying to learn to do things. You did not answer a > single question that I asked. You just were arrogant. > > If you cannot be helpful please do not respond. People like you twice before made me drop Linux and > head back to Windows where my life is a lot easier. I would have had a mail server up by now. Not trying to be arrogant, but if you want to continue down the non-MS road you'd best thicken up your skin. The sort of folk who hang out in this neck of the woods require those that request help have some idea of how to drive a *nix system. This means understanding basic concepts like shell redirection. Brian was just suggesting that you get a basic install operating correctly before trying to tackle more advanced features, as this can mean patching and recompiling, and is probably out of your reach at your current level of understanding. If you think Brian is on your case, you are not equipped to handle the more acerbic list members. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 01:48:50 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 70783 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 01:49:15 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 01:49:15 -0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Evm9E-0004Hy-IS for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:48:36 +0100 Received: from ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([70.228.56.50]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:48:36 +0100 Received: from michael.avila.1 by ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:48:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: "MikeA" Subject: Re: Problems Compiling Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:48:50 -0500 Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <1136769044.31381.16.camel@localhost> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-70-228-56-50.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Sender: news Perhaps. But he could have answered the questions like you did. You answered the question, helped me help myself, and then advised me what to learn. And you did it without snide remarks. That sure makes wanting to learn Linux more desirable. If that is how people are treated it is no wonder Linux is not quickly heading to be the standard desktop. Like you did, help people to understand and Linux will win more and more converts quicker. We all have to learn somewhere and we all learn differently. And sometimes we have to learn the hard way due to a deadline. In any case, I do know redirection but did not think of that. I can get the file and then post it here to see what is missing if I cannot figure it out myself.. The Linux system itself is up and running but there is not much else that I can do. I am working on getting Gnome installed. I am trying to get qmail installed as this will be a mail server and nothing else. I have Apache installed under Windows for now but might switch that to Linux or Solaris later. I use ssh to get back and forth on both systems. Thank you for taking the time to help me and for your patience with a newbie! Mike "Richard Lyons" wrote in message news:1136769044.31381.16.camel@localhost... On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 18:27 -0500, MikeA wrote: > I have the lwq.pdf and am following it. There is nothing in on what to do with errors. As a matter > of a fact, it has the same information as on the daemontools page. $ make 2>err The "2>err" will save the error messages in the file "err". > And I am not being "cute" as you call it. I'm trying to learn to do things. You did not answer a > single question that I asked. You just were arrogant. > > If you cannot be helpful please do not respond. People like you twice before made me drop Linux > and > head back to Windows where my life is a lot easier. I would have had a mail server up by now. Not trying to be arrogant, but if you want to continue down the non-MS road you'd best thicken up your skin. The sort of folk who hang out in this neck of the woods require those that request help have some idea of how to drive a *nix system. This means understanding basic concepts like shell redirection. Brian was just suggesting that you get a basic install operating correctly before trying to tackle more advanced features, as this can mean patching and recompiling, and is probably out of your reach at your current level of understanding. If you think Brian is on your case, you are not equipped to handle the more acerbic list members. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 01:35:49 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 58954 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 01:36:48 -0000 Received: from 12-217-37-1.client.mchsi.com (HELO mail.monsterfro.com) (12.217.37.1) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 01:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 29155 invoked by uid 510); 8 Jan 2006 19:35:52 -0600 Received: from 12.219.219.8 by ns2 (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.85.1/1234. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(12.219.219.8):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.553259 secs); 09 Jan 2006 01:35:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bmagic@cccwireless.net via ns2 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(12.219.219.8):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.553259 secs Process 29146) Received: from 12-219-219-8.client.mchsi.com (HELO ?10.0.0.4?) (bmagic@monsterfro.com@12.219.219.8) by mail.monsterfro.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 19:35:51 -0600 Message-ID: <43C1BDF5.7060105@cccwireless.net> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:35:49 -0600 From: Blake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Need To get Removed From List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have sent a removal notice to the email address but it didn't remove me. Does anyone watch this list who can do it manually? I need bmagic@cccwireless.net removed from the list. Thanks -Blake- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 02:32:45 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 19027 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 02:33:42 -0000 Received: from bne004se.server-mail.com (203.147.241.115) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 02:33:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 1998 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 02:32:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.21.22) (192.168.21.22) by bne004se.server-mail.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 02:32:45 -0000 Subject: Re: Need To get Removed From List From: Richard Lyons To: qmail list In-Reply-To: <43C1BDF5.7060105@cccwireless.net> References: <43C1BDF5.7060105@cccwireless.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:32:45 +1000 Message-Id: <1136773965.31381.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:35 -0600, Blake wrote: > I have sent a removal notice to the email address but it didn't remove me. The list management software should have sent back a confirmation; you need to reply to the confirmation request to finalize the removal. If you didn't receive the confirmation, try looking in your spam folder or check your logs. > Does anyone watch this list who can do it manually? Try qmail-owner@list.cr.yp.to. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 03:52:29 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 1568 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 03:54:56 -0000 Received: from mail.vanmorel.com (64.122.34.190) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 03:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 6806 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 03:54:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.0.28) by mail.vanmorel.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 03:54:26 -0000 Message-ID: <43C1DDFD.9080400@rickvanvliet.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:52:29 -0600 From: Rick van Vliet User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Problems Compiling References: <1136769044.31381.16.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MikeA wrote: > Perhaps. But he could have answered the questions like you did. You answered the question, helped me > help myself, and then advised me what to learn. And you did it without snide remarks. That sure > makes wanting to learn Linux more desirable. If that is how people are treated it is no wonder Linux > > Not trying to be arrogant, but if you want to continue down > the non-MS road you'd best thicken up your skin. The sort Please do not top post. Please do read the 12-steps linked below. They will help smooth your path to enlightenment. http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html And sorry if this seems arrogant, but this specialized qmail list is not the list to expect learning Linux to be made more desireable. That just won't be found here. Looking for archives of this list? http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/ or http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000/ From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 4 09:41:41 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 72092 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2006 09:43:02 -0000 Received: from ns.alcatel.sk (HELO ns.nsd-alcatel.sk) (195.146.155.55) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 09:43:02 -0000 Received: from mail.alcatel.sk ([195.146.155.70]) by ns.nsd-alcatel.sk via smtpd (for stoneport.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.160]) with SMTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:42:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 12901 invoked by uid 507); 4 Jan 2006 09:46:15 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 12894, pid: 12899, t: 0.0034s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO xeon.alcatel.sk) (149.204.1.15) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 09:46:15 -0000 Received: from xeon.alcatel.sk by xeon.alcatel.sk via smtpd (for mail.alcatel.sk [195.146.155.70]) with ESMTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:41:59 +0100 Received: (qmail 21952 invoked by uid 508); 4 Jan 2006 09:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sllh3s.lhr.sel.alcatel.de) (149.204.1.113) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2006 09:42:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:41:41 +0100 From: Miki X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.64.01 Christmas Edition) Professional Reply-To: miki X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <899097544.20060104104141@alcatel.sk> To: Keith Woodworth CC: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: Mail queue problems. In-Reply-To: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> References: <20060103103254.L75276@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Keith, I have lot of <> in queue. Im using script from this link: http://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/ ---------- #!/bin/sh for n in `find /var/qmail/queue/info -size 2c | sed 's/.*\///'` do echo Bonking message $n touch -t 199801010000 /var/qmail/queue/*/*/$n done echo Kicking the queue #qmail-tcpok #killall -ALRM qmail-send qmailctl doqueue ---------------------------------------- this script will change timestamp of bounced <> messages, and after that in next run, qmail will try deliver it once more, if not sucesfull, it will delete them. hope it help Miki Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 7:46:14 PM, you wrote: KW> We have recently taken over an ISP that uses Qmail. My experience has only KW> been with Postfix and Sendmail and am trying to put together how Qmail KW> works. KW> In the last week there have been some issues regarding mail delivery, both KW> locally and remotely. KW> There are three servers, all of the handling incoming and outbound mail. KW> One server mailq: KW> messages in queue: 2700 KW> messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 7 KW> Current smtpd sessions: 54 KW> Mail currently being delivered remotely: 23 KW> Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 KW> Current POP mail: 0 KW> Server #2: KW> messages in queue: 1404 KW> messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 6 KW> Current smtpd sessions: 47 KW> Mail currently being delivered remotely: 18 KW> Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 KW> Current POP mail: 1 KW> Server #3: KW> messages in queue: 1516 KW> messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 KW> Current smtpd sessions: 57 KW> Mail currently being delivered remotely: 10 KW> Mail currently being delivered locally: 0 KW> Current POP mail: 2 KW> Last week the queues on two of the machines were sitting at over 100k KW> mails in both the preprocessed queue and the queue. Stopping and starting KW> qmail on each of the servers has cleaned them out to a degree but mail KW> delivery locally and remotely is still and issue. KW> Most, if not all of the mails were <> null senders. KW> I need to clean out the queue's. With postfix I built some scripts to KW> clean out the queues, but with Qmail Ive read that its bad to delete mail KW> from the queue and it should be expired out instead. There is valid mail KW> in the queues but it takes forever to deliver. KW> SA and Clam are being used on these machines as well rblsmtpd is used too. KW> Where can I start looking at this to figure out why Qmail is so slow at KW> processing mail? KW> The log file sucks as *everything* is logged to one big file by something KW> called Overlord. Syslog is one line: KW> *.* /usr/sbin/overlord KW> Makes it hard to figure what program is doing what. KW> Anyone have some clue to share on where to start? KW> Thanks, KW> Keith -- Best regards, Miki mailto:adminmiki@alcatel.sk From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 11:38:28 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66581 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 11:39:00 -0000 Received: from asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (195.188.213.60) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 11:39:00 -0000 Received: from [82.38.184.30] (helo=router.base) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EvvM6-0000K6-DS for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:38:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 1288 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2006 11:38:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO andrew.office) (10.20.80.77) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 11:38:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 5952 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2006 11:38:28 -0000 From: Andrew Richards To: qmail Subject: Re: Problems Compiling Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:38:28 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601091138.28727.ar-djblists@nwdb.co.uk> On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:21, brian@highstream.kicks-ass.org wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, MikeA wrote: > > I am new to Linux, gcc, qmail, and everything in the Linux world. > > PLEASE have patience with me as I stumble along! Thank you. > > > > I am using a CentOS 4.2 Linux system. I am trying to install > > qmail. It is my understanding that daemontools (I downloaded > > daemontools-0.76.tar.gz) and ucspi-tcp (I downloaded > > ucspi-tcp.0.88.tar.gz) are required. I downloaded the lasest > > version of gcc. I followed the directions on the download pages. > > When compiling I received errors but the errors flew by so fast I > > could not see them all. Most were undefined references. > > without seeing them they are almost definitely the #1 most asked > question on this list ever. >... Just search for "errno" on the qmail home page, www.qmail.org. That'll probably get you sorted. If not, send the list the errors you're seeing. cheers, Andrew. -- ====================================================================== Network Design & Build http://www.nwdb.co.uk/ * Custom email solutions * Systems Administration * Networking ====================================================================== From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 13:31:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 81267 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 13:29:54 -0000 Received: from po.spectrum.net.in (202.146.192.146) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 13:29:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22250 invoked by uid 513); 9 Jan 2006 18:38:03 +0530 Received: from 202.146.192.143 by po.spectrum.net.in (envelope-from , uid 503) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1234. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.223944 secs); 09 Jan 2006 13:08:03 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in via po.spectrum.net.in X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25st (Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.223944 secs Process 22232) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.70?) (202.146.192.143) by po.spectrum.net.in with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 18:38:02 +0530 Message-ID: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:01:14 +0530 From: anu bhaskar Reply-To: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in Organization: spectrum softtech solutions User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (X11/20050908) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail Subject: sending multiple mails Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations using same email address at same time. thank you -- anu bhaskar linux administrator From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 13:55:19 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 11759 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 13:56:14 -0000 Received: from smtp.dols.net.pk (202.147.176.47) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 13:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 12956 invoked by uid 508); 9 Jan 2006 18:55:15 +0500 Received: from 202.147.176.41 by smtp (envelope-from , uid 502) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1141. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(202.147.176.41):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.085532 secs); 09 Jan 2006 13:55:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-DOLS-Mail-From: zaeem.arshad@dols.net.pk via smtp X-Antivirus-DOLS: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(202.147.176.41):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.085532 secs Process 12942) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dols.net.pk) (202.147.176.41) by smtp.dols.net.pk with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 18:55:15 +0500 Received: (qmail 29606 invoked by uid 510); 9 Jan 2006 18:55:16 +0500 Received: from zaeem.arshad@dols.net.pk by mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 ( Clear:RC:0(202.147.163.253):. Processed in 0.297015 secs); 09 Jan 2006 13:55:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host163-253-dsl-dancomonline.net.pk) (zaeem.arshad@dols.net.pk@202.147.163.253) by mail.dols.net.pk with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 18:55:15 +0500 Subject: Re: sending multiple mails From: Zaeem Arshad Reply-To: zaeem.arshad@dols.net.pk To: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in Cc: qmail In-Reply-To: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> References: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Dancom Online Services Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:55:19 +0500 Message-Id: <1136814919.26006.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 19:01 +0530, anu bhaskar wrote: > hi > what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations using > same email address at same time. > It will deliver them i guess?? > thank you > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 15:33:01 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 22525 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 15:24:55 -0000 Received: from dc5.dimakhconsultants.com (64.34.193.249) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 15:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20287 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 09:24:26 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.3.221) by dc5.dimakhconsultants.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 09:24:25 -0600 Received: (qmail 3704 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2006 15:33:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:03:01 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu " To: qmail Subject: Re: sending multiple mails Message-ID: <20060109153301.GA3694@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: qmail References: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * anu bhaskar [060109 21:00]: > hi > what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations using > same email address at same time. huh!!! is this a trick question? > anu bhaskar > linux administrator I guess it is. I give up. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 17:51:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 32820 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 17:51:48 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 17:51:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 21707 invoked by uid 227); 9 Jan 2006 17:51:19 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.026062 secs); 09 Jan 2006 17:51:19 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 09 Jan 2006 17:51:19 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Need To get Removed From List Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:51:14 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43C1BDF5.7060105@cccwireless.net> In-Reply-To: <43C1BDF5.7060105@cccwireless.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8021281.vHUsHtA591"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601090951.19003.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart8021281.vHUsHtA591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 08 January 2006 17:35, you wrote: > I have sent a removal notice to the email address but it didn't remove me. you are probably using the wrong address. Look in the headers of messages= =20 sent to you from the list for something like this: Return-Path:=20 that shows that my subscription address is kitchen-qmail@scriptkitchen.com,= =20 and that's what I need to unsubscribe as. > I need bmagic@cccwireless.net removed from the list. are you sure? =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart8021281.vHUsHtA591 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDwqKWyBTJv0gb9+IRAkM4AJwJdyxUSH6PCAdaQWPUIC4nltUFZACfYeTy 4EU0X9BlCPBnCz+qdpipW9k= =SD0+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8021281.vHUsHtA591-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 9 20:59:48 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6176 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 21:00:18 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 21:00:18 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D3A67F01 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:59:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:59:48 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Mail queue Message-ID: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Ive been watching the qmail log on these servers and I began to see a bit of a pattern after a while. These are not piped through tai64nlocal but it seems a process of qmail delivery stops. When local (or rather all delivery to local and remote stops) this is what I see in the log: @4000000043c2a7eb34f0b624 info msg 1500681: bytes 2494 from qp 62294 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ec0f2478f4 new msg 1500685 @4000000043c2a7ec0fd2f104 info msg 1500685: bytes 8456 from <> qp 62305 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ec1f9e5664 new msg 1500689 @4000000043c2a7ec2018b684 info msg 1500689: bytes 9725 from qp 62322 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ec38a1277c new msg 1500688 @4000000043c2a7ec38a35de4 info msg 1500688: bytes 18811 from qp 62311 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ed0915300c new msg 1500692 @4000000043c2a7ed0943c5d4 info msg 1500692: bytes 14942 from qp 62347 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ed1bc6409c new msg 1500683 @4000000043c2a7ed1bd7a1d4 info msg 1500683: bytes 4066 from qp 62340 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ed2c9ae06c new msg 1500686 @4000000043c2a7ed2c9e66c4 info msg 1500686: bytes 4041 from <> qp 62342 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ee01bee44c new msg 1500682 @4000000043c2a7ee01c17c5c info msg 1500682: bytes 9720 from qp 62356 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ee18f86ee4 new msg 1500687 @4000000043c2a7ee191d0de4 info msg 1500687: bytes 7759 from qp 62364 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ee2f75b244 new msg 1500691 @4000000043c2a7ee2f78e694 info msg 1500691: bytes 4418 from qp 62385 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ef01027dd4 new msg 1500690 @4000000043c2a7ef01144c6c info msg 1500690: bytes 4422 from qp 62382 uid 0 @4000000043c2a7ef0ee15574 new msg 1500695 @4000000043c2a7ef0ee3d614 info msg 1500695: bytes 4278 from <> qp 62389 uid 0 New msg, info, new, info etc...no delivery messages at all. No errors, nothing. Delivery just stops. But Qmail keeps happily accepting new mail into the queue. I watched this particular log for 15 mins and I did not see one attempt at delivery. After stopping qmail and restarting qmail mail begins to be delivered again. 2006-01-09 13:28:45.700034500 delivery 241: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2006-01-09 13:28:45.775256500 status: local 2/10 remote 8/120 2006-01-09 13:28:45.811639500 starting delivery 243: msg 1489126 to local haplite@monarch.net 2006-01-09 13:28:45.811917500 status: local 3/10 remote 8/120 2006-01-09 13:28:45.816029500 starting delivery 244: msg 1489102 to remote rentit2@mts.net 2006-01-09 13:28:45.820763500 status: local 3/10 remote 9/120 2006-01-09 13:28:45.835031500 end msg 1488920 2006-01-09 13:28:46.420531500 bounce msg 1489125 qp 53473 2006-01-09 13:28:46.463107500 end msg 1489125 2006-01-09 13:28:46.566438500 delivery 243: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2006-01-09 13:28:46.627668500 status: local 2/10 remote 9/120 2006-01-09 13:28:46.629587500 delivery 233: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2006-01-09 13:28:46.716805500 status: local 1/10 remote 9/120 2006-01-09 13:28:46.717571500 delivery 237: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2006-01-09 13:28:46.839307500 status: local 0/10 remote 9/120 2006-01-09 13:28:46.860594500 new msg 1488421 2006-01-09 13:28:46.861975500 info msg 1488421: bytes 15457 from <> qp 53315 uid 1007 2006-01-09 13:28:47.050154500 starting delivery 245: msg 1489127 to local gagarin@monarch.net which tells me something with qmail suddenly just stop delivering mail. Deliveries for some reason just stop but qmail keeps right on accepting the mail. This happens on all 3 servers, more frequently on two of them. I wondering if qmail-scanner is having some problems here. From what I understand qmail-scanner takes mail from the queue and puts a mail through whatever its been setup to do then if it passes gets delivered. Anyone lend a clue here? Thanks, Keith From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 01:17:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 71271 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 01:17:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO a.mx.jms1.net) (209.114.200.128) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 01:17:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20463 invoked by uid 172); 9 Jan 2006 20:17:26 -0500 Received: from 65.33.160.197 by zippy.jms1.net (envelope-from , uid 162) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1235. Clear:RC:0(65.33.160.197):. Processed in 0.211852 secs); 10 Jan 2006 01:17:26 -0000 Received: from 197.160.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.69.23?) (jms1@jms1.net@65.33.160.197) by a.mx.jms1.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 20:17:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> References: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-20--365149265" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Simpson Subject: Re: Mail queue Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:17:20 -0500 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-20--365149265 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 2006-01-09, at 1559, Keith Woodworth wrote: > > I wondering if qmail-scanner is having some problems here. From what I > understand qmail-scanner takes mail from the queue and puts a mail > through > whatever its been setup to do then if it passes gets delivered. actually, qmail-scanner sits between qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. it's designed to "do its thing" before messages get added to the queue. once a message finds its way into the queue, qmail-scanner has nothing further to do with the process. -------------------------------------------------- | John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/ | -------------------------------------------------- | Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX | | pretty than it is to make Windows secure. | -------------------------------------------------- --Apple-Mail-20--365149265 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDwwskEB9RczMG/PsRAt93AJ9WbTfyyh9xCS5Ex5l/0g7crwEIVACg9ds1 B3lrGtujQdoiUkadjlB+wqg= =uWdd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-20--365149265-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 02:01:02 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 31413 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 01:59:40 -0000 Received: from po.spectrum.net.in (202.146.192.146) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 01:59:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 3023 invoked by uid 513); 10 Jan 2006 07:07:49 +0530 Received: from 202.146.192.143 by po.spectrum.net.in (envelope-from , uid 503) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1235. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.101728 secs); 10 Jan 2006 01:37:49 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in via po.spectrum.net.in X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25st (Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.101728 secs Process 3015) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.70?) (202.146.192.143) by po.spectrum.net.in with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 07:07:48 +0530 Message-ID: <43C3155E.7060102@spectrum.net.in> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:31:02 +0530 From: anu bhaskar Reply-To: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in Organization: spectrum softtech solutions User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (X11/20050908) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail Subject: Re: sending multiple mails References: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> <20060109153301.GA3694@localhost.localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060109153301.GA3694@localhost.localhost> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010500040200040503010408" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010500040200040503010408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit K. Shantanu wrote: > * anu bhaskar [060109 21:00]: > >> hi >> what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations using >> same email address at same time. >> > > huh!!! is this a trick question? > this is not a trick. i have a client who tries to use same address in two different branches. but randomly these two branches where not able to send mails. they get connection timed out. i checked all the firewall rules and mail client settings. no problems in them. -- anu bhaskar --------------010500040200040503010408 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit K. Shantanu wrote: 
* anu bhaskar <anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in> [060109 21:00]:
  
hi
what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations using 
same email address at same time.
    

huh!!! is this a trick question?
this is not a trick. i have a client who tries to use same address in two different branches. but randomly these two branches where not able to send mails. they get connection timed out. i checked all the firewall rules and mail client settings. no problems in them.

-- 
anu bhaskar
--------------010500040200040503010408-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 02:17:19 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 60494 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 02:17:48 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 02:17:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2690 invoked by uid 227); 10 Jan 2006 02:17:20 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.029565 secs); 10 Jan 2006 02:17:20 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 10 Jan 2006 02:17:20 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail queue Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:17:19 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> In-Reply-To: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1625725.a2yBLqjr3j"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601091817.20095.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart1625725.a2yBLqjr3j Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 09 January 2006 12:59, you wrote: > Ive been watching the qmail log on these servers and I began to see a bit > of a pattern after a while. > > These are not piped through tai64nlocal but it seems a process of qmail > delivery stops. > > When local (or rather all delivery to local and remote stops) this is what > I see in the log: > > @4000000043c2a7eb34f0b624 info msg 1500681: bytes 2494 from > qp 62294 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ec0f2478f4 new msg 1500685 > @4000000043c2a7ec0fd2f104 info msg 1500685: bytes 8456 from <> qp 62305 > uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ec1f9e5664 new msg 1500689 > @4000000043c2a7ec2018b684 info msg 1500689: bytes 9725 from > qp 62322 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ec38a1277c new msg 1500688 > @4000000043c2a7ec38a35de4 info msg 1500688: bytes 18811 from > qp 62311 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ed0915300c new msg 1500692 > @4000000043c2a7ed0943c5d4 info msg 1500692: bytes 14942 from > qp 62347 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ed1bc6409c new msg 1500683 > @4000000043c2a7ed1bd7a1d4 info msg 1500683: bytes 4066 from > qp 62340 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ed2c9ae06c new msg 1500686 > @4000000043c2a7ed2c9e66c4 info msg 1500686: bytes 4041 from <> qp 62342 > uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ee01bee44c new msg 1500682 > @4000000043c2a7ee01c17c5c info msg 1500682: bytes 9720 from > qp 62356 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ee18f86ee4 new msg 1500687 > @4000000043c2a7ee191d0de4 info msg 1500687: bytes 7759 from > qp 62364 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ee2f75b244 new msg 1500691 > @4000000043c2a7ee2f78e694 info msg 1500691: bytes 4418 from > qp 62385 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ef01027dd4 new msg 1500690 > @4000000043c2a7ef01144c6c info msg 1500690: bytes 4422 from > qp 62382 uid 0 > @4000000043c2a7ef0ee15574 new msg 1500695 > @4000000043c2a7ef0ee3d614 info msg 1500695: bytes 4278 from <> qp 62389 > uid 0 > > New msg, info, new, info etc...no delivery messages at all. No errors, > nothing. Delivery just stops. But Qmail keeps happily accepting new mail > into the queue. I watched this particular log for 15 mins and I did not > see one attempt at delivery. look upwards in that file and find a 'status' line and look. Are the=20 concurrencies maxed? if so, figure out why. You said in another (related) thread of yours that you were seeing lots of= =20 hung qmail-getpw processes... that's probably what's stopping local=20 deliveries. regardless, we need more information from you. how is your qmail set up? what's the full, unedited output of qmail-showctl what OS are you running? =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart1625725.a2yBLqjr3j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDwxkwyBTJv0gb9+IRAvSQAKCcMwu/ZPqaprfBQy64HWzq4sbNFACfTZ5A ZPRFPdl1wNsSkMaNDDcaxUo= =ze0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1625725.a2yBLqjr3j-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 02:13:00 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 55148 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 02:13:29 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 02:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 2538 invoked by uid 227); 10 Jan 2006 02:13:01 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.030521 secs); 10 Jan 2006 02:13:01 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 10 Jan 2006 02:13:01 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: sending multiple mails Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:13:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43C265A2.3010605@spectrum.net.in> <20060109153301.GA3694@localhost.localhost> <43C3155E.7060102@spectrum.net.in> In-Reply-To: <43C3155E.7060102@spectrum.net.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6905498.qPDnJx4cQh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601091813.00885.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart6905498.qPDnJx4cQh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 09 January 2006 18:01, anu bhaskar wrote: > K. Shantanu wrote: > > * anu bhaskar [060109 21:00]: > >> hi > >> what will qmail do if i try to send mails from different locations usi= ng > >> same email address at same time. > > > > huh!!! is this a trick question? > > this is not a trick. i have a client who tries to use same address in > two different branches. but randomly these two branches where not able > to send mails. they get connection timed out. i checked all the firewall > rules and mail client settings. no problems in them. qmail has no way of tracking who's sending what from where, when. Therefor= e,=20 if you're sending mail from two different locations at the same time from t= he=20 same envelope sender (or authenticated user, or whatever) it doesn't care. In the future, you should first come out and say what problem you're trying= to=20 solve, you'll get a better response from the list. so now that we know what your problem is.. if you can 'catch' it happening at certain times, check your smtp logs. If= =20 you're using tcpserver (which you should be), make sure you have the -v=20 option to tcpserver so it will log concurrency information. Then, when you= =20 are experiencing the problem, check the logs and see if your concurrency is= =20 maxed out. If it is, you'll need to increase the concurrency. =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart6905498.qPDnJx4cQh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDwxgsyBTJv0gb9+IRAjMwAKCZntG+AjBL+x/U4xJQ7PfsCE2p+QCg0+Cc pFTLdDaresZdLvTt0qJDC9s= =ryzP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6905498.qPDnJx4cQh-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 08:30:24 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 94410 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 08:31:27 -0000 Received: from 167.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua (HELO ilport.com.ua) (195.66.192.167) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 08:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 25787 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 08:30:38 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 25767, pid: 25769, t: 9.4006s scanners:none Received: from unknown (172.17.2.38) by 0 (172.16.22.5) with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2006 08:30:28 -0000 From: Denis Vlasenko To: "MikeA" Subject: Re: Problems Compiling Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:30:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <43C1DDFD.9080400@rickvanvliet.com> In-Reply-To: <43C1DDFD.9080400@rickvanvliet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601101030.24373.vda@ilport.com.ua> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on logic X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 On Monday 09 January 2006 05:52, Rick van Vliet wrote: > MikeA wrote: > > Perhaps. But he could have answered the questions like you did. You answered the question, helped me > > help myself, and then advised me what to learn. And you did it without snide remarks. That sure > > makes wanting to learn Linux more desirable. If that is how people are treated it is no wonder Linux > > > > Not trying to be arrogant, but if you want to continue down > > the non-MS road you'd best thicken up your skin. The sort > > Please do not top post. > Please do read the 12-steps linked below. > They will help smooth your path to enlightenment. Another useful thing to read is http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- vda From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 12:01:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 95673 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 12:02:16 -0000 Received: from web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com (209.191.85.97) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 12:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6174 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2006 12:01:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ccPRkrH9APXVQdDndfKjVpJr5xHPLrqjiHymSIbY7mb8iWxfvhjlQ9Y6www5nGzt8YHLwDKuICoVaoMyZc35nQmnlkBU3myTL/H7WG2enzIu3pP+i8KJNx+PdxIPcT6eYYWRnrf2qLc0ipwhs13eHyVyzzjbFgtnfhgjWdBRD2Y= ; Message-ID: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [220.227.186.21] by web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:01:20 PST Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:01:20 -0800 (PST) From: Jacob Subject: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-632315965-1136894480=:6024" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-632315965-1136894480=:6024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, I'm trying to develop a local intranet with a mail server as qmail. The local users use this system to send mails to each other (same mail server for incoming and outgoing mails). I have the following requirements. 1. When a mail is read by the addressed person (for the first time), an acknowledgement mail should go to the sender of the mail automatically (without asking the addressed person). 2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat file). 3. All the new mails should be allotted a unique-id such that users can refer those numbers while talking about it later. (the unique message id which is allotted by Qmail is pretty long and not easy to quote). Is there any method to add this as a seperate header, such that a mail could be searched with this particular number ? 4. Is there a commented version of qmail source code available ? Please help. I know I'm asking some basic questions. It would be great if you can give some directions atleast. Best Regards, Jacob __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --0-632315965-1136894480=:6024 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi,
I'm trying to develop a local intranet with a mail server as qmail. The local users use this system to send mails to each other (same mail server for incoming and outgoing mails). I have the following requirements.
 
1. When a mail is read by the addressed person (for the first time), an acknowledgement mail should go to the sender of the mail automatically (without asking the addressed person).
 
2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat file).
 
3. All the new mails should be allotted a unique-id such that users can refer those numbers while talking about it later. (the unique message id which is allotted by Qmail is pretty long and not easy to quote). Is there any method to add this as a seperate header, such that a mail could be searched with this pa ticular number ?
 
4. Is there a commented version of qmail source code available ?
 
Please help. I know I'm asking some basic questions.
It would be great if you can give some directions atleast.
 
Best Regards,
 Jacob

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --0-632315965-1136894480=:6024-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 13:55:11 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 54122 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 13:47:03 -0000 Received: from dc5.dimakhconsultants.com (64.34.193.249) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 13:47:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 16964 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 07:46:33 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.4.41) by dc5.dimakhconsultants.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 07:46:32 -0600 Received: (qmail 3705 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 13:55:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:25:11 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu" To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Message-ID: <20060110135511.GA3696@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * Jacob [060110 19:13]: > 1. When a mail is read by the addressed person (for the first time), an acknowledgement mail should go to the sender of the mail automatically (without asking the addressed person). How can someone control what is done at the email client end? Mail is read usually at email client end, it can be clients like mutt, thunderbird, OE or a webmail client. In that case you have to patch the client. > 2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat file). Priority is again a feature of email clients. Not all clients honour it. You can (in theory) write a filter which takes mail at SMTP level (see below) checks the priority bit and sends it to the printer. There are ofcourse a few more hacks that I can think of. > 3. All the new mails should be allotted a unique-id such that users can refer those numbers while talking about it later. (the unique message id which is allotted by Qmail is pretty long and not easy to quote). Is there any method to add this as a seperate header, such that a mail could be searched with this particular number ? Yes, again you might have to use patch qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch and maybe use qmail-qfilter to write a perl/python/shell/sed/awk plugin to add a X-Header. I have a feeling I have seen this before. Anyway qmail-scanner's source code can help for this addition of header thing. > 4. Is there a commented version of qmail source code available ? Not that I know of. But it is easy to pay someone to get it down. Even on this list there might be some people willing to do it for a price. > Please help. I know I'm asking some basic questions. > It would be great if you can give some directions atleast. Do you "really" need these features? Many a times they are simply not worth it. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 14:13:22 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 93945 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:13:52 -0000 Received: from c-65-96-207-76.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO tao.merseine.nu) (65.96.207.76) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:13:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 18814 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Jan 2006 14:13:22 -0000 From: dsr@tao.merseine.nu Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:13:22 -0500 To: Jacob Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Message-ID: <20060110141322.GC2394@tao.merseine.nu> Mail-Followup-To: Jacob , qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:01:20AM -0800, Jacob wrote: > 1. When a mail is read by the addressed person (for the first time), an acknowledgement mail should go to the sender of the mail automatically (without asking the addressed person). dot-qmail, plus a filter to keep track of unique addresses and send the acknowledgment. A combination of mailfilter or procmail and a short Perl script can do this. > 2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat file). Also dot-qmail, with a filter to check for this priority header and then send it off to the appropriate printer. > 3. All the new mails should be allotted a unique-id such that users can refer those numbers while talking about it later. (the unique message id which is allotted by Qmail is pretty long and not easy to quote). Is there any method to add this as a seperate header, such that a mail could be searched with this particular number ? You'll need to handle this with an input-side filter. Perhaps one of the virus-scanner systems can easily be modified to insert this header for you. Note that, since these things work in parallel, you either need to generate something like a Usenet-style Message-ID, complete with a timestamp down to a hundredth of a second plus a process-ID (hostname.2006091245.23012), or you need a single source of incrementing numbers which will serialize your system, and potentially slow it down. > 4. Is there a commented version of qmail source code available ? Not that I know of, but it's reasonably clearly written. -dsr- -- What's the best thing you could be doing right now? Why aren't you? From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 14:26:29 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 3094 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:18:20 -0000 Received: from dc5.dimakhconsultants.com (64.34.193.249) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:18:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 20252 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 08:17:50 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.4.41) by dc5.dimakhconsultants.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 08:17:50 -0600 Received: (qmail 3826 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 14:26:29 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:56:29 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu" To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Message-ID: <20060110142629.GA3821@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060110141322.GC2394@tao.merseine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110141322.GC2394@tao.merseine.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * dsr@tao.merseine.nu [060110 19:54]: > dot-qmail, plus a filter to keep track of unique addresses and > send the acknowledgment. A combination of mailfilter or procmail > and a short Perl script can do this. S**t I knew I would forget something. > > > 2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat file). > > Also dot-qmail, with a filter to check for this priority header > and then send it off to the appropriate printer. Same as above. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 14:42:09 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 29233 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:34:00 -0000 Received: from dc5.dimakhconsultants.com (64.34.193.249) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21552 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 08:33:30 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (59.95.4.41) by dc5.dimakhconsultants.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 08:33:30 -0600 Received: (qmail 4203 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 14:42:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:12:09 +0530 From: "K. Shantanu " To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Message-ID: <20060110144209.GA4198@localhost.localhost> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060110135511.GA3696@localhost.localhost> <20060110142619.93405.qmail@web37001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110142619.93405.qmail@web37001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i * Jacob [060110 20:10]: > Hi, > Thanks for your fast reply. Please see my queries (for the first 2 ) below. (...) Check dsr's reply. It is better. Shantanu www.shantanukulkarni.org From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 14:39:44 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 42185 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:40:40 -0000 Received: from ns2.winonaesolutions.net (HELO mail.winonaesolutions.net) (83.142.31.68) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:40:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 9262 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 15:42:49 -0000 Received: from host217-35-93-45.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO otto) (217.35.93.45) by mail.winonaesolutions.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 15:42:49 -0000 Message-ID: <00b101c615f3$b28b2ee0$2b00010a@otto> From: "Otto Villarin" To: Subject: Setting Return-path header or alternative method to capture undeliverable messages Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:39:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C615F3.B270F020" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C615F3.B270F020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all I am quite new to qmail related implementations and I am trying to = implement a mailing software solution that returns undeliverable emails = to an specific address, bounces@bla.com. Returned messages are later = processed to generate bounce backs statistics and for personel to look = at them when neccesary. Unfortunately I cannot set the sender-header to bounces@bla.com because = some email clients display the from address in the following format: = "bounces@bla.com on behalf of the_client_email_address". This is an = undesirable behaviour to our clients so the only way I have found to = avoid this is setting the return-path header in the messages and then = using qmail-inject direcly to inject the messages in the queue. So I would really appreciate if anyone could give some ligths on this = issues by answering the following questions: 1. Is there any way to specify the return-path when using the = qmail-smtpd and avoid it will be rewritten before it injects it in the = queue? 2. Alternatively is there any way to process undeliverable messages with = a custom header so these specific messsages are forwarded to an = especific email address. Many thanks in advance Otto ------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C615F3.B270F020 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear all
 
I am quite new to qmail related = implementations and=20 I am trying to implement a mailing = software=20 solution that returns undeliverable emails to an specific address, bounces@bla.com. Returned messages = are later=20 processed to generate bounce backs statistics and for personel to look = at them=20 when neccesary.
Unfortunately I cannot set the sender-header to = bounces@bla.com because some email = clients=20 display the from address in the following format: "bounces@bla.com on behalf of=20 the_client_email_address". This is an undesirable behaviour to our = clients so=20 the only way I have found to avoid this is setting the return-path = header=20 in the messages and then using qmail-inject direcly to inject the = messages in=20 the queue.
So I would really appreciate = if anyone=20 could give some ligths on this issues by answering the = following=20 questions:
 
1. Is there any way to specify the = return-path=20 when using the qmail-smtpd and avoid it will be rewritten before it = injects it=20 in the queue?
2. Alternatively is there any way to = process=20 undeliverable messages with a custom header so these specific messsages = are=20 forwarded to an especific email address.
 
Many thanks in advance
 
Otto
------=_NextPart_000_00AE_01C615F3.B270F020-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 15:10:57 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 89149 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 15:11:54 -0000 Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (81.228.11.98) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 15:11:54 -0000 Received: from safari.iki.fi (80.223.105.208) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43C38DD0000197D1 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:10:59 +0100 Received: (qmail 6016 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 15:10:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:10:57 +0200 From: Sami Farin To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Setting Return-path header or alternative method to capture undeliverable messages Message-ID: <20060110151057.GQ16973@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <00b101c615f3$b28b2ee0$2b00010a@otto> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b101c615f3$b28b2ee0$2b00010a@otto> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:39:44PM -0000, Otto Villarin wrote: > Dear all > > I am quite new to qmail related implementations and I am trying to implement > a mailing software solution that returns undeliverable emails to an specific > address, bounces@bla.com. Returned messages are later processed to generate > bounce backs statistics and for personel to look at them when neccesary. > Unfortunately I cannot set the sender-header to bounces@bla.com because some What do you mean by sender-header? Envelope sender (which is not header) or From: header field? > email clients display the from address in the following format: > "bounces@bla.com on behalf of the_client_email_address". This is an > undesirable behaviour to our clients so the only way I have found to avoid Is the client software coded by Microsoft? > this is setting the return-path header in the messages and then using > qmail-inject direcly to inject the messages in the queue. > So I would really appreciate if anyone could give some ligths on this issues > by answering the following questions: > > 1. Is there any way to specify the return-path when using the qmail-smtpd and > avoid it will be rewritten before it injects it in the queue? What? You want to modify envelope sender for emails received by qmail-smtpd? > 2. Alternatively is there any way to process undeliverable messages with a > custom header so these specific messsages are forwarded to an especific email > address. Well, I just use feature called ABBS. http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/qmail0403/161.html Or, to make it simpler, you can use qmail-1.03's feature in qmail-inject: set env var QMAILINJECT to contain 'r' and QMAILSUSER to contain 'luser-b', QMAILSHOST to contain the domain used in envelope sender (for example 'bounce.example.com') and then do: maildirmake ~luser/Maildir/bounce echo ./Maildir/bounce/ > ~luser/.qmail-b-default (and fix the perms... or pipe mail to a program which updates statistics and/or writes bounce to somewhere,...) now, mails to luser-b-department=fbi.gov@bounce.example.com go to luser's maildir at ~luser/Maildir/bounce . (with this simple method spammers can send emails to luser-b-anything=goes.com@bounce.example.com , with ABBS not.) > Many thanks in advance > > Otto -- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 14:56:09 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66904 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:57:09 -0000 Received: from jms.cc.uky.edu (128.163.18.106) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:57:09 -0000 Received: from jms.cc.uky.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jms.cc.uky.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34AEA1601 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:56:13 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20060110142629.GA3821@localhost.localhost> References: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060110141322.GC2394@tao.merseine.nu> <20060110142629.GA3821@localhost.localhost> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:56:09 -0500 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to From: Matt Simpson Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" At 7:56 PM +0530 1/10/06, K. Shantanu wrote: >S**t I knew I would forget something. No, you were right the first time. Dot-qmail files can only cause an acknowledgement to be sent when qmail places the mail in the recipient's mailbox, not when the message is actually read by the user. He might read it days or weeks later, or might not read it at all. Sending an acknowledgement when the user actually becomes aware of the email message's existence (even if he still chooses not to read it) requires control of the email client software. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 15:36:57 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 28468 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0000 Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (204.89.131.97) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 1132 invoked by uid 1003); 10 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0AFavpi012617; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:36:57 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0AFavMp013317; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:36:57 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:36:57 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Keith Woodworth Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Slow queues Message-ID: <20060110153656.GE1845@ayvali.org> References: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060107123043.K82884@pop.citytel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i * Keith Woodworth [2006-01-07 12:36:04 -0800]: > I have queues piling up. > > messages in queue: 53279 > messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 > > [...] > > We inherited three qmail systems and we run postfix and sendmail for > so long now I really dont know squat about qmail. We had the same exact problem. Someone was using us to spoof Sober virus-spam. After cleaning up the queue, we implemented a filtering solution which mostly fixed the problem. Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 16:20:16 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 95044 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 16:19:59 -0000 Received: from vqbnmx.vqbn.com (HELO wolf.viewqwest.com) (202.73.46.229) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 16:19:59 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C61601.DCB5B6B4" Subject: TLS errors Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:20:16 +0800 Message-ID: <7BF44E33CB52C5418DABACE782ACD74E35EAAB@wolf.viewqwest.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TLS errors Thread-Index: AcYV/Re+lJkglIVKRryyWEYxFHaciQABKZ1y From: "Mun Fai Lee" To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C61601.DCB5B6B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi =20 What do the following errors mean? =20 @4000000043c1fa880d72f094 delivery 40074: deferral: = TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ @4000000043c267e80e0827cc delivery 47518: deferral: = TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ @4000000043c2d868230fbb1c delivery 52161: deferral: = TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ @4000000043c34c0805840684 delivery 57685: deferral: = TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ @4000000043c3c2c82b2d98b4 delivery 64205: deferral: = TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ =20 =20 Rgds Lee ------_=_NextPart_001_01C61601.DCB5B6B4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Re: Slow queues=0A= =0A= =0A=
=0A=
Hi
=0A=
 
=0A=
What do the following errors =0A= mean?
=0A=
 
=0A=
@4000000043c1fa880d72f094 =0A= delivery 40074: deferral: =0A= TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./
@4000000043c267e80e0827cc =0A= delivery 47518: deferral: =0A= TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./
@4000000043c2d868230fbb1c =0A= delivery 52161: deferral: =0A= TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./
@4000000043c34c0805840684 =0A= delivery 57685: deferral: =0A= TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./
@4000000043c3c2c82b2d98b4 =0A= delivery 64205: deferral: =0A= TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ver= sion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./
=0A=
 
=0A=
 
=0A=
Rgds
=0A=
Lee
=0A= =0A= =0A= ------_=_NextPart_001_01C61601.DCB5B6B4-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 17:28:29 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 97439 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 17:28:57 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 17:28:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3574 invoked by uid 227); 10 Jan 2006 17:28:28 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.037682 secs); 10 Jan 2006 17:28:28 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 10 Jan 2006 17:28:28 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail server for local intranet - with extra requirements Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:29 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060110120120.6172.qmail@web37012.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart113706853.7lzSMI3ry8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601100928.29180.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart113706853.7lzSMI3ry8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 10 January 2006 04:01, you wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to develop a local intranet with a mail server as qmail. The > local users use this system to send mails to each other (same mail server > for incoming and outgoing mails). I have the following requirements. > > 1. When a mail is read by the addressed person (for the first time), an > acknowledgement mail should go to the sender of the mail automatically > (without asking the addressed person). look in your MUA for read receipts. This is not a qmail function. > 2. When a new mail with priority 'high' comes for a user, it should get > printed in a network printer which is set in a database table (or flat > file). why? so you can waste paper? You can't grep a dead tree. My guess is tha= t=20 most of those emails will be printed out and sit rotting in the printer. W= hy=20 would you get up and walk to the printer to check for urgent email? > 3. All the new mails should be allotted a unique-id such that users can > refer those numbers while talking about it later. (the unique message id > which is allotted by Qmail is pretty long and not easy to quote). Is there > any method to add this as a seperate header, such that a mail could be > searched with this particular number ? in order for the ID to be guaranteed 'unique' it has to be the way it is. = =20 Otherwise it's too easy to have collisions. > 4. Is there a commented version of qmail source code available ? qmail-1.03.tar.gz from djb is the only 'official' qmail distribution. > Please help. I know I'm asking some basic questions. > It would be great if you can give some directions atleast. If you're doing an intra-office communication system, you might be better o= ff=20 with something like a jabber server. =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart113706853.7lzSMI3ry8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDw+69yBTJv0gb9+IRAjs4AJkBv3VCMpj+0D3Z9zazgOnsP3jqpACg3CC3 hhSF3RdfpF+jvlaQziBc8ls= =5zc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart113706853.7lzSMI3ry8-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 16:43:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 18003 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 17:44:12 -0000 Received: from omta04ps.mx.bigpond.com (144.140.83.156) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 17:44:12 -0000 Received: from grunt ([149.167.122.141]) by omta04ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20060110174314.FEPU17345.omta04ps.mx.bigpond.com@grunt> for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:43:20 +1000 (EST) From: Richard Lyons X-X-Sender: rick@grunt To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: TLS errors In-Reply-To: <7BF44E33CB52C5418DABACE782ACD74E35EAAB@wolf.viewqwest.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Mun Fai Lee wrote: > @4000000043c1fa880d72f094 delivery 40074: deferral: TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_version_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ Could be a cipher list mismatch. 193.69.20.20 only supports DES-CBC3-SHA, RC4-MD5 and RC4-SHA, if your cipher list doesn't have them it will be difficult to establish an encrypted session. See also http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail&m=107867276026743&w=2, although since you're the client I'm not sure it it's relevant. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 20:51:38 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 92643 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 20:51:44 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO smtp.zedemail.net) (204.209.44.218) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 20:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 31450 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 20:50:59 -0000 Received: from smtp.zedemail.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) (204.209.44.218) by smtp.zedemail.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 20:50:59 -0000 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 From: Blair Lowe To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:51:38 -0700 Message-Id: <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 10:01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Blair Lowe wrote: > > Cool! > > Your message was top-posted. Please configure your MUA to quote correctly > before sending messages to mailing lists. If you don't know what this means, > read this: http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/T/top-post.html > > To learn what "quote correctly" means, read this: > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html > > If you are using an MS MUA, these free add-on packages can apparently fix > their quoting style for you: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ > > > > I wrote a simple client for qmail to forward email to SMS. > > > My uses qmail-queue. Simply add in dot-mail one line: > > > > > > |qmail-sms 160 5 user-smsblock@host.com 123456789@sms.host.net > > > > I tried it out and it seems OK on CentOS. > [...] > > My question is: I use vmailmgr, and have virtual users. The .qmail > > technique does not seem to work for an individual user eg. /home/ > name virtual user>/users//.qmail > > It does work. You just put the .qmail file in the wrong place -- you appear > to have done it the way the vpopmail MDA expects things, whereas vmailmgr lets > you use the native qmail way of doing it. > > Create the file /.qmail- instead and it will work > fine. If you have further questions about this, the vmailmgr list is probably > more appropriate. > > Charles Thanks Charles, that worked great. I do appreciate that, so don't please don't perceive the rest of this email as a flame as I could not email you directly due to your mailing list prefs. Not sure if I am a "garden variety idiot" or not, and according to your link it is great that people who use windoze mua are never that ;) My wastefull but possibly important rebuttal is that "Cool" is not a question or an answer, but rather an interjection, so it could be on any line top or bottom, and still not confuse the email. TTYL, Blair. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 23:41:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 46693 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 23:42:20 -0000 Received: from 240-7-237-24.gci.net (HELO destar.net) (24.237.7.240) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 23:42:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 323 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 23:41:47 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on otrta.destar.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-ng-0.1.6.4-03dc on otrta.destar.net Received: from 20-156-237-24-mvl.ewc.gci.net (24.237.156.20) by otrta.destar.net (192.168.9.3) with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2006 23:41:47 -0000 Message-ID: <43C4463A.3060108@destar.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:41:46 -0900 From: Jon Reynolds Reply-To: jonr@destar.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Blair Lowe wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 10:01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > My wastefull but possibly important rebuttal is that "Cool" is not a > question or an answer, but rather an interjection, so it could be on any > line top or bottom, and still not confuse the email. Blair, Did you honestly think you could upset the order of the universe and not pay the price? ;) Jon From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 10 23:50:21 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 61335 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 23:50:50 -0000 Received: from tranquility.scriptkitchen.com (qmailr@209.82.178.130) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 23:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13865 invoked by uid 227); 10 Jan 2006 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from kitchen@scriptkitchen.com by tranquility by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.22 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.061622 secs); 10 Jan 2006 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net (ca-yorbalnd-cuda2-c1a-157.anhmca.adelphia.net [68.169.250.157]) by tranquility.scriptkitchen.com ([209.82.178.131]) with ESMTP via SSL; 10 Jan 2006 23:50:21 -0000 From: Jeremy Kitchen Organization: GreyStar Solutions To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Top posting sucks, episode #30539428213489439 (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:50:21 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2132644.ApDgfkt02V"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601101550.21331.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> --nextPart2132644.ApDgfkt02V Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:51, you wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 10:01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Blair Lowe wrote: > > > Cool! > > > > Your message was top-posted. Please configure your MUA to quote > > correctly before sending messages to mailing lists. If you don't know > > what this means, read this: > > http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/T/top-post.html > > > > To learn what "quote correctly" means, read this: > > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html > > > > If you are using an MS MUA, these free add-on packages can apparently f= ix > > their quoting style for you: > > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ > > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ [snip] > Thanks Charles, that worked great. I do appreciate that, so don't please > don't perceive the rest of this email as a flame as I could not email > you directly due to your mailing list prefs. > > Not sure if I am a "garden variety idiot" or not, and according to your > link it is great that people who use windoze mua are never that ;) > > My wastefull but possibly important rebuttal is that "Cool" is not a > question or an answer, but rather an interjection, so it could be on any > line top or bottom, and still not confuse the email. but you also said more than "cool".. in fact, not counting "Cool!" you type= d=20 20 lines of text (also counting newlines and a closing. also, in this most recent email, you did not insert your response to Charle= s'=20 standard anti-top-posting header below it, you placed it all the way at the= =20 bottom of the message. I don't get it, is it really that hard to quote/trim messages? =2DJeremy =2D-=20 Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. --nextPart2132644.ApDgfkt02V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDxEg9yBTJv0gb9+IRAnIhAKC1TY4Xg+mvlMhO0NRUx6gK+FNnqACgy38Z G0nj8+jbepG3KTsCcsvH5HU= =SKti -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2132644.ApDgfkt02V-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 11 00:10:06 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 94175 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 00:10:18 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f04a067d.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (70.64.40.43) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 00:10:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29209 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jan 2006 00:10:06 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 021e9aaecec48c1efcc9c03bbe638dd7699954cb Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:10:06 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 Message-ID: <20060111001006.GA28916@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136926300.2003.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Blair Lowe wrote: > > > > It does work. You just put the .qmail file in the wrong place -- you > > appear to have done it the way the vpopmail MDA expects things, whereas > > vmailmgr lets you use the native qmail way of doing it. > > > > Create the file /.qmail- instead and it will > > work fine. If you have further questions about this, the vmailmgr list is > > probably more appropriate. > > Thanks Charles, that worked great. You're welcome. > I do appreciate that, so don't please don't perceive the rest of this email > as a flame as I could not email you directly due to your mailing list prefs. Uh-oh :). > Not sure if I am a "garden variety idiot" or not, and according to your link > it is great that people who use windoze mua are never that ;) Use of a braindead, non-standards-compliant, buggy, insecure MUA like MS Outhouse isn't generally a matter of idiocy. It's a matter of ignorance and apathy. That's a good thing, because while there's very little we can do about the amount of idiocy in the world, correcting ignorance and apathy is very easy. Consider my work to be a very small effort in helping to reduce the amount of ignorance and apathy in the world, and you'll see it it a less negative light. > My wastefull but possibly important rebuttal is that "Cool" is not a > question or an answer, but rather an interjection, so it could be on any > line top or bottom, and still not confuse the email. Somehow I disagree: --- > line top or bottom, and still not confuse the email. > question or an answer, but rather an interjection, so it could be on any > My wastefull but possibly important rebuttal is that "Cool" is not a ignorance and apathy in the world, and you'll see it it a less negative light. Consider my work to be a very small effort in helping to reduce the amount of very easy. about the amount of idiocy in the world, correcting ignorance and apathy is apathy. That's a good thing, because while there's very little we can do Outhouse isn't generally a matter of idiocy. It's a matter of ignorance and Use of a braindead, non-standards-compliant, buggy, insecure MUA like MS > it is great that people who use windoze mua are never that ;) > Not sure if I am a "garden variety idiot" or not, and according to your link Uh-oh :). > as a flame as I could not email you directly due to your mailing list prefs. > I do appreciate that, so don't please don't perceive the rest of this email You're welcome. > Thanks Charles, that worked great. > > > probably more appropriate. > > work fine. If you have further questions about this, the vmailmgr list is > > Create the file /.qmail- instead and it will > > > > vmailmgr lets you use the native qmail way of doing it. > > appear to have done it the way the vpopmail MDA expects things, whereas > > It does work. You just put the .qmail file in the wrong place -- you --- And that's /without/ the complete "lack of proper quoting characters" error that top-posting software generally /also/ foists on the unwary. If your MUA top-posts by default, that's a very, very strong indicator that it's probably not a very good MUA. Switch to something that quotes correctly by default, and it probably means the author took sufficient care that it's going to be a better MUA in other respects as well. Consider `mutt` if you're looking for a better MUA. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 11 01:23:00 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 89820 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 01:23:30 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 01:23:30 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF64367EC1; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:23:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: Jeremy Kitchen cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail queue In-Reply-To: <200601091817.20095.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> Message-ID: <20060110161602.C34896@pop.citytel.net> References: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> <200601091817.20095.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > look upwards in that file and find a 'status' line and look. Are the > concurrencies maxed? if so, figure out why. > > You said in another (related) thread of yours that you were seeing lots of > hung qmail-getpw processes... that's probably what's stopping local > deliveries. > > regardless, we need more information from you. > > how is your qmail set up? > what's the full, unedited output of qmail-showctl > what OS are you running? After much gnashing of teeth over this problem we pretty much found what the cause was. We are completely new to qmail and these systems so it took a while to get a good handle on how things operated. At first we were increasing the max incoming connections and such but as it turns out Qmail relies heavily on a mySQL backend for various things and until we looked at the SQL stuff we were kinda shooting ourselves in the foot. It seems the main problem was the sql server was running out of connections. And the connections that were open were not being reused. Mysql had a wait_timeout of about 8 hrs. And with 3 qmail servers all hammering at the same database, opening a lot of connections, it didnt take long for mysql to run out of max_connections. Once we looked closely at the mysql server stats we could see what was happening then changed the max_connections and the timeout value and restarted qmail one last time and things are coming along nicely. Though in one queue there were 100k+ messages and in 16 hrs it has barely gone through half of them. And all these machines are quad Xeon 2.8ghz machines with tons of ram. But on the bright side mail has stopped being queued and they are steadily dropping. So it was not qmail after all. It was doing the right thing all along. It was something else causing the problems. Thanks for all your help folks. Keith. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 11 03:34:03 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 35238 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 03:34:45 -0000 Received: from smtp.gfn.org (HELO gfn.org) (205.145.130.34) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 03:34:45 -0000 X-Delivered-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: from gfn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0B3Y3Gu027735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:34:03 -0500 Received: (from swgsh@localhost) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.9/Submit) id k0B3Y3Ni027734; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:34:03 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gfn.org: swgsh set sender to sgifford@suspectclass.com using -f To: Keith Woodworth Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail queue References: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> <200601091817.20095.kitchen@scriptkitchen.com> <20060110161602.C34896@pop.citytel.net> From: Scott Gifford Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:34:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060110161602.C34896@pop.citytel.net> (Keith Woodworth's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:23:00 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 X-Scanned-By: milter-date/0.6.73 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:34:03 -0500 X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:34:03 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO Keith Woodworth writes: [...] > We are completely new to qmail and these systems so it took a while to > get a good handle on how things operated. At first we were increasing the > max incoming connections and such but as it turns out Qmail relies > heavily on a mySQL backend for various things and until we looked at the > SQL stuff we were kinda shooting ourselves in the foot. FYI, stock qmail doesn't use mySQL at all. So one of your first steps in figuring out what patches where applied to your system. -----Scott. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 11 11:32:18 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6156 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 11:32:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO serenity.infeline.org) (217.144.230.29) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 11:32:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 18747 invoked by uid 1036); 11 Jan 2006 11:32:31 -0000 Received: from 213.239.78.130 by serenity (envelope-from , uid 1006) with qmail-scanner-1.25 ( Clear:RC:0(213.239.78.130):. Processed in 1.210228 secs); 11 Jan 2006 11:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.14.0.57?) (213.239.78.130) by serenity.infeline.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 11:32:29 -0000 Message-ID: <43C4ECC2.3080503@froyn.name> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:32:18 +0100 From: Ketil Froyn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Woodworth CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Mail queue References: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> In-Reply-To: <20060109124712.G13283@pop.citytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Keith Woodworth wrote: > I wondering if qmail-scanner is having some problems here. From what I > understand qmail-scanner takes mail from the queue and puts a mail through > whatever its been setup to do then if it passes gets delivered. I saw something similar in the logs while I was tuning a qmail installation. qmail-scanner passed mail to clamscan to check for virus, but in some cases (for large emails) clamscan couldn't allocate any more memory and died ungracefully. Check your qmail-scanner logs to see what happens when qmail doesn't log anything else. Ketil From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 01:38:05 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 13581 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 01:36:59 -0000 Received: from vqbnmx.vqbn.com (HELO wolf.viewqwest.com) (202.73.46.229) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 01:36:59 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: TLS errors Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:38:05 +0800 Message-ID: <7BF44E33CB52C5418DABACE782ACD74E40881F@wolf.viewqwest.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TLS errors Thread-Index: AcYWDr01mhr5CkJOT56uyty/F3KopQBCfkMA From: "Mun Fai Lee" To: "Richard Lyons" , > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Lyons [mailto:frob-qmail@webcentral.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:43 AM > To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to > Subject: Re: TLS errors >=20 > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Mun Fai Lee wrote: >=20 > > @4000000043c1fa880d72f094 delivery 40074: deferral: > TLS_connect_failed:_error:1408F10B:SSL_routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong_ve rs > ion_number;_connected_to_193.69.20.20./ >=20 > Could be a cipher list mismatch. 193.69.20.20 only supports DES-CBC3-SHA, > RC4-MD5 and RC4-SHA, if your cipher list doesn't have them it will be > difficult to establish an encrypted session. >=20 > See also = http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dqmail&m=3D107867276026743&w=3D2, > although since you're the client I'm not sure it it's relevant. >=20 > Rick. How then do I check my cipher list, and add ciphers to it? Rgds From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 01:49:26 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 30437 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from bne002se.server-mail.com (203.147.241.113) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 01:50:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 30113 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 01:49:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.21.22) (192.168.21.22) by bne002se.server-mail.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 01:49:29 -0000 Subject: RE: TLS errors From: Richard Lyons To: qmail list In-Reply-To: <7BF44E33CB52C5418DABACE782ACD74E40881F@wolf.viewqwest.com> References: <7BF44E33CB52C5418DABACE782ACD74E40881F@wolf.viewqwest.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:49:26 +1000 Message-Id: <1137030566.13550.23.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 09:38 +0800, Mun Fai Lee wrote: > How then do I check my cipher list, and add ciphers to it? Depends on which patch you are using for TLS, you'll need to check your documentation on how to control the cipher list for your server. The ciphers available can be listed with the openssl ciphers command, man ciphers for more info. Rick. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 05:34:39 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 58013 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 05:35:34 -0000 Received: from web37011.mail.mud.yahoo.com (209.191.85.96) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 05:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 5198 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 05:34:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ntyhg7b1ipIzqhd011Hg9lQLNG9wM26r9IeZA9AERgV9XzVoaho730y7nTRCSOoqNPIqecbQj8gF8pN/ysA/+Hf3z5B2EJ3BFtV6FNqxEGuH6XS+VjhqLTXMguq7FjvGwfEUDYe86smQA2KSd9Z5Iy0xMIW8B2XnMqwTlXM1En4= ; Message-ID: <20060112053439.5196.qmail@web37011.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [220.227.186.21] by web37011.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:34:39 PST Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:34:39 -0800 (PST) From: nancy rapheal Subject: GSM support and acknowledgement To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1665262051-1137044079=:4594" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-1665262051-1137044079=:4594 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, 1)How do qmail provide GSM support? Is there any patch for that? The requirement is to send sms alerts for priority mails. 2) How can i configure acknowlegement for read mails? Thanks n Regards, Nancy --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --0-1665262051-1137044079=:4594 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi,
 
1)How do qmail provide GSM support? Is there any patch for that? The requirement is to send sms alerts for priority mails.
 
2) How can i configure acknowlegement for read mails?
 
Thanks n Regards,
Nancy

Yahoo! Photos
Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. --0-1665262051-1137044079=:4594-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 06:50:49 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 39633 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 06:51:55 -0000 Received: from ns2.unics.co.za (HELO mail.unics.co.za) (196.34.228.220) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 06:51:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25711 invoked by uid 519); 12 Jan 2006 06:44:42 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.59 by gatekeeper.unics.co.za (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1162. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.59):. Processed in 0.074052 secs); 12 Jan 2006 06:44:42 -0000 X-Antivirus-unics.co.za-Mail-From: doug@interserve.co.za via gatekeeper.unics.co.za X-Antivirus-unics.co.za: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.59):. Processed in 0.074052 secs Process 25704) Received: from unknown (HELO aireal) (192.168.1.59) by mail.unics.co.za with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 06:44:42 -0000 From: "Douglas Lane" To: Subject: filtering mail Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:50:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYXQ847xrOr8XnbSHeyqoOXqF77FQ== X-Antivirus-unics.co.za-Message-ID: <1137048282109625704@gatekeeper.unics.co.za> Hi all, One of my clients wants to forward all email from a specific domain, say *@example.com to his email address bob@microsoft.com. The problem is, the qmail server is just acting as a relay server and forwards all email for the clients domain to their internal groupwise server. Is it possible on the qmail server to setup a rule to forward all email from *@example.com to another email address. Thanks in advance! From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 08:32:06 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 42841 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 08:33:05 -0000 Received: from goss.dedies.lost-oasis.net (HELO mail.v-linux.com) (212.85.152.59) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 08:33:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 29253 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 08:32:06 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 29249, pid: 29250, t: 0.0446s scanners: regex: 1.2.0 attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:34/d:1195 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.linuxpourtous.com) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 08:32:06 -0000 Received: from 82.127.101.47 (SquirrelMail authenticated user franck@linuxpourtous.com) by webmail.linuxpourtous.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:32:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <61223.82.127.101.47.1137054726.squirrel@webmail.linuxpourtous.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:32:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: filtering mail From: "Franck" To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Reply-To: franck@linuxpourtous.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Hello, > Hi all, > > One of my clients wants to forward all email from a specific domain, say > *@example.com to his email address bob@microsoft.com. The problem is, the > qmail server is just acting as a relay server and forwards all email for > the > clients domain to their internal groupwise server. Is it possible on the > qmail server to setup a rule to forward all email from *@example.com to > another email address. > > Thanks in advance! http://www.inter7.com/index.php?page=qmailtap Franck -- http://www.linuxpourtous.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 10:36:00 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66573 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 10:31:07 -0000 Received: from manaslu.mos.com.np (202.52.255.3) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 10:31:07 -0000 Received: from nuptse. (nuptse.mos.com.np [202.52.255.8]) by manaslu.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id k0CATsL4032388 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:15:05 +0545 Received: from langtang.mos.com.np ([202.52.255.9]) by nuptse. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2006011216150705305 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:15:07 -0800 Received: from SwissArmyKnife (mc-gw.mos.com.np [202.52.255.100]) by langtang.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k0CATuH2020936 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:15:05 +0545 Message-ID: <01c201c61764$031a6df0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> From: "SangFroid" To: References: <61223.82.127.101.47.1137054726.squirrel@webmail.linuxpourtous.com> Subject: log format of qmail-pop3d and vpopmail Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:21:00 +0545 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1238/Wed Jan 11 16:04:06 2006 on manaslu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1238/Wed Jan 11 16:04:06 2006 on langtang.mos.com.np X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi I have installed vpopmail and qmail-pop3d as per instructions in qmailrocks. But my problem is , when my users supply the wrong password, it is not being logged in /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d with detail information. It is simply logging as below: @4000000043c62f902f260f8c tcpserver: pid 26436 from 202.79.233.24 @4000000043c62f902f4c15ec tcpserver: ok 26436 mail.test.com:202.2.25.246:110 :202.79.233.24::46572 @4000000043c62f90307989cc tcpserver: end 26436 status 256 @4000000043c62f90307be744 tcpserver: status: 0/100 @4000000043c6302f27304b94 tcpserver: status: 1/100 I cannot see which user is poppping his emails and iff that user provides wrong password, I have not been able to figure out that he is supplying wrong password . How do I change this log format so that it will be as per my requirements ? Thanking you Sang From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 11:00:52 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 249 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 11:01:24 -0000 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (64.233.184.204) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 11:01:24 -0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so385363wri for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:00:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fDovtk/rJkuuJbpwIGaDeQscjPpu2Oouf/X+whkGuv/uyKAcfNTrwyWxw9K8vFcq8Avc33bPHjaVtw6i4pl30x5Bdd6ybal9EDhD62RgZUIyrSdPlPVQbB41LPh6nnUh8ZrJH2UoX22qxO/shn6Jiqu50R9drhpi7wh6OCTzv/g= Received: by 10.54.114.4 with SMTP id m4mr2396598wrc; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:00:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.123.4 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:00:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:00:52 +0100 From: Cristiano Deana To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: log format of qmail-pop3d and vpopmail In-Reply-To: <01c201c61764$031a6df0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <61223.82.127.101.47.1137054726.squirrel@webmail.linuxpourtous.com> <01c201c61764$031a6df0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> 2006/1/12, SangFroid : > I cannot see which user is poppping his emails and iff that user > provides wrong password, I have not been able to figure out that he is > supplying wrong password . How do I change this log format so that it wil= l > be as per my requirements ? It's a VPOPMAIL compile option, not qmail related. see ./configure --help of vpopmail. You can log wrong password, wrong user,= etc. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 12:48:28 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 12991 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 12:48:57 -0000 Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (195.54.107.73) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 12:48:57 -0000 Received: from theflow.se ([83.227.229.8] [83.227.229.8]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with SMTP id <20060112124801.ZWHA2008.mxfep02.bredband.com@theflow.se> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:48:01 +0100 Received: (qmail 73043 invoked by uid 1009); 12 Jan 2006 12:48:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail.theflow.se) (127.0.0.1) by theflow.se with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 12:48:28 -0000 Received: from 212.112.184.254 (SquirrelMail authenticated user erik@terapeutikum.se); by mail.theflow.se with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:48:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <6173.212.112.184.254.1137070108.squirrel@212.112.184.254> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:48:28 +0100 (CET) Subject: when to use what? From: erik@terapeutikum.se To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Hi, Could sombody explain for a newbe (me) how qmail-qmtpd and qmail-qmqpd works and when to use what. This is the scenario that i would like to setup: Four boxes thats gonna comunicate with two qmail-servers. I dont want thoose four boxes to have any queues localy, I want all and every mail to be shipped straight to any of the qmail machines. So what do i need to set this up? box1 box2 box3 box | | | | -------------------- | | qmail_1 qmail_2 ------- | INTERNET I've looked at the man pages and the "big picture" but I cant seem to get it anyway... Glad for help / Erik From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 14:01:57 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 90145 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 14:02:09 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f04a067d.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (70.64.40.43) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 14:02:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 9941 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jan 2006 14:01:58 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: b49dc3004f7bbdf53e933effb0122544b518b88f Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:01:57 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: GSM support and acknowledgement Message-ID: <20060112140157.GC9828@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060112053439.5196.qmail@web37011.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112053439.5196.qmail@web37011.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 nancy rapheal wrote: > > 1)How do qmail provide GSM support? Is there any patch for that? The > requirement is to send sms alerts for priority mails. Lots of people have done smtp-to-sms gateway type things; qmail is just as capable of using them as anything else. Do you have a specific question we can help you with? > 2) How can i configure acknowlegement for read mails? The MTA is not involved in this; it's purely a matter for the MUAs. If you turn on "read receipts" functionality in your MUA that you use with qmail, it'll work just fine. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 14:06:38 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 97480 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 14:06:50 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f04a067d.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (70.64.40.43) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 14:06:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9972 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jan 2006 14:06:39 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 8437d054aa4dfd57f9da659d60906fc4ed71a97d Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:06:38 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: when to use what? Message-ID: <20060112140638.GD9828@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <6173.212.112.184.254.1137070108.squirrel@212.112.184.254> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6173.212.112.184.254.1137070108.squirrel@212.112.184.254> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 erik@terapeutikum.se wrote: > > Could sombody explain for a newbe (me) how qmail-qmtpd and qmail-qmqpd > works and when to use what. QMQP and QMTP are mail transmission protocols that don't suffer from some of the problems of SMTP. QMTP can be used on a public interface; QMQP is only suitable for use with trusted clients. > This is the scenario that i would like to setup: > > Four boxes thats gonna comunicate with two qmail-servers. I dont want > thoose four boxes to have any queues localy, I want all and every mail to > be shipped straight to any of the qmail machines. > > So what do i need to set this up? Set up one normal qmail server. Run qmail-qmqpd on it on the LAN-side only (or use a firewall to restrict access to that service). Then install a "mini-qmail" installation on each of the four machines you want to run queue-less; mini-qmail is essentially a qmail installation that uses a QMQP client as a replacement for qmail-queue, so messages are queued to the remote QMQP server. See qmail.org for additional documentation on this. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 21:44:32 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 62004 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 21:45:10 -0000 Received: from 216-55-183-17.dedicated.abac.net (216.55.183.17) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 21:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 1287 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2006 21:41:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO PCfwk) (joe@titanalliance.com@68.41.234.79) by 216-55-183-17.dedicated.abac.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 21:41:35 -0000 From: "Joe" To: Subject: What can cause message refused error? Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:44:32 -0500 Message-ID: <00ab01c617c1$6203c8e0$6400a8c0@PCfwk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C61797.792DC0E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C61797.792DC0E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I sent someone an email and received the following message. What can cause this? 172.18.1.64 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused I was sending an email, with a Word doc attached. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C61797.792DC0E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I sent someone an email and received the following = message.=A0 What can cause this?

 

<email address of the intended recipient is = listed>

172.18.1.64 failed = after I sent the message.

Remote host said: = 550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused

 

 

I was sending an email, with a Word doc = attached.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: = 1/10/2006

------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C61797.792DC0E0-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 22:09:15 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 92298 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 22:09:46 -0000 Received: from asbak.coding-slaves.com (qmailr@82.93.81.131) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:09:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 743 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 22:09:15 -0000 Received: from grolsch.home.lan (HELO ?10.10.10.2?) (10.10.10.2) by 0 with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:09:15 -0000 Message-ID: <43C6D38B.8080503@asbak.coding-slaves.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:09:15 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: What can cause message refused error? References: <00ab01c617c1$6203c8e0$6400a8c0@PCfwk> In-Reply-To: <00ab01c617c1$6203c8e0$6400a8c0@PCfwk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/12/2006 10:44 PM +0200, Joe wrote: > I sent someone an email and received the following message. What can cause > this? Anything can. > > > 172.18.1.64 failed after I sent the message. > > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused The remote server gave this as a reason, not a very clear one. > I was sending an email, with a Word doc attached. Try sending it zipped. if that doesn't work, contact 172.18.1.64's admin. Regards, Niek From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 22:30:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 16773 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 22:30:44 -0000 Received: from izb.knu.ac.kr (155.230.157.93) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:30:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 3665 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:30:12 +0900 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s512; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; b=vhqNE8zA0zB8mBB1k7+YzL5oBSWfyURsMx12EFr373dNGpggjpJVXIjvcA8DaqgekDi7sd5cP3JB7F+T6T4dMQ== ; Received: from e.mx (HELO i.mx) (2002:9be6:9d5d:2::1) by e.mx (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:30:12 +0900 Received: (qmail 3655 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:30:11 +0900 Received: from viola.izb.knu.ac.kr (2002:9be6:9d5d:2::2) by i.mx (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:30:11 +0900 Received: by viola.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 742D06726; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0700 From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Cc: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-sms-0.1 Message-ID: <20060112152525.Nt39SnNP9v.bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> References: <20051220192446.1478.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <1136595235.4849.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060107160153.GA19063@discworld.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: InZealBomb X-URL: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-PGP-Key-URL: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD43E29A8 X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: ED37 33FB 641F 9A0B 3FD8 F0BF 6775 666B D43E 29A8 X-PGP-Key-Expires: 2006-06-30 UTC X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE X-Originating-IP: 2002:9be6:9d5d:2::2 On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 10:01:53 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Blair Lowe wrote: > > Cool! > > Your message was top-posted. Please configure your MUA to quote correctly > before sending messages to mailing lists. If you don't know what this means, > read this: http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/T/top-post.html > > To learn what "quote correctly" means, read this: > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html > > If you are using an MS MUA, these free add-on packages can apparently fix ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > their quoting style for you: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ > http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ > [...snip...] He has used Evolution under Gnome2. -- Byung-Hee From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 22:49:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 39595 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 22:49:52 -0000 Received: from riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (mail@62.44.100.74) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:49:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 2481 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Jan 2006 22:49:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:49:20 +0200 From: Nikola To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi people! I wrote a simple program which check email header for RBL listed IP. It uses only DJB functions and has 100 lines code. http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/docs/qmail-rbl.html Enjoy, Nikola Vladov From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 23:51:11 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6373 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 23:51:47 -0000 Received: from pool-141-149-38-158.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (141.149.38.158) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 23:51:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 12178 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 23:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 23:43:05 -0000 Message-ID: <43C6EB6F.6080206@gatworks.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:11 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Its interesting that the concept of a white-list feature does not exist. Recently I had to whitelist this mail-list, as folks were reporting spam from this list, and got listed on an RBL. Nikola wrote: > Hi people! > > I wrote a simple program which check email header for RBL listed IP. > It uses only DJB functions and has 100 lines code. > > http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/docs/qmail-rbl.html > > Enjoy, Nikola Vladov > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Thu Jan 12 22:14:37 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 247 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 22:15:11 -0000 Received: from 216-55-183-17.dedicated.abac.net (216.55.183.17) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:15:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4652 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2006 22:11:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO PCfwk) (joe@titanalliance.com@68.41.234.79) by 216-55-183-17.dedicated.abac.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:11:36 -0000 From: "Joe" To: Subject: RE: What can cause message refused error? Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:14:37 -0500 Message-ID: <00bf01c617c5$9420c6d0$6400a8c0@PCfwk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 In-Reply-To: <43C6D38B.8080503@asbak.coding-slaves.com> -----Original Message----- From: Niek [mailto:niek@asbak.coding-slaves.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 5:09 PM To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: What can cause message refused error? On 1/12/2006 10:44 PM +0200, Joe wrote: > I sent someone an email and received the following message. What can cause > this? Anything can. > > > 172.18.1.64 failed after I sent the message. > > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused The remote server gave this as a reason, not a very clear one. > I was sending an email, with a Word doc attached. Try sending it zipped. if that doesn't work, contact 172.18.1.64's admin. Regards, Niek Thank you. Will do so. Joe -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 00:38:26 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 61673 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 00:37:56 -0000 Received: from mail.el.net (68.165.89.91) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 00:37:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 16184 invoked by uid 1008); 13 Jan 2006 00:38:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 00:38:26 -0000 Received: from 68.165.89.78 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:38:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:38:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: spamcontrol patches From: "kalin mintchev" To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal hi all... recently our mail server was listed with an rbl db because the machine sends out the autoreplies with the spam message in it. on the spamcop site: http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html it says that the spamcontrol patch helps to avoid that situation. the thing is i have the patched installed. it's been in place for about 6 months maybe. the listing in the rbl happened 2 weeks ago. can somebody please explain if there is a particular configuration file that is needed for the patches in spamcontrol to avoid this situation. or is there a way to use autorespond without including the original message or just stop using autorespond and use a custom 550 message? thanks a lot.... -- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 03:54:31 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 68481 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 03:55:17 -0000 Received: from c180636.static.uniserve.ca (HELO fong.bueller.ca) (216.113.195.89) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 03:55:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 44523 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 03:56:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.1?) (matt@bueller.ca@207.194.110.190) by fong.bueller.ca with ESMTPA; 13 Jan 2006 03:56:50 -0000 Message-ID: <43C72477.2050902@bueller.ca> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:54:31 -0800 From: Matt Ferris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kalin mintchev CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: spamcontrol patches References: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit kalin mintchev wrote: > recently our mail server was listed with an rbl db because the machine > sends out the autoreplies with the spam message in it. > on the spamcop site: > http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html > > it says that the spamcontrol patch helps to avoid that situation. the > thing is i have the patched installed. it's been in place for about 6 > months maybe. Actually it lists the SPAMCONTROL patch as a solution for misdirected bounces. This works because (configured properly) SPAMCONTROL allows you to bounce mail destined to nonexistent accounts during the SMTP session. In your situation, I'm assuming the recipient has an existing account on the system, therefore mail addressed to the recipient will be accepted regardless of this feature. > can somebody please explain if there is a particular configuration file > that is needed for the patches in spamcontrol to avoid this situation. > > or is there a way to use autorespond without including the original > message or just stop using autorespond and use a custom 550 message? In would venture to guess that the reason you were listed on SpamCop wasn't because your reply contained the original message, instead it has to do with the fact that you replied at all. The forged sender's address was probably one of SpamCop's "secret" honeypot addresses. Because these addresses aren't published anywhere (as far as I know), they assume that any messages that are received via these addresses come from spammers. Thus your reply to the forged honeypot address would make it appear as though you were a spammer which would result in your listing within their database. So yes, a 550 message would perhaps be a safer way of implementing this kind of feature, however, I'm can't think of any easy way implenting this off the top of my head. You may be able to find something along these lines at www.qmail.org. -- Matt Ferris matt@bueller.ca From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 06:50:11 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 52218 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 06:50:58 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO techno.sub.ru) (86@213.247.139.22) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 06:50:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33676 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 06:50:27 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO localhost) (213.247.139.22) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 06:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 30321-03; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:24 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tarkhil.rostokino.net (HELO ?192.168.1.72?) (tarkhil%sub.ru@85.192.19.9) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 06:50:24 -0000 Message-ID: <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:11 +0300 From: Alex Povolotsky User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikola CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> In-Reply-To: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.sub.ru Nikola wrote: >Hi people! > >I wrote a simple program which check email header for RBL listed IP. >It uses only DJB functions and has 100 lines code. > >http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/docs/qmail-rbl.html > >Enjoy, Nikola Vladov > > Unfortunately, this sort of programs is of very limited use. 1. My authorized clients may come from RBL'ed addresses. For instance, I don't want to receive messages from adsl/dialup pools, EXCEPT mail from my clients. 2. Quite the same - but for clients of any other mail servers. 3. When mail checker scans the mail, it has been already received. The only address to be scanned by RBL is address of remote host during SMTP session. IMHO, of course. Alex. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:21:07 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 88100 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:21:37 -0000 Received: from dns.a-i-p.it (HELO aipnet.it) (212.39.9.100) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:21:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 14057 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:21:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO home.morettoni.local) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 88183 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2006 07:21:29 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:21:07 +0100 From: Luca Morettoni To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c Message-ID: <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> X-GPG-Key: http://morettoni.net/key/ X-GPG-Fingerprint: D69411BB/C329AED4592319826F12 3036B51E664FD69411BB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:49:48AM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > 1. My authorized clients may come from RBL'ed addresses. For instance, I= =20 > don't want to receive messages from adsl/dialup pools, EXCEPT mail from= =20 > my clients. the new release of qmail-rblchk can do that > 2. Quite the same - but for clients of any other mail servers. > 3. When mail checker scans the mail, it has been already received. sure, but when you check mails in local delivery you can store that in separates folders (insted of reject false positive match) --=20 Luca Morettoni - http://morettoni.net GUFI staff/core member - http://gufi.org AIP/ITCS member #2589 | FreeSBIE developer Current system: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE, up 2 days, 20 hrs, 52 mins, 19 secs --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIrgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIInzCCCJsCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BiUwggLeMIICR6ADAgECAhBehVA1a2t4ZnB5PPdnq1c6MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMGIxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYD VQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNjAxMDkxMTI1 MzFaFw0wNzAxMDkxMTI1MzFaMEQxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIx ITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEmx1Y2FAbW9yZXR0b25pLm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMIjTLrMYXWCKz7hlFmXXwpRDuHvgM3KsEjirFoosrUBN1SYuDEyLei9 BkCinO/8h78wrwqSngdujRvEQfp7qRLtjEiTKiLDyb4llgYJUs2U9+Vw2bElG+sjdkqQqFJB NG+cfxpv+b1jg8fi4tba7tFkfRm+AxqFt8iy7xmkpJA7W8FNySX4j/y7p8pmCS1FTwPxIRzs 6Qq5Vy0Fa076RMT3ly6IpETMVCDRGSeAsbXnco7MZrrjI+uoL0h45k4/LJutDRncbRMDtc1R 5OMyF4LPCAiOsdr07jYwDbLqUlx08Z7S16FiJcpIVwSHHDOc/+ZaHwPZK11D72PahZUOLhEC AwEAAaMvMC0wHQYDVR0RBBYwFIESbHVjYUBtb3JldHRvbmkubmV0MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAICxRra0JdPjL0CFfyn4yd6VKzd80UOKm2F+K2HAQIRADlW+V 2H+llgJVbPoOCsuQF7CGj8d571HUfH2FZMU/Oy83fP4d5xmokIRl17J/z19QuqujfeVeTSUz Qvb3tYt6A62KJN5DDIcmE9f0fag3SqaiVbwfRV1N+5XKtW4NvdgwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgEN MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBl MRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYD VQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUg UGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWls QHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQG EwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMj VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD gY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTl UAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIAC ZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgw BgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3Rl UGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAY BgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2j ZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguC dJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4k sdMdRv9dX2VPMYICUTCCAk0CAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEF6FUDVra3hmcHk892erVzowCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCBsTAYBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAxMTMwNzIxMDZaMCMGCSqG SIb3DQEJBDEWBBRboz/K6juF5FZ6Fv1TGl2vFIXMiDBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqG SIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG 9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQACRhqEYBPOzUrHQJyEnEG3bcHmdWf1BdRB/hHT E8TnhhdrqHbDxcH5JTlqzD3anGCx9Td6V9AkIAxixKn9a2utlI76KpZnpPYYgKp3b1dl1O8Q M0z27xgqHwpOQ1zMdNfjExjGeZoD73pGPjQ3f4V7i0KLBqVRrIq6CMUi38Q0w2R1pq1TVuPZ OsD7siLG12RIKeJjWL28FhWyt6an4V3hq2X8I9Q0uZT0TKKtaK9Abz+iIEyZlaDKvul2g1N0 FyIzkHUfGjaqR5GgS4sYVhKViHh+YNVjduFxxkGHN7By85fsjbYx0VHzoovtA3gYUJbsEFpN h1M9watJiGQlAwsu --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:19:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 85904 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:19:45 -0000 Received: from dns.a-i-p.it (HELO aipnet.it) (212.39.9.100) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:19:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 13012 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:19:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO home.morettoni.local) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:19:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 88144 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2006 07:19:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:19:14 +0100 From: Luca Morettoni To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c Message-ID: <20060113071913.GA88103@morettoni.net> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> X-GPG-Key: http://morettoni.net/key/ X-GPG-Fingerprint: D69411BB/C329AED4592319826F12 3036B51E664FD69411BB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:48:57AM +0200, Nikola wrote: > Hi people! >=20 > I wrote a simple program which check email header for RBL listed IP. > It uses only DJB functions and has 100 lines code. =20 >=20 > http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/docs/qmail-rbl.html work like my project: http://morettoni.net/qmail-rblchk.en.html (new release is coming in few days with some new features...) bye! --=20 Luca Morettoni - http://morettoni.net GUFI staff/core member - http://gufi.org AIP/ITCS member #2589 | FreeSBIE developer Current system: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE, up 2 days, 20 hrs, 51 mins, 2 secs --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIrgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIInzCCCJsCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BiUwggLeMIICR6ADAgECAhBehVA1a2t4ZnB5PPdnq1c6MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMGIxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYD VQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNjAxMDkxMTI1 MzFaFw0wNzAxMDkxMTI1MzFaMEQxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIx ITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEmx1Y2FAbW9yZXR0b25pLm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMIjTLrMYXWCKz7hlFmXXwpRDuHvgM3KsEjirFoosrUBN1SYuDEyLei9 BkCinO/8h78wrwqSngdujRvEQfp7qRLtjEiTKiLDyb4llgYJUs2U9+Vw2bElG+sjdkqQqFJB NG+cfxpv+b1jg8fi4tba7tFkfRm+AxqFt8iy7xmkpJA7W8FNySX4j/y7p8pmCS1FTwPxIRzs 6Qq5Vy0Fa076RMT3ly6IpETMVCDRGSeAsbXnco7MZrrjI+uoL0h45k4/LJutDRncbRMDtc1R 5OMyF4LPCAiOsdr07jYwDbLqUlx08Z7S16FiJcpIVwSHHDOc/+ZaHwPZK11D72PahZUOLhEC AwEAAaMvMC0wHQYDVR0RBBYwFIESbHVjYUBtb3JldHRvbmkubmV0MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAICxRra0JdPjL0CFfyn4yd6VKzd80UOKm2F+K2HAQIRADlW+V 2H+llgJVbPoOCsuQF7CGj8d571HUfH2FZMU/Oy83fP4d5xmokIRl17J/z19QuqujfeVeTSUz Qvb3tYt6A62KJN5DDIcmE9f0fag3SqaiVbwfRV1N+5XKtW4NvdgwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgEN MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBl MRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYD VQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUg UGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWls QHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQG EwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMj VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD gY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTl UAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIAC ZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgw BgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3Rl UGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAY BgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2j ZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguC dJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4k sdMdRv9dX2VPMYICUTCCAk0CAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEF6FUDVra3hmcHk892erVzowCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCBsTAYBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAxMTMwNzE5MTNaMCMGCSqG SIb3DQEJBDEWBBQ9zlGJYce34X/8IyRy6EgAlLEx7jBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqG SIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG 9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQC8v2qcFZH5JgyuABkcXX561jd7/kg7sb5eKDZA vLh3cZ6yhM6vaOruHH+1UAM91yIvwqdzEZgq+WZkWYh/zSg/g+rxL9/hDu2Vrwhk1jUpMRi8 rW74TsRhF3dGlbSvbkX2MJJtSJdXbrckBBLl++U1ScUxrpOnr4d3sKb4YyxTYxQW4ZmdiqzZ I7K3v3crT8t0DN++mV8KeJuLHKUwNjjPvNBLWgPAkjX062OqKOl4y2kY0UhSXv33r8pURgUO i5Zn3LvHc4d7uP8iIMmzeyuERQeRLR6NCw4szszDV3nkBelZ3XMW/8Fisdr3ocwVlR1PXi9O Fc8zsabwfhrvHznu --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:27:01 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 96294 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:26:29 -0000 Received: from mail.el.net (68.165.89.91) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:26:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 93724 invoked by uid 1008); 13 Jan 2006 07:27:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:27:01 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:27:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <64147.24.90.33.115.1137137221.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <43C72477.2050902@bueller.ca> References: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> <43C72477.2050902@bueller.ca> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:27:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: spamcontrol patches From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Matt Ferris" Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal thank you for replying.... this is from a mail i got back from them - it wasn't spamcop: 'Your apparent auto-reply contained the entire spam, which caused our spam filter installation to trigger on it.' so it must have been that. the reason i think it contained the whole spam message is that we allow some users to set their own spam preferences and some of them don't. so the spamfilter didn't tag it. the message was an auto reply to an user account that no longer exists but has an autoreply set up to let their customers know about it. and that's the reason the message actually got sent back to the spamtrap. so i'll be looking for a 550 solution and disable autorespond in vpopmail. if somebody has any suggestions please let me know... thanks... > kalin mintchev wrote: >> recently our mail server was listed with an rbl db because the machine >> sends out the autoreplies with the spam message in it. >> on the spamcop site: >> http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html >> >> it says that the spamcontrol patch helps to avoid that situation. the >> thing is i have the patched installed. it's been in place for about 6 >> months maybe. > > Actually it lists the SPAMCONTROL patch as a solution for misdirected > bounces. This works because (configured properly) SPAMCONTROL allows you > to bounce mail destined to nonexistent accounts during the SMTP session. > In your situation, I'm assuming the recipient has an existing account on > the system, therefore mail addressed to the recipient will be accepted > regardless of this feature. > >> can somebody please explain if there is a particular configuration file >> that is needed for the patches in spamcontrol to avoid this situation. >> >> or is there a way to use autorespond without including the original >> message or just stop using autorespond and use a custom 550 message? > > In would venture to guess that the reason you were listed on SpamCop > wasn't because your reply contained the original message, instead it has > to do with the fact that you replied at all. The forged sender's address > was probably one of SpamCop's "secret" honeypot addresses. Because these > addresses aren't published anywhere (as far as I know), they assume that > any messages that are received via these addresses come from spammers. > Thus your reply to the forged honeypot address would make it appear as > though you were a spammer which would result in your listing within > their database. > > So yes, a 550 message would perhaps be a safer way of implementing this > kind of feature, however, I'm can't think of any easy way implenting > this off the top of my head. You may be able to find something along > these lines at www.qmail.org. > > -- > Matt Ferris > matt@bueller.ca > > -- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:45:13 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 21460 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:45:43 -0000 Received: from dns.a-i-p.it (HELO aipnet.it) (212.39.9.100) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 19999 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:45:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO home.morettoni.local) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 88648 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2006 07:45:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:45:13 +0100 From: Luca Morettoni To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c Message-ID: <20060113074512.GA88545@morettoni.net> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> <43C757BA.4060602@over.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C757BA.4060602@over.ru> X-GPG-Key: http://morettoni.net/key/ X-GPG-Fingerprint: D69411BB/C329AED4592319826F12 3036B51E664FD69411BB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:32:51AM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > Too many false positives. I'd LOVE blocking incoming mail from=20 > dialup/adsl network, however, I must accept mail originated from them,=20 > but incoming from legitimate mail servers. I love this too! I filter incoming smtp connection with a private RBL (with dialups and other bad networks), after that in delivery I filter again (and I park suspected spam in a separate box) --=20 Luca Morettoni - http://morettoni.net GUFI staff/core member - http://gufi.org AIP/ITCS member #2589 | FreeSBIE developer Current system: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE, up 2 days, 21 hrs, 16 mins, 13 secs --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIIrgYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIInzCCCJsCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BiUwggLeMIICR6ADAgECAhBehVA1a2t4ZnB5PPdnq1c6MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMGIxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYD VQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNjAxMDkxMTI1 MzFaFw0wNzAxMDkxMTI1MzFaMEQxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIx ITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEmx1Y2FAbW9yZXR0b25pLm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD ggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMIjTLrMYXWCKz7hlFmXXwpRDuHvgM3KsEjirFoosrUBN1SYuDEyLei9 BkCinO/8h78wrwqSngdujRvEQfp7qRLtjEiTKiLDyb4llgYJUs2U9+Vw2bElG+sjdkqQqFJB NG+cfxpv+b1jg8fi4tba7tFkfRm+AxqFt8iy7xmkpJA7W8FNySX4j/y7p8pmCS1FTwPxIRzs 6Qq5Vy0Fa076RMT3ly6IpETMVCDRGSeAsbXnco7MZrrjI+uoL0h45k4/LJutDRncbRMDtc1R 5OMyF4LPCAiOsdr07jYwDbLqUlx08Z7S16FiJcpIVwSHHDOc/+ZaHwPZK11D72PahZUOLhEC AwEAAaMvMC0wHQYDVR0RBBYwFIESbHVjYUBtb3JldHRvbmkubmV0MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAICxRra0JdPjL0CFfyn4yd6VKzd80UOKm2F+K2HAQIRADlW+V 2H+llgJVbPoOCsuQF7CGj8d571HUfH2FZMU/Oy83fP4d5xmokIRl17J/z19QuqujfeVeTSUz Qvb3tYt6A62KJN5DDIcmE9f0fag3SqaiVbwfRV1N+5XKtW4NvdgwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgEN MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBl MRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYD VQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUg UGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWls QHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQG EwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMj VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD gY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTl UAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIAC ZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgw BgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3Rl UGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAY BgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2j ZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguC dJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4k sdMdRv9dX2VPMYICUTCCAk0CAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEF6FUDVra3hmcHk892erVzowCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCBsTAYBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAxMTMwNzQ1MTJaMCMGCSqG SIb3DQEJBDEWBBQjuqodcSsggllSomQ0Kj8ZU6s60TBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqG SIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG 9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBKUVu1ee/Mh89JlKrcgXT5JuQoy9IwNyBdRkzU Jg8AfEo7tg9T0e35buxOaZPCpLCyMQ1CRWjy1/ZW6rhJZpi/FwHxX0u8bHi52qUPPgZeAwMt J9PpSM+AVPVrjwkOmSVN2ddZ8XZtmsb5PZhVQRY3MQcOgprn4aEUw03UhC/ifX4awUipctxm e8Y/KkNX0StleiJpl4He8CEP6dH2DK1GLYRWQ65J1AMIC6c+nGcjgpbgsYJ0k3jYiRY1IaAP L21yhD/ozFzs66de3oqjKG6VDxJHz3zNYGnWE2++NHm+CquNRlSkUDCILy3d+0HKypokn/Ky /gTqhFnh1RQoJxYh --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:34:38 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 10840 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:35:38 -0000 Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (81.228.8.83) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:35:38 -0000 Received: from safari.iki.fi (80.223.105.208) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43C671920003E900 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:34:42 +0100 Received: (qmail 20045 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2006 07:34:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:34:38 +0200 From: Sami Farin To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c Message-ID: <20060113073437.GA31221@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEi8t9RHnE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --liOOAslEi8t9RHnE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:21:07AM +0100, Luca Morettoni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:49:48AM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > > 1. My authorized clients may come from RBL'ed addresses. For instance, = I=20 > > don't want to receive messages from adsl/dialup pools, EXCEPT mail from= =20 > > my clients. >=20 > the new release of qmail-rblchk can do that >=20 > > 2. Quite the same - but for clients of any other mail servers. > > 3. When mail checker scans the mail, it has been already received. >=20 > sure, but when you check mails in local delivery you can store that in > separates folders (insted of reject false positive match) If you got 100000 spams a day, how many hours in a day would you be willing to waste time searching for "false positives" from your "spam folder" without starting to feel "negative"? --=20 --liOOAslEi8t9RHnE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDx1gLMCYCLUwuV18RAr7HAJ9FlP4JxSob8xCziO7R0KAoOGvsUwCgo+Mf 3x9boozcd4mDx0x6boqr5K0= =4309 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEi8t9RHnE-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 07:33:14 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 9502 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:34:02 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO techno.sub.ru) (86@213.247.139.22) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:34:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 59948 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 07:33:32 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO localhost) (213.247.139.22) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:33:32 -0000 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 53174-12; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:33:29 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tarkhil.rostokino.net (HELO ?192.168.1.72?) (tarkhil%sub.ru@85.192.19.9) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:33:29 -0000 Message-ID: <43C757BA.4060602@over.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:33:14 +0300 From: Alex Povolotsky User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Morettoni CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> In-Reply-To: <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.sub.ru Luca Morettoni wrote: >On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:49:48AM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > > >>1. My authorized clients may come from RBL'ed addresses. For instance, I >>don't want to receive messages from adsl/dialup pools, EXCEPT mail from >>my clients. >> >> > >the new release of qmail-rblchk can do that > > > >>2. Quite the same - but for clients of any other mail servers. >>3. When mail checker scans the mail, it has been already received. >> >> > >sure, but when you check mails in local delivery you can store that in >separates folders (insted of reject false positive match) > > > Too many false positives. I'd LOVE blocking incoming mail from dialup/adsl network, however, I must accept mail originated from them, but incoming from legitimate mail servers. Alex. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 08:29:27 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 73609 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 08:29:58 -0000 Received: from riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (mail@62.44.100.74) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 08:29:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 2975 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2006 08:29:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20060113082927.2974.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:29:27 +0200 From: Nikola To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: [UPDATE] qmail-rbl.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi people! Someone ask for white-list-RBL. I added such feature. This program is designed to be small and simple! http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/docs/qmail-rbl.html Enjoy, Nikola From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 08:36:45 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 86372 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 08:37:32 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO techno.sub.ru) (86@213.247.139.22) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 08:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 93803 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 08:37:02 -0000 Received: from webmail.sub.ru (HELO localhost) (213.247.139.22) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 08:37:02 -0000 Received: from unknown ([213.247.139.22]) by localhost (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 84231-13; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:36:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tarkhil.rostokino.net (HELO ?192.168.1.72?) (tarkhil%sub.ru@85.192.19.9) by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 08:36:59 -0000 Message-ID: <43C7669D.2080201@over.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:36:45 +0300 From: Alex Povolotsky User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Morettoni CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Graylisting (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] qmail-rbl.c) References: <20060112224920.2480.qmail@riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg> <43C74DA3.5030109@over.ru> <20060113072106.GB88103@morettoni.net> <43C757BA.4060602@over.ru> <20060113074512.GA88545@morettoni.net> In-Reply-To: <20060113074512.GA88545@morettoni.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.sub.ru Luca Morettoni wrote: >On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:32:51AM +0300, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > > >>Too many false positives. I'd LOVE blocking incoming mail from >>dialup/adsl network, however, I must accept mail originated from them, >>but incoming from legitimate mail servers. >> >> > >I love this too! I filter incoming smtp connection with a private RBL >(with dialups and other bad networks), after that in delivery I filter >again (and I park suspected spam in a separate box) > > Well, I'm doing roughly the same. And I've added graylist to qmail-smtp, and spam volume dropped at least 10 times. Maybe 20. However, I'm tired of patchoverpatching qmail-smtpd, and will write qmail-compartible SMTP proxy with as flexible checking as possible. Alex. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 18:31:26 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 11838 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 18:33:48 -0000 Received: from 64-33-236-101.customer.datatruck.com (HELO dakotasioux.com) (64.33.236.101) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 18:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24188 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Jan 2006 18:31:26 -0000 Received: from mike@dakotasioux.com by mail by uid 1008 with qmail-scanner-1.20st (spamassassin: 3.0.3. Clear:RC:1(192.168.3.3):. Processed in 0.027711 secs); 13 Jan 2006 18:31:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dakotasioux.com) (192.168.3.3) by dakotasioux.com with SMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:31:26 -0600 Received: from 66.128.181.66 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mike@dakotasioux.com) by mail.dakotasioux.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:31:26 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <25443.66.128.181.66.1137177086.squirrel@mail.dakotasioux.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:31:26 -0600 (CST) Subject: djbdns questions From: mike@dakotasioux.com To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal I hope this is the place for this question. This is more a matter of curiosity than anything else - that is I am not trying to solve any problem - djbdns did that. I recently re-implemented djbdns for cacheing only. My question is what name server does this server query? (I had thought it was from the secondary and tertiary nameservers entered in resolv.conf however I am not certain.) From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Fri Jan 13 18:45:53 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 27538 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 18:46:05 -0000 Received: from s010600c0f04a067d.ss.shawcable.net (HELO discworld.dyndns.org) (70.64.40.43) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 18:46:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 16820 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Jan 2006 18:45:54 -0000 X-pymsgauth-token: 00e4a18198fc6a41993718ecf36be5f6b76e2b12 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:45:53 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: djbdns questions Message-ID: <20060113184553.GB16799@discworld.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: dns@list.cr.yp.to References: <25443.66.128.181.66.1137177086.squirrel@mail.dakotasioux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25443.66.128.181.66.1137177086.squirrel@mail.dakotasioux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 mike@dakotasioux.com wrote: > I hope this is the place for this question. Nope. djb maintains a separate list for dns questions. See http://cr.yp.to/lists.html for a reference. MFT set. > I recently re-implemented djbdns for cacheing only. My question is what > name server does this server query? (I had thought it was from the > secondary and tertiary nameservers entered in resolv.conf however I am not > certain.) No, the servers listed in resolv.conf are not used for anything by dnscache. dnscache starts from the root servers you've configured in the "@" file and works down the delegations from there, obeying any overrides in your others "servers" files. See the djbdns documentation if you need details. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html My services include qmail consulting. See http://pyropus.ca/ for details. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 14 08:58:51 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 2178 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 09:02:11 -0000 Received: from po.spectrum.net.in (202.146.192.146) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 09:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 13368 invoked by uid 513); 14 Jan 2006 14:05:22 +0530 Received: from 202.146.192.143 by po.spectrum.net.in (envelope-from , uid 503) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1240. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.069276 secs); 14 Jan 2006 08:35:22 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in via po.spectrum.net.in X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25st (Clear:RC:1(202.146.192.143):. Processed in 0.069276 secs Process 13350) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.70?) (202.146.192.143) by po.spectrum.net.in with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 14:05:21 +0530 Message-ID: <43C8BD4B.7080802@spectrum.net.in> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:28:51 +0530 From: anu bhaskar Reply-To: anu.bhaskar@spectrum.net.in Organization: spectrum softtech solutions User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (X11/20050908) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: qmail cluster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi pls point some tutorials, docs, faq or how to's on qmail high availability clustering thank you -- anu bhaskar From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 14 09:49:23 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 52586 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 09:49:56 -0000 Received: from ns3.blue-emperor.net (qmailr@193.201.201.116) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 09:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19273 invoked by uid 1007); 14 Jan 2006 09:49:25 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 19263, pid: 19265, t: 0.4768s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88/m:35/d:1240 spam: 3.0.3 Received: from host83-217-167-2.dsl.vispa.com (HELO whs1.whs) (hutch@midwales.com@83.217.167.2) by 0 with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2006 09:49:24 -0000 From: Bob Hutchinson To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail cluster Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:49:23 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <43C8BD4B.7080802@spectrum.net.in> In-Reply-To: <43C8BD4B.7080802@spectrum.net.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601140949.23890.hutchlists@midwales.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on ns3.blue-emperor.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 On Saturday 14 Jan 2006 08:58, anu bhaskar wrote: > hi > pls point some tutorials, docs, faq or how to's on qmail high > availability clustering > > thank you for a start: http://shupp.org/maps/ispcluster.html -- ----------------- Bob Hutchinson Midwales dot com ----------------- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 14 13:45:36 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 4337 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 13:47:17 -0000 Received: from mx1.iitkgp.ac.in (HELO iitkgp.ac.in) (202.63.234.244) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 13:47:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14315 invoked by uid 504); 14 Jan 2006 13:46:34 -0000 Received: from Chittaranjan.Mandal@iitkgp.ac.in by acpatra by uid 401 with qmail-scanner-1.20st (clamuko: 20030829. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.022988 secs); 14 Jan 2006 13:46:34 -0000 Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 14 Jan 2006 13:46:12 -0000 Date: 14 Jan 2006 19:15:36 +0530 Message-Id: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> From: "Chittaranjan Mandal" Reply-To: chitta@iitkgp.ac.in To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: TNEF Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IIT Kharagpur Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How does one integrate the tnef un-packer with qmail? -Chitta From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sat Jan 14 17:06:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 9404 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 17:06:39 -0000 Received: from c-65-96-207-76.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (HELO tao.merseine.nu) (65.96.207.76) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 17:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2708 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jan 2006 17:06:10 -0000 From: dsr@tao.merseine.nu Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:06:10 -0500 To: chitta@iitkgp.ac.in Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: TNEF Message-ID: <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> Mail-Followup-To: chitta@iitkgp.ac.in, qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 07:15:36PM +0530, Chittaranjan Mandal wrote: > How does one integrate the tnef un-packer with qmail? I imagine most people use qmail-scanner or a similar package. -dsr- -- What's the best thing you could be doing right now? Why aren't you? From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 15 05:11:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 21152 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 05:12:16 -0000 Received: from mx1.iitkgp.ac.in (HELO iitkgp.ac.in) (202.63.234.244) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 05:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17741 invoked by uid 504); 15 Jan 2006 05:11:40 -0000 Received: from Chittaranjan.Mandal@iitkgp.ac.in by acpatra by uid 401 with qmail-scanner-1.20st (clamuko: 20030829. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.023685 secs); 15 Jan 2006 05:11:40 -0000 Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 15 Jan 2006 05:11:18 -0000 Date: 15 Jan 2006 10:41:10 +0530 Message-Id: <1137301870.3865.7.camel@localhost> From: "Chittaranjan Mandal" Reply-To: chitta@iitkgp.ac.in To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: TNEF In-Reply-To: <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> References: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IIT Kharagpur Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 22:36, dsr@tao.merseine.nu wrote: > > How does one integrate the tnef un-packer with qmail? > > I imagine most people use qmail-scanner or a similar package. Qmail-scanner uses tnef to unpack and scan the mails but, I suppose it leaves the original mail intact. On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 22:18, Cristiano Deana wrote: > > How does one integrate the tnef un-packer with qmail? > > It's not a MTA problem, it's a client problem. Maybe you're interested in > http://tnef.sourceforge.net/ True, I already have tnef installed. But linux MUAs do not seem to handle the problem as yet. It essentially involves re-analyzing the matter within the warped attachment. A qmail solution just might be far more easily achievable. -Chitta From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 15 06:56:43 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 18847 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 06:51:44 -0000 Received: from manaslu.mos.com.np (202.52.255.3) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 06:51:44 -0000 Received: from nuptse. (nuptse.mos.com.np [202.52.255.8]) by manaslu.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id k0F6od61030609 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:35:39 +0545 Received: from langtang.mos.com.np ([202.52.255.9]) by nuptse. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2006011512354005573 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:35:40 -0800 Received: from SwissArmyKnife (mc-gw.mos.com.np [202.52.255.100]) by langtang.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k0F6oaKN007236 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:35:39 +0545 Message-ID: <03b301c619a0$dc5641a0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> From: "SangFroid" To: References: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> <1137301870.3865.7.camel@localhost> Subject: Bad error. qmail-inject died Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:41:43 +0545 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on manaslu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on langtang.mos.com.np X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi, I reinstalled perl as per the instructions in http://freebsd.qmailrocks.org/suidperl.htm as on running /downloads/qmailrocks/qmail-scanner-1.24/contrib/test_installation -doit script, it gave some problems. But still this time, it is saying sh test_installation.sh -doit QMAILQUEUE not set, defaulting to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl for this test... Sending standard test message - no viruses... qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) Bad error. qmail-inject died Also I have set softlimit as per the instructions . May I know where I might have slipped ?? Sang From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 15 07:49:28 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 70399 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 07:44:30 -0000 Received: from manaslu.mos.com.np (202.52.255.3) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 07:44:30 -0000 Received: from nuptse. (nuptse.mos.com.np [202.52.255.8]) by manaslu.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id k0F7hV61000550 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:28:31 +0545 Received: from langtang.mos.com.np ([202.52.255.9]) by nuptse. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2006011513283320171 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:28:33 -0800 Received: from SwissArmyKnife (mc-gw.mos.com.np [202.52.255.100]) by langtang.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k0F7hTKN008390 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:28:31 +0545 Message-ID: <04f001c619a8$402aba60$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> From: "SangFroid" To: References: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> <1137301870.3865.7.camel@localhost> <03b301c619a0$dc5641a0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> Subject: Re: Bad error. qmail-inject died Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:34:28 +0545 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on manaslu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on langtang.mos.com.np X-Virus-Status: Clean ok I managed the problem regarding QMAILQUEUE not set, but still it is giving me the following err msg. sh test_installation.sh -doit Sending standard test message - no viruses... qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) Bad error. qmail-inject died I have reinstalled perl too.... Sang ----- Original Message ----- From: "SangFroid" To: Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:41 PM Subject: Bad error. qmail-inject died > Hi, > I reinstalled perl as per the instructions in > http://freebsd.qmailrocks.org/suidperl.htm as on running > /downloads/qmailrocks/qmail-scanner-1.24/contrib/test_installation -doit > script, it gave some problems. But still this time, it is saying > > > sh test_installation.sh -doit > QMAILQUEUE not set, defaulting to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl for > this test... > > Sending standard test message - no viruses... > qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) > Bad error. qmail-inject died > > > Also I have set softlimit as per the instructions . > > May I know where I might have slipped ?? > > Sang > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Sun Jan 15 08:30:58 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 13644 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 08:25:54 -0000 Received: from manaslu.mos.com.np (202.52.255.3) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 08:25:54 -0000 Received: from nuptse. (nuptse.mos.com.np [202.52.255.8]) by manaslu.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id k0F8Ou61002591 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:09:56 +0545 Received: from langtang.mos.com.np ([202.52.255.9]) by nuptse. (NAVGW 2.5.1.12) with SMTP id M2006011514095803329 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:09:58 -0800 Received: from SwissArmyKnife (mc-gw.mos.com.np [202.52.255.100]) by langtang.mos.com.np (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k0F8OpKN009558 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:09:56 +0545 Message-ID: <055101c619ae$0886e560$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> From: "SangFroid" To: References: <1137246336.2304.2.camel@chitta.cse.iitkgp.ernet.in> <20060114170610.GB1540@tao.merseine.nu> <1137301870.3865.7.camel@localhost> <03b301c619a0$dc5641a0$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> <04f001c619a8$402aba60$7b0aa8c0@SwissArmyKnife> Subject: Re: Bad error. qmail-inject died Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:15:58 +0545 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on manaslu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1241/Sat Jan 14 15:45:03 2006 on langtang.mos.com.np X-Virus-Status: Clean Aah!!!....resolved it... it was problem with perl..it was not present in correct location :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "SangFroid" To: Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:34 PM Subject: Re: Bad error. qmail-inject died > ok I managed the problem regarding QMAILQUEUE not set, but still it is > giving me the following err msg. > > > sh test_installation.sh -doit > > Sending standard test message - no viruses... > qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) > Bad error. qmail-inject died > > > I have reinstalled perl too.... > > Sang > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SangFroid" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:41 PM > Subject: Bad error. qmail-inject died > > > > Hi, > > I reinstalled perl as per the instructions in > > http://freebsd.qmailrocks.org/suidperl.htm as on running > > /downloads/qmailrocks/qmail-scanner-1.24/contrib/test_installation -doit > > script, it gave some problems. But still this time, it is saying > > > > > > sh test_installation.sh -doit > > QMAILQUEUE not set, defaulting to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl > for > > this test... > > > > Sending standard test message - no viruses... > > qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) > > Bad error. qmail-inject died > > > > > > Also I have set softlimit as per the instructions . > > > > May I know where I might have slipped ?? > > > > Sang > > > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 13:52:17 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 63571 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 13:53:10 -0000 Received: from atlantico.estg.ipvc.pt (HELO estgmail.estg.ipvc.pt) (212.13.32.100) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 13:53:10 -0000 Received: from pacifico ([10.0.25.111] RDNS failed) by estgmail.estg.ipvc.pt with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:47:56 +0000 From: "Pedro Costa" To: Subject: Winbind & Qmail Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:52:17 -0000 Message-ID: <001101c61aa4$1199f920$6f19000a@pacifico> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C61AA4.1199F920" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYapBAmQv19lixTSQeOF2LGLgjtbw== X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2006 13:47:56.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[7475B3A0:01C61AA3] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C61AA4.1199F920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi It is possible to integrate winbind an Qmail POP3 to authenticate against a w2k3 server? (With or without vpopmail) What components must be used? THX pc ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C61AA4.1199F920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi 

It is possible to integrate winbind an = Qmail=20 POP3 to authenticate against a w2k3 server?

(With or=20 without vpopmail)

What=20 components must be used?

 

THX

pc

 

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C61AA4.1199F920-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 14:52:16 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 26629 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 14:53:12 -0000 Received: from web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.75) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 14:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 94345 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 14:52:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UCk6KGTyyfaF2QF8GZ1NhabLaJ96R7QB+7tB2FklEyW6Ke7t3xGxtAP5mBEpZZG7GQDOePP3VPjtG1M9yshaneYSiG28AdP8iXAfCz5tH4RYD0bvwLquWbT6QHyy1TS+xTzhJDg6iPW7N0uLzQnazMf2b/FmaAuCg6HYfxcdpJM= ; Message-ID: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.93.170.248] by web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:52:16 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:52:16 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello all, It's working just well enough that I can be fooled for a short time. But the bulk of messages aren't getting through on my server I just converted to FreeBSD from Linux. It is FreeBSD 6.0-release. Trying to resolve this problem, I took out the rbldns stuff, and made changes per G.10 in Life With Qmail. None of this is making any difference. The run file for qmal-smtpd now looks like: cat /var/service/qmail-smtpd/run #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset in echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run exit 1 fi exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 4000000 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 The installation is (now) a netqmail-1.05 with the doublebounce patch, with an attempt to clean up some after the FreeBSD port installation (I moved aside the port-created /var/qmail/bin and re-ran 'make setup check'). The configuration is largely copied over from the old Linux installation. I am seeing nothing unusual in the qmail-smtpd log except a paucity of mail coming through. tcpdump reveals a heavy flow of spam and occasional legitimate mail on port 25 that qmail-smtpd doesn't respond to. Some cron messages from my local network do seem to make it through. Some spam makes it through. Some mail from news sites makes it through. I seem to be able to send from off site. I did receive one e-mail from a friend. Like I said, it's working just well enough to fool. But the volume is way, way down. Help! Thanks! David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 15:34:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 69859 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 15:32:58 -0000 Received: from 70-32-144-53.clspco.adelphia.net (HELO mail.oaksage.dyndns.org) (70.32.144.53) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 15:32:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7706 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Jan 2006 15:34:46 -0000 Received: by localhost (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:34:46 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:34:46 -0700 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 Message-ID: <20060116153446.GA7697@uller> References: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Feldmann Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) Reply-To: Richard Feldmann David Benfell spake thusly on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:52:16AM -0800: > #!/bin/sh > QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` > NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` > MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` > if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z > "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then > echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset > in > echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run > exit 1 > fi > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 4000000 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -x > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ > -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > 2>&1 Hi David, You can always try raising the softlimit, a meg at a time until you see stuff flowing. Are you running any anti-spam or anti-virus software, like clamav or spamassassin? It could be that you're running out of memory on some messages? I've found that if I run spamassassin and clamav, I can't set the softlimit less than 20-21 meg. Regards, Richard -- Did this email or post help you? If so, please rate me at affero: http://rate.affero.net/RhunDraco From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 16:39:04 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 40551 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 16:40:00 -0000 Received: from web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.75) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 16:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 62270 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 16:39:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k96tdIKIh9vN8O7AtCH+Fw4/12qomi4xtC9JqXkDM+/jrcgZAH1y+f0SM3hfZruFCSagI/EnuR0F1XmB7lEPMBWWbIhDOqP6WrsQ18W2VsvH6sqJdfn6uqgvknI2duwQPtkqfbZrvqEctbxy5zHGmTOb2wyP7V0PPqpzmC/GYSQ= ; Message-ID: <20060116163904.62268.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.93.170.248] by web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:39:04 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:39:04 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20060116153446.GA7697@uller> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Richard Feldmann wrote: > You can always try raising the softlimit, a meg at a > time until you see stuff flowing. Okay. I've raised it now to 6MB. We'll see how that goes... > Are you running > any anti-spam or anti-virus software, like clamav or > spamassassin? I run spamassassin but only on messages that have been safely delivered. I figured out that spamassassin has a few too many ways to fail, leading to indefinite deferrals (until failure). I should make some comments about my setup, however. For practical purposes, I have a FreeBSD system which is my primary mail server. It runs packet filtering explicitly to block e-mail on the outside interface because the mail should be getting passed through my OpenBSD router, which runs spamd, using white and black lists from relaydb. And indeed tcpdump is showing ample smtp traffic on the correct interface (to the router). For this demonstration, I already have a 'tail -f /var/log/qmail/current|tai64nlocal' running in background: earth# jobs [1] + running tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal earth# qmailctl stop Stopping qmail... qmail-smtpd qmail-send qmail-pop3d 2006-01-16 08:34:34.746137500 status: exiting earth# qmailctl start Starting qmail earth# 2006-01-16 08:34:39.392168500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 08:34:50.569058500 new msg 989228 2006-01-16 08:34:50.570078500 info msg 989228: bytes 1850 from qp 66305 uid 82 2006-01-16 08:34:50.572074500 starting delivery 1: msg 989228 to local benfell@cybernude.org 2006-01-16 08:34:50.572410500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 08:34:50.580665500 delivery 1: success: did_1+0+0/ 2006-01-16 08:34:50.581220500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 08:34:50.581224500 end msg 989228 vim /var/service/qmail-smtpd/run2006-01-16 08:34:59.988066500 new msg 989678 2006-01-16 08:34:59.988974500 info msg 989678: bytes 1166 from qp 66329 uid 82 2006-01-16 08:34:59.990902500 starting delivery 2: msg 989678 to local benfell@cybernude.org 2006-01-16 08:34:59.991223500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 08:34:59.999185500 delivery 2: success: did_1+0+0/ 2006-01-16 08:34:59.999721500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 08:34:59.999725500 end msg 989678 tcpdump -i rl1 port 25 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on rl1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 08:35:13.489485 IP TYO200.gate.nec.co.jp.54647 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 51296288:51296288(0) win 0 08:35:13.585756 IP 80.120.1.132.11340 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1364977068:1364977068(0) win 0 08:35:13.651529 IP mail.yorkshirewater.co.uk.1300 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2674049564:2674049564(0) win 0 08:35:14.363149 IP mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net.24940 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2090594407:2090594407(0) win 0 08:35:14.881231 IP corona.aitai.ne.jp.56552 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2826476461:2826476461(0) win 0 08:35:15.279112 IP addr16.addr.com.3578 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3876909348:3876909348(0) win 0 08:35:15.807537 IP 58.17.35.110.dbreporter > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 4187760367:4187760367(0) win 0 08:35:16.121049 IP mail.wyg.com.10944 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 794997282:794997282(0) win 0 08:35:16.155415 IP smtp1.wanadoo.co.uk.5290 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 132148450:132148450(0) win 0 08:35:17.587373 IP loki.regasia.com.1970 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1316052049:1316052049(0) win 0 08:35:17.931821 IP ns2.ns2.de.58989 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 800962074:800962074(0) win 0 08:35:18.188648 IP ip64-48-254-155.z254-48-64.customer.algx.net.3353 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2411677260:2411677260(0) win 0 08:35:18.307275 IP 67.69.112.226.40737 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 71692329:71692329(0) win 0 08:35:18.592799 IP d01gw01.mi8.com.rgtp > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3933437573:3933437573(0) win 0 08:35:19.710716 IP rrcs-mta-01.hrndva.rr.com.49674 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1696819229:1696819229(0) win 0 08:35:20.039666 IP 84.237.143.16.docstor > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3546764088:3546764088(0) win 0 08:35:21.251245 IP 12.16.44.214.7402 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3768057875:3768057875(0) ack 835703799 win 0 08:35:21.251298 IP mail.greyinteractive.com.24351 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 1465055527:1465055527(0) ack 237135419 win 0 08:35:21.251308 IP host217-37-27-245.in-addr.btopenworld.com.64797 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 331632997:331632997(0) ack 717326931 win 0 08:35:21.251358 IP sv4.phoenisys.ne.jp.33347 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3046470715:3046470715(0) ack 4083370394 win 0 08:35:21.251368 IP ns-1.netart.cz.58255 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 4235043336:4235043336(0) ack 3293612986 win 0 08:35:21.251425 IP corona.aitai.ne.jp.55298 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 2832002869:2832002869(0) ack 208297910 win 0 08:35:21.251430 IP firewall.abgraphics.com.2063 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 371475769:371475769(0) ack 1263661285 win 0 08:35:21.251476 IP lists.tnr.com.39265 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 99513732:99513732(0) ack 466555999 win 0 08:35:21.251485 IP hccs.europe.hcch.com.26062 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3381420792:3381420792(0) ack 856550558 win 0 08:35:21.251530 IP 70-88-245-41-ma-nh-me-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net.65153 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3596830167:3596830167(0) ack 3542973082 win 0 ^C08:35:21.251541 IP lsh139.siteprotect.com.55849 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 4275254658:4275254658(0) ack 2488791578 win 0 27 packets captured 84 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel earth# As you can see, qmail-smtpd has responded to only two messages. And I've found no way to predict which messages it will respond to. I really just know that it responds to some. > It could be that you're running out of > memory on some messages? Would this not produce some sort of error in the log? > > I've found that if I run spamassassin and clamav, I > can't set the softlimit less than 20-21 meg. I've certainly seen cases where operating system differences affect resource requirements with DJB's software in the past. And I can't rule it out here. Thanks! David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 15:25:47 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 62971 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 15:26:19 -0000 Received: from memoryhole.net (207.178.113.208) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 15:26:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14034 invoked by uid 64020); 16 Jan 2006 15:25:34 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=FjRDB9DjBc5bfk3cQMNLP7LcTI7IBVs+tkmUz2JPufmXGR5qm1AvF4eJ1HeuzTeIKJbl9+pVoeZVnTe9ngE6NHI7yaJCdiqlb7wKZ3KKe7Q013k5cadJXAFiAewBE2f6flMuFfufYoh52HrS/vTKzPoWBtYQk/9cdM9LcWxkJpM= ; Received: from c-67-177-180-177.hsd1.in.comcast.net (HELO tunican.local) (kyle@67.177.180.177) by memoryhole.net with ESMTPA; 16 Jan 2006 15:25:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:25:47 -0500 From: Kyle Wheeler To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Winbind & Qmail Message-ID: <20060116152547.GG7788@tunican.local> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <001101c61aa4$1199f920$6f19000a@pacifico> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001101c61aa4$1199f920$6f19000a@pacifico> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, January 16 at 01:52 PM, quoth Pedro Costa: >Hi=20 > >It is possible to integrate winbind an Qmail POP3 to authenticate against a >w2k3 server? Probably. Since winbind works as a PAM backend, just download and=20 configure one of the PAM-based checkpassword implementations. ~Kyle --=20 In any conversation where only one side may be argued, we instinctively=20 assume that those who publicly defend the official position are=20 motivated by ideology and not by an interest in truth. The outlawed=20 position is then assumed to be true, and wins by default. -- Andrew Hamilton SJ --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQFDy7r7BkIOoMqOI14RAsBvAKDubjYlrGOT+i5SWRfPN15bdKnAQwCfbkIs dRhdGjJUARn+hCYLul3vAFs= =N2u4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 18:38:40 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66709 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 18:39:36 -0000 Received: from web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.67) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 18:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 66877 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 18:38:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WRFaL7EkFMXGQqWXhZF2QrAMcsnHZU8PL068VA8qIu4PlPWCCWHLPbRY+OgyXlqQtF5ao+6ypLAUFpCzuFoDrH6cMftBYLfZccknd4TdrSV+vyatlAwlfqRZbfUx6h5gEFiR5Yz1/CPG2l7JE5TYfOLbTtfrdY6BdTGEapQV2F0= ; Message-ID: <20060116183840.66875.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.198.137.10] by web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:38:40 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:38:40 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: Richard Feldmann , qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20060116153446.GA7697@uller> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Richard Feldmann wrote: > You can always try raising the softlimit, a meg at a > time until you see stuff flowing. No luck. The limit is now at 20MB with no discernable change. Any other ideas? Thanks! David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 18:49:25 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 80216 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 18:50:22 -0000 Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (81.228.11.159) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 18:50:22 -0000 Received: from safari.iki.fi (80.223.105.208) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43CB56B2000414C9 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:49:26 +0100 Received: (qmail 32230 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 18:49:25 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:49:25 +0200 From: Sami Farin To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 Message-ID: <20060116184925.GG9909@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060116153446.GA7697@uller> <20060116183840.66875.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116183840.66875.qmail@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:38:40AM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > > > --- Richard Feldmann wrote: > > > You can always try raising the softlimit, a meg at a > > time until you see stuff flowing. > > No luck. The limit is now at 20MB with no discernable > change. Any other ideas? What's the tcpserver concurrency limit? Make it bigger. And try also tcpserver -b 1000. -- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 18:50:08 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 80512 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 18:50:42 -0000 Received: from asbak.coding-slaves.com (qmailr@82.93.81.131) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 18:50:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26283 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 18:50:08 -0000 Received: from grolsch.home.lan (HELO ?10.10.10.2?) (10.10.10.2) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 18:50:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43CBEAE0.4070303@asbak.coding-slaves.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:50:08 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 References: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/16/2006 3:52 PM +0100, David Benfell wrote: > cat /var/service/qmail-smtpd/run > #!/bin/sh > QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` > NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` > MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` > if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z > "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then > echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset > in > echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run > exit 1 > fi > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 4000000 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -x > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ > -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > 2>&1 > Hi David, What's the value of /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming Is there any kind of ratelimiter (iptables) working on the box or in front of the box ? Regards, Niek Baakman From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 20:11:18 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 69731 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 20:12:14 -0000 Received: from web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.65) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 20:12:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 48192 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 20:11:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=N7CKuCxLDxh1x64T43bPfSgLs6zlEv71KGtDSY41udlBoGbNggwc1qvH0B6c0qUPwr3G5WBOz8Cs07TfTdCQZLY52Y8fMKk/hE4FZMS4tg8nf90BQBHDZFuIiWdebvW2ZK58jQHW+g4SMx3ZRRfQu5Cb22F+0I3dl8D9Iu31CzU= ; Message-ID: <20060116201118.48190.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.198.146.101] by web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:11:18 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:11:18 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20060116184925.GG9909@m.safari.iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Sami Farin wrote: > What's the tcpserver concurrency limit? Make it > bigger. It was 20. I've now raised it to 50. The machine has a 1.6G processor so I'm assuming I can raise it more. > And try also tcpserver -b 1000. Done. earth# qmailctl stop Stopping qmail... qmail-smtpd qmail-send qmail-pop3d earth# tail -f /var/log/qmail/current|tai64nlocal 2006-01-16 11:34:50.173042500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 11:34:50.173045500 end msg 989228 2006-01-16 11:35:00.965412500 new msg 989639 2006-01-16 11:35:00.966305500 info msg 989639: bytes 1167 from qp 88045 uid 82 2006-01-16 11:35:00.968381500 starting delivery 6: msg 989639 to local benfell@cybernude.org 2006-01-16 11:35:00.968697500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 11:35:00.976564500 delivery 6: success: did_1+0+0/ 2006-01-16 11:35:00.977086500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2006-01-16 11:35:00.977090500 end msg 989639 2006-01-16 12:07:15.453988500 status: exiting ^Z zsh: suspended tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal earth# bg [1] + continued tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal earth# cat /var/service/qmail-smtpd/run #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset in echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run exit 1 fi exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 20000000 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -b 1000 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 earth# qmailctl start Starting qmail earth# 2006-01-16 12:08:38.684760500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Apparently, no luck. Thanks! David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 20:44:16 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 6812 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 20:45:11 -0000 Received: from asbak.coding-slaves.com (qmailr@82.93.81.131) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 20:45:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26757 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 20:44:16 -0000 Received: from grolsch.home.lan (HELO ?10.10.10.2?) (10.10.10.2) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 20:44:16 -0000 Message-ID: <43CC05A0.9030401@asbak.coding-slaves.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:44:16 +0100 From: Niek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail List Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 References: <20060116201118.48190.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060116201118.48190.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/16/2006 9:11 PM +0100, David Benfell wrote: > earth# qmailctl stop > Stopping qmail... > qmail-smtpd > qmail-send > qmail-pop3d > earth# tail -f /var/log/qmail/current|tai64nlocal > 2006-01-16 11:34:50.173042500 status: local 0/10 > remote 0/20 > 2006-01-16 11:34:50.173045500 end msg 989228 > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.965412500 new msg 989639 > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.966305500 info msg 989639: bytes > 1167 from qp 88045 uid 82 > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.968381500 starting delivery 6: msg > 989639 to local benfell@cybernude.org > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.968697500 status: local 1/10 > remote 0/20 > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.976564500 delivery 6: success: > did_1+0+0/ > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.977086500 status: local 0/10 > remote 0/20 > 2006-01-16 11:35:00.977090500 end msg 989639 > 2006-01-16 12:07:15.453988500 status: exiting > ^Z > zsh: suspended tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | > tai64nlocal > earth# bg > [1] + continued tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | > tai64nlocal > earth# cat /var/service/qmail-smtpd/run > #!/bin/sh > QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` > NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` > MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` > if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z > "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then > echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset > in > echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run > exit 1 > fi > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 20000000 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -b 1000 > -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ > -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > 2>&1 > earth# qmailctl start > Starting qmail > earth# 2006-01-16 12:08:38.684760500 status: local > 0/10 remote 0/20 > > Apparently, no luck. Thanks! > > David Benfell > white_line_fever@yahoo.com Eer, you stop qmail, so no new mail comes in. Then you tail -f the qmail-send log, which probably isn't doing much as no new mail is coming in. Then you start qmail again. I'd say fire up 2 terminals. On one tail -f the qmail/current file and on the other tail -f the qmail/smtpd/current file. qmail/smtpd/current records connections to port 25, and qmail/current records local and remote mail deliveries. Good luck, Niek Baakman From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 21:03:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 30468 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 21:04:44 -0000 Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (81.228.8.164) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 21:04:44 -0000 Received: from safari.iki.fi (80.223.105.208) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43CB4587000550FF for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:03:48 +0100 Received: (qmail 2234 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 21:03:46 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:03:46 +0200 From: Sami Farin To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 Message-ID: <20060116210345.GI9909@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060116184925.GG9909@m.safari.iki.fi> <20060116201118.48190.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaHlL+5n6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116201118.48190.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --OgqxwSJOaHlL+5n6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:11:18PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >=20 >=20 > --- Sami Farin wrote: >=20 > > What's the tcpserver concurrency limit? Make it > > bigger. >=20 > It was 20. I've now raised it to 50. The machine has > a 1.6G processor so I'm assuming I can raise it more. Hz-value of CPU is irrelevant, unless you run some brainless CPU hogs on each qmail-smtpd invocation. Measure max memory usage per one qmail-smtpd invocation, then divide amount of RAM (minus some extra for OS etc.) by mem used by qmail-smtpd.=20 That's your tcpserver concurrency limit (or near the optimal). I believe. And like Niek said, show the correct logs. --=20 --OgqxwSJOaHlL+5n6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDzAotMCYCLUwuV18RAphhAKDV3GXZxtelQgg6kA06Ne86KaJy2gCfUpMD tpg0N59/Tx4OoqSkhy58Xp4= =PLip -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaHlL+5n6-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 20:20:53 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 79689 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 20:21:23 -0000 Received: from mail.citytel.net (209.145.111.46) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 20:21:23 -0000 Received: from pop.citytel.net (pop.citytel.net [204.244.98.50]) by mail.citytel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C0167EC3 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Woodworth To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Same email coming through multiple times. Message-ID: <20060116120818.X79614@pop.citytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Have somewhat of a problem people are complaining about. A person sends one email, yet the recipient will recieve that same message up to 10 times. When the person sends an email, they get a timeout from their mail client saying it could not contact the mailserver, yet their mail went out and gets delivered to the recipient multiple times. This happens with OE, Outlook and Incredimail as far as I can tell. I can see in the log that the mail goes out many times. This is happening to quite a few people, as well there have been a few cases (and I verified this once myself) that someone sending mail from remote (in this case a Gmail account) to a local recip, where the local recip got the mail 6 times. This is happening to too many people to be an isolated instance of one person clicking on send/recieve a bunch of times. Anyone seen this before? Any fix? Thanks, Keith. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 21:30:37 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66063 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 21:31:33 -0000 Received: from web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.76) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 21:31:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 30219 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 21:30:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=h++UDXMds9P9H+cvuwfu5iYNqrZcF7FvI/Ln9drknWm2K6DbKQQE1weVaG50SmE1Fa7C5F3K59B8WzKogF/1YePrEBv/oLQEQKpSuBMQVfSFmqmz+enZwBnuyv155GwPh9YERbPeGVgXVFUzECWh9MEs6haUpi87u2+aeR/tG/4= ; Message-ID: <20060116213037.30217.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.199.165.116] by web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:30:37 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:30:37 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <20060116210345.GI9909@m.safari.iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Sami Farin wrote: > And like Niek said, show the correct logs. Ouch. That was truly brainless of me. I'm less familiar with this log and don't really know what to look for. What I do see are connections from 192.168.19.1 -- the OpenBSD router: 2006-01-16 09:34:50.068849500 tcpserver: end 73492 status 0 2006-01-16 09:34:50.068950500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 09:34:59.478310500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 09:34:59.478698500 tcpserver: pid 73515 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 09:34:59.478857500 tcpserver: ok 73515 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::40402 2006-01-16 09:34:59.487208500 tcpserver: end 73515 status 0 2006-01-16 09:34:59.487275500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 09:52:12.087613500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 10:25:10.195664500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479306500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479705500 tcpserver: pid 80844 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479860500 tcpserver: ok 80844 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::26533 2006-01-16 10:34:49.586527500 tcpserver: end 80844 status 0 2006-01-16 10:34:49.586710500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 10:35:00.006707500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 10:35:00.007076500 tcpserver: pid 80870 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 10:35:00.007234500 tcpserver: ok 80870 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::3291 2006-01-16 10:35:00.014917500 tcpserver: end 80870 status 0 2006-01-16 10:35:00.015083500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 11:30:36.135013500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 11:30:36.135382500 tcpserver: pid 87498 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 11:30:36.135536500 tcpserver: ok 87498 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::47578 2006-01-16 11:30:36.143980500 tcpserver: end 87498 status 0 2006-01-16 11:30:36.144052500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 11:30:36.343131500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 11:30:36.343507500 tcpserver: pid 87503 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 11:30:36.343702500 tcpserver: ok 87503 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::21960 2006-01-16 11:30:36.352489500 tcpserver: end 87503 status 0 2006-01-16 11:30:36.352562500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 11:34:50.054323500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 11:34:50.055358500 tcpserver: pid 88015 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 11:34:50.055522500 tcpserver: ok 88015 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::32156 2006-01-16 11:34:50.161619500 tcpserver: end 88015 status 0 2006-01-16 11:34:50.161693500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 11:35:00.957634500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2006-01-16 11:35:00.958002500 tcpserver: pid 88044 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 11:35:00.958157500 tcpserver: ok 88044 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::15908 2006-01-16 11:35:00.965853500 tcpserver: end 88044 status 0 2006-01-16 11:35:00.966019500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2006-01-16 12:08:38.693932500 tcpserver: status: 0/50 2006-01-16 12:34:50.036651500 tcpserver: status: 1/50 2006-01-16 12:34:50.037042500 tcpserver: pid 95315 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 12:34:50.037194500 tcpserver: ok 95315 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::8251 2006-01-16 12:34:50.143702500 tcpserver: end 95315 status 0 2006-01-16 12:34:50.143779500 tcpserver: status: 0/50 2006-01-16 12:35:00.088316500 tcpserver: status: 1/50 2006-01-16 12:35:00.088702500 tcpserver: pid 95338 from 192.168.19.1 2006-01-16 12:35:00.088858500 tcpserver: ok 95338 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::29128 2006-01-16 12:35:00.100852500 tcpserver: end 95338 status 0 2006-01-16 12:35:00.104302500 tcpserver: status: 0/50 earth# David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 22:00:37 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 790 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 22:01:35 -0000 Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (81.228.11.98) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 22:01:35 -0000 Received: from safari.iki.fi (80.223.105.208) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43CB53AF00054C64 for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:00:40 +0100 Received: (qmail 3109 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 22:00:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:37 +0200 From: Sami Farin To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 Message-ID: <20060116220037.GK9909@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to References: <20060116210345.GI9909@m.safari.iki.fi> <20060116213037.30217.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rz5pIUxbD5vNYLRc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116213037.30217.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 --rz5pIUxbD5vNYLRc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:30:37PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >=20 >=20 > --- Sami Farin wrote: >=20 > > And like Niek said, show the correct logs. >=20 > Ouch. That was truly brainless of me. I'm less > familiar with this log and don't really know what to > look for. What I do see are connections from > 192.168.19.1 -- the OpenBSD router: >=20 =2E.. > 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479306500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 > 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479705500 tcpserver: pid 80844 > from 192.168.19.1 > 2006-01-16 10:34:49.479860500 tcpserver: ok 80844 > 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::26533 > 2006-01-16 10:34:49.586527500 tcpserver: end 80844 > status 0 > 2006-01-16 10:34:49.586710500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 > 2006-01-16 10:35:00.006707500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 > 2006-01-16 10:35:00.007076500 tcpserver: pid 80870 > from 192.168.19.1 > 2006-01-16 10:35:00.007234500 tcpserver: ok 80870 > 0:192.168.19.243:25 :192.168.19.1::3291 > 2006-01-16 10:35:00.014917500 tcpserver: end 80870 > status 0 > 2006-01-16 10:35:00.015083500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 > 2006-01-16 11:30:36.135013500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 Maybe you should recheck openbsd configuration. It seems to deliver only one email per hour to qmail. Maybe you have enabled greylist feature in openbsd spamd. If you disable that, qmail might get to see a bit more emails. Or configure timeouts, or something... --=20 --rz5pIUxbD5vNYLRc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDzBeAMCYCLUwuV18RAjeqAKDFAwdyTnylkwl8Lq3SKT2JfnCU7ACgkhp6 sdYwUgePf/qhI7TIcD6ECVg= =6ye8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rz5pIUxbD5vNYLRc-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 21:41:34 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 77855 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 21:42:32 -0000 Received: from smtp.gfn.org (HELO gfn.org) (205.145.130.34) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 21:42:32 -0000 X-Delivered-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: from gfn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0GLfY25028512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:41:34 -0500 Received: (from swgsh@localhost) by gfn.org (8.12.8/8.12.9/Submit) id k0GLfYRF028511; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:41:34 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gfn.org: swgsh set sender to sgifford@suspectclass.com using -f To: Keith Woodworth Cc: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Same email coming through multiple times. References: <20060116120818.X79614@pop.citytel.net> From: Scott Gifford Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:41:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060116120818.X79614@pop.citytel.net> (Keith Woodworth's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:20:53 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 X-Scanned-By: milter-date/0.6.73 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:41:34 -0500 X-Scanned-By: milter-gris/0.3.18 (gfn.org [205.145.130.34]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:41:34 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO Keith Woodworth writes: > Have somewhat of a problem people are complaining about. > > A person sends one email, yet the recipient will recieve that same message > up to 10 times. > > When the person sends an email, they get a timeout from their mail client > saying it could not contact the mailserver, yet their mail went out and > gets delivered to the recipient multiple times. This happens with OE, > Outlook and Incredimail as far as I can tell. It sounds like a mail server is timing out somewhere. There's a time period in SMTP, between sending the DATA command and receiving a response, where it's impossible to know whether the message has been succesfully sent. If a mail server does something slow between the DATA command and sending its response (like scan for viruses or spam on a busy server), an SMTP client may time out waiting for the DATA response, and decide to re-send the message. In the meantime, the server may have finished with the message and delivered it before noticing that the client has gone away. If your server is the SMTP client in this scenario, increase your timeouts. If it's the SMTP server, speed up your mail processing. Either way, your logs should give more details. Good luck! ----Scott. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 22:36:56 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 43801 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 22:37:26 -0000 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (64.233.184.205) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 22:37:26 -0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so1209706wra for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:36:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LJjL9qP7UQ0lp/Bwngaprj3uI+v0/CG1bkYd9Pea14cAfYqJ6+BXjNes891QXHlLmyS6sssjrAaaseB9jpjRfi9G1K7UfAKC+YjIiErz1kxRf7nrH32dIca21leW5CLLuLfBMUNk+13riwrzd4F26z6n6fnhDRr+BFenVkptAlQ= Received: by 10.54.143.1 with SMTP id q1mr4904778wrd; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.123.4 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:36:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:36:56 +0100 From: Cristiano Deana To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 In-Reply-To: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060116145216.94343.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 2006/1/16, David Benfell : > The installation is (now) a netqmail-1.05 with the > doublebounce patch, with an attempt to clean up some > after the FreeBSD port installation (I moved aside the > port-created /var/qmail/bin and re-ran 'make setup > check'). The configuration is largely copied over > from the old Linux installation. Did you use a /var/qmail/queue installed from ports with netqmail? If either qmail ports or netqmail was installed with big_todo_patch and the other was'nt you got these problems. Deinstall your(s) qmail DELETE your /var/qmail and use ONLY qmail ports, it works fine. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 23:14:20 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 85568 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 23:15:16 -0000 Received: from web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.71) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 23:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 90821 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 23:14:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2TnApr8fqEXEAP3jWtW0k4Fggk3WLev2mxl2/NESF5Ed8OvJEbLHBISxSWfvA3uxHYswssI7BWlAhhBFmi65hOnLgzL19EmJGL/NN9syJYnAuu3YJOMw53dKYqQgYvEFdYI5HO24lcE3a2z6JwACCY0bKh8YPYxaCN6JmNpmMyA= ; Message-ID: <20060116231420.90819.qmail@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.199.165.116] by web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:14:20 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:14:20 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: Cristiano Deana , qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Cristiano Deana wrote: > 2006/1/16, David Benfell > : > > > The installation is (now) a netqmail-1.05 with the > > doublebounce patch, with an attempt to clean up > some > > after the FreeBSD port installation (I moved aside > the > > port-created /var/qmail/bin and re-ran 'make setup > > check'). The configuration is largely copied over > > from the old Linux installation. > > Did you use a /var/qmail/queue installed from ports > with netqmail? > If either qmail ports or netqmail was installed with > big_todo_patch > and the other was'nt you got these problems. I have never selected the big_todo patch. To be honest, I don't understand what it is for. Would a queue problem prevent SMTP traffic from connecting without any entry at all in the qmail-smtpd log? > > Deinstall your(s) qmail DELETE your /var/qmail and > use ONLY qmail > ports, it works fine. Perhaps for you. This is the way I started, just copying in my old control directory. It didn't work. And in fact I almost immediately had a problem with 23 messages stuck in the queue but not pre-processed. The only solution I could find with Google was to delete the queue, losing those 23 messages, whatever they were, and recreate it with 'make setup check' from the build directory in the port. And it still wasn't working. I also observe that the qmail ports do not set qmail up as per Life With Qmail, rely on the syslog facility for logging, and indeed appear intended to run under (gasp) inetd. I do, however, appreciate the fact that the port pointed out the existence of the doublebounce-trim patch. I'm glad it all works for you. My experience is different. There are a lot of things I like about FreeBSD. I especially like the ease of updating the software and I appreciate the intent of the ports system. That's why I chose to blow away the Linux installation and switch to FreeBSD. But my experience is that it really seems not to get along with some of DJB's software well. I had to move my local network DNS services to the OpenBSD router because even though I had allocated separate IP addresses, subsequent instances of anything djbdns related (including rbldns) after the initial tinydns (for the outside world) and dnscache insisted that it could not bind to the UDP port. It just wouldn't work on the FreeBSD system. But I had no trouble when I moved the services onto the OpenBSD router. And the way things are going, I'm going to have to move my mail service to the OpenBSD router as well. While that system has some spare capacity, my security design does not call for that system to be opened up to users. David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 23:35:56 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 9360 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 23:36:26 -0000 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (64.233.184.193) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 23:36:26 -0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so1218280wra for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:35:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GlQ28WSPDWzOOAcMVhiiuetb2DMK2e49onYFNXKX/liwsyMif5TSrD71o+Ea1lvJDPJkCN7DSDlD/5DIkARHEUe7/QXTwYiKuZL+9IhcCu2b2luypcpvziq2GV0xcIQxUV8lDEQ6OJ5PFsxOzKa4kO2/O1t4lJwK2rUy7JtU6/Q= Received: by 10.54.98.19 with SMTP id v19mr5465309wrb; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.123.4 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:35:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:35:56 +0100 From: Cristiano Deana To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 In-Reply-To: <20060116231420.90819.qmail@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060116231420.90819.qmail@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 2006/1/17, David Benfell : > I also observe that the qmail ports do not set qmail > up as per Life With Qmail, rely on the syslog facility > for logging, No. That's "splogger" used by qmail.sh. You can choose to not install it (ports option) and use daemontools (as i do) or modify it. > and indeed appear intended to run under > (gasp) inetd. Absolutetly NOT. > I'm glad it all works for you. My experience is > different. Can't be different, same operating system, same MTA. :) > But my experience is that it really seems not to get > along with some of DJB's software well. I had to move > my local network DNS services to the OpenBSD router > because even though I had allocated separate IP > addresses, subsequent instances of anything djbdns > related (including rbldns) after the initial tinydns > (for the outside world) and dnscache insisted that it > could not bind to the UDP port. It just wouldn't work > on the FreeBSD system. Oh, please!! -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Mon Jan 16 20:18:23 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 77407 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 20:19:19 -0000 Received: from web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com (68.142.207.74) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 20:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5660 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jan 2006 20:18:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IfxzfIVVyKSvPVeg0U9/H0kT0hA1F42IuhdSK7Ha5shRTEuh91P7SUsZX8LfSsvdd0fMmm3QmG3q2Kg2ioDi9+gAk8WT3qtlBd+AsqNeY52j7AxZdTDBxhzrs9Mza2ry/4P/8NQdfZNh0xgtFY1cKvXa3CbGv5lnfMBBZh3NAW0= ; Message-ID: <20060116201823.5658.qmail@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.198.146.101] by web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:18:23 PST Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:18:23 -0800 (PST) From: David Benfell Reply-To: benfell@greybeard95a.com Subject: Re: qmail-smtpd mostly unresponsive on FreeBSD 6.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to In-Reply-To: <43CBEAE0.4070303@asbak.coding-slaves.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Niek wrote: > On 1/16/2006 3:52 PM +0100, David Benfell wrote: > What's the value of > /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming It was 20. I've raised it to 50. > Is there any kind of ratelimiter (iptables) working > on the box or in front of > the box ? I have pf running on both the FreeBSD system this is on, and on the OpenBSD system I use as a router. Neither is configured to do any rate limiting. On the FreeBSD box I have pf configured only to prevent smtp traffic from the outside, since I want it to come in via the router. And traffic does indeed seem to be coming in this way: earth# qmailctl start Starting qmail earth# 2006-01-16 12:08:38.684760500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 tcpdump -i rl1 port 25 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on rl1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 12:15:24.078978 IP miramanee.icarz.com.61945 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3257812926:3257812926(0) win 0 12:15:24.607539 IP 65.104.77.110.ptr.us.xo.net.54876 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 75346930:75346930(0) win 0 12:15:26.035495 IP uslec-66-255-71-114.cust.uslec.net.12382 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 231033814:231033814(0) win 0 12:15:26.090848 IP ghsmail1.fonterra.com.2388 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3366602415:3366602415(0) win 0 12:15:26.312247 IP fep34.mail.dk.53793 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3404207534:3404207534(0) win 0 12:15:27.253134 IP opal.hknet.com.uaiact > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2801266933:2801266933(0) win 0 12:15:27.363964 IP ironmail2.saralee.net.gridgen-elmd > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1103958429:1103958429(0) win 0 12:15:27.520786 IP mail.beas.de.3241 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3032266145:3032266145(0) win 0 12:15:27.932600 IP mail.ebttikar.com.23988 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 30242711:30242711(0) win 0 12:15:28.531284 IP mx2.freebsd.org.22234 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1231085722:1231085722(0) win 0 12:15:28.551489 IP mx2.freebsd.org.23497 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2599850675:2599850675(0) win 0 12:15:28.571810 IP mx2.freebsd.org.26023 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2359369836:2359369836(0) win 0 12:15:28.576768 IP mx2.freebsd.org.20752 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1655354628:1655354628(0) win 0 12:15:28.612029 IP mx2.freebsd.org.25961 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 2730706333:2730706333(0) win 0 12:15:29.024550 IP mailgw3a.lmco.com.47650 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 1059689307:1059689307(0) win 0 12:15:29.110341 IP fall-pradero.atl.sa.earthlink.net.52697 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 624002375:624002375(0) win 0 12:15:30.725542 IP mail.pshouston.com.33710 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: S 3026039152:3026039152(0) win 0 12:15:30.919287 IP ein.kiva.net.51856 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3187400729:3187400729(0) ack 1770554553 win 0 12:15:30.919309 IP exchange.solidcadcam.com.36268 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 3271966276:3271966276(0) ack 518282843 win 0 12:15:30.919351 IP vs2.vdn.pwd.ne.jp.55836 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 531040945:531040945(0) ack 4258885610 win 0 12:15:30.919357 IP lsh141.siteprotect.com.60523 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 1643380037:1643380037(0) ack 2109119820 win 0 ^C12:15:30.919404 IP 211.95.124.1.49539 > earth.cybernude.org.smtp: R 2859857145:2859857145(0) ack 4284903764 win 0 22 packets captured 308 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel earth# By the way, I keep forgetting to mention, this is earth.cybernude.org and the router is lupin.cybernude.org Thanks! David Benfell white_line_fever@yahoo.com From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 04:11:46 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 2481 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 04:12:23 -0000 Received: from zippy.jms1.net (HELO a.mx.jms1.net) (209.114.200.128) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 04:12:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22885 invoked by uid 172); 16 Jan 2006 23:11:53 -0500 Received: from 65.33.160.197 by zippy.jms1.net (envelope-from , uid 162) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88/1243. Clear:RC:0(65.33.160.197):. Processed in 0.05934 secs); 17 Jan 2006 04:11:53 -0000 Received: from 197.160.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.69.23?) (jms1@jms1.net@65.33.160.197) by a.mx.jms1.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 23:11:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <57614.68.165.89.78.1137112706.squirrel@mail.el.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-18-250116954" Message-Id: <8F987A22-EF30-47F7-A48C-DB31B9CCC285@jms1.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Simpson Subject: Re: spamcontrol patches Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:11:46 -0500 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-18-250116954 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 2006-01-12, at 1938, kalin mintchev wrote: > > recently our mail server was listed with an rbl db because the machine > sends out the autoreplies with the spam message in it. > on the spamcop site: > http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html > > it says that the spamcontrol patch helps to avoid that situation. the > thing is i have the patched installed. it's been in place for about 6 > months maybe. > > the listing in the rbl happened 2 weeks ago. > > can somebody please explain if there is a particular configuration > file > that is needed for the patches in spamcontrol to avoid this situation. configure your autoresponder to not include the text of whatever message it's responding to. this should cause spamcop to not consider your message to be spam, AND it makes your autoresponder useless for spamming purposes. also read RFC 3834, sections 3.1.5 and 3.1.7, and make sure your autoresponder's output includes one or both of the recommended headers. this is a standardized mechanism by which auto-reporting honeypots (such as my own "delete.net" honeypot) can tell which messages are legitimate (if misguided) autoresponder output, and which ones are spam. i have also found SPF to be a valuable (although not perfect) tool for filtering incoming mail. my servers use the SPF patch with SPFBEHAVIOR=3, which means that all messages are checked and tagged, and any messages where the test returns HARD_FAIL (i.e. the message claims to be "MAIL FROM" a given domain, but that domain's SPF record does not list the sending IP, and also contains "-all", which means "and no others") then the message is refused. > or is there a way to use autorespond without including the original > message or just stop using autorespond and use a custom 550 message? that depends on the autoresponder software you're using. -------------------------------------------------- | John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/ | -------------------------------------------------- | Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX | | pretty than it is to make Windows secure. | -------------------------------------------------- --Apple-Mail-18-250116954 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDzG6HEB9RczMG/PsRAg6bAJ9Q6IsCSpMcRtuXNMfKld1LotY1/wCgqpt7 S9tyH/llFVh4yJu1e4WgUxE= =lI4p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-18-250116954-- From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 19:18:45 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 66769 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 19:19:38 -0000 Received: from mail.microlinkdenver.com (69.25.214.14) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 19:19:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26246 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 19:19:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 19:19:38 -0000 Message-ID: <43CD4315.6030406@t10.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:18:45 -0700 From: Eric User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Confusing Headers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Can someone help me decipher the following email header. I'm trying to figure out which one to block but I see google's and Verizon's. Thanks for any help. - Eric ============ Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 2713, pid: 2714, t: 0.3547s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:35/d:1235 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pobox1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net) (72.66.166.145) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 08:57:48 -0000 Received-SPF: neutral (0: 72.66.166.145 is neither permitted nor denied by SPF record at gmail.com) Received: from unknown (HELO gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com) (66.249.93.114) by 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net with SMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:58:11 +0500 From: "Ian" ============ From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 19:30:10 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 81407 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 19:30:45 -0000 Received: from pool-141-149-38-158.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO gatworks.com) (141.149.38.158) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 19:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 18568 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 19:21:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatworks.com) (192.168.0.37) by gatworks.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 19:21:42 -0000 Message-ID: <43CD45C2.7070906@gatworks.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:30:10 -0500 From: "U. George" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Confusing Headers References: <43CD4315.6030406@t10.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit from unknown (HELO 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net) (72.66.166.145) of that (72.66.166.145) of that: [root@laptopserver MyRblsmtpd]# whois -h whois.arin.net 72.66.166.145 [Querying whois.arin.net] [whois.arin.net] OrgName: Verizon Internet Services Inc. OrgID: VRIS Address: 1880 Campus Commons Dr City: Reston StateProv: VA PostalCode: 20191 Country: US NetRange: 72.64.0.0 - 72.95.255.255 CIDR: 72.64.0.0/11 NetName: VIS-72-64 NetHandle: NET-72-64-0-0-1 Parent: NET-72-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.BELLATLANTIC.NET NameServer: NS2.VERIZON.NET NameServer: NS4.VERIZON.NET Comment: RegDate: 2005-06-24 Updated: 2005-12-13 OrgAbuseHandle: VISAB-ARIN OrgAbuseName: VIS Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-214-513-6711 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@verizon.net OrgTechHandle: ZV20-ARIN OrgTechName: Verizon Internet Services OrgTechPhone: +1-703-295-4583 OrgTechEmail: IPNMC@gnilink.net Eric wrote: > Can someone help me decipher the following email header. I'm trying to > figure out which one to block but I see google's > and Verizon's. Thanks for any help. - Eric > ============ > Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 2713, pid: 2714, t: 0.3547s > scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:35/d:1235 > spam: 3.1.0 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pobox1 > X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_50,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=3.1.0 > Received: from unknown (HELO 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net) (72.66.166.145) > by 0 with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 08:57:48 -0000 > Received-SPF: neutral (0: 72.66.166.145 is neither permitted nor denied by > SPF record at gmail.com) > Received: from unknown (HELO gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com) (66.249.93.114) > by 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net with SMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:58:11 +0500 > From: "Ian" > ============ > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 20:26:01 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 42947 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 20:26:39 -0000 Received: from mail2.cybergeneration.com (207.134.66.63) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 20:26:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 32458 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 20:11:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cybergeneration.com) (10.0.0.2) by mail2.cybergeneration.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 20:11:59 -0000 Received: from accessgeek by cybergeneration.com (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.1.R) with ESMTP id md50003868454.msg for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:27:27 -0500 Message-ID: <133c01c61ba4$3bd09630$b000a8c0@cybergeneration.com> From: "Maxime Ducharme" To: "Eric" , References: <43CD4315.6030406@t10.net> Subject: Re: Confusing Headers Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:26:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Spam-Processed: mail.cybergeneration.com, Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:27:27 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: mducharme@cybergeneration.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to X-MDAV-Processed: mail.cybergeneration.com, Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:27:31 -0500 Remember all "Received" headers can be spoofed, except for the last one When it looks like gibberish or if you see bogus adresses, always block the last one (after some verifications) 72.66.166.145 has a reverse DNS of pool-72-66-166-145.ronkva.east.verizon.net which doesnt looks like a valid SMTP server, I'd block this one HTH Maxime Ducharme ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:18 PM Subject: Confusing Headers > Can someone help me decipher the following email header. > I'm trying to figure out which one to block but I see google's > and Verizon's. Thanks for any help. - Eric > ============ > Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 2713, pid: 2714, t: 0.3547s > scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:35/d:1235 > spam: 3.1.0 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pobox1 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 > autolearn=no version=3.1.0 > Received: from unknown (HELO 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net) (72.66.166.145) > by 0 with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 08:57:48 -0000 > Received-SPF: neutral (0: 72.66.166.145 is neither permitted nor denied by > SPF record at gmail.com) > Received: from unknown (HELO gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com) (66.249.93.114) > by 5whe.i7iex.comcast.net with SMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:58:11 +0500 > From: "Ian" > ============ > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 20:40:51 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 58881 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 20:41:44 -0000 Received: from mail.microlinkdenver.com (69.25.214.14) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 20:41:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 2025 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 20:41:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 20:41:45 -0000 Message-ID: <43CD5653.50708@t10.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:40:51 -0700 From: Eric User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Re: Confusing Headers References: <43CD4315.6030406@t10.net> <133c01c61ba4$3bd09630$b000a8c0@cybergeneration.com> In-Reply-To: <133c01c61ba4$3bd09630$b000a8c0@cybergeneration.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Maxime Ducharme wrote: >Remember all "Received" headers can be spoofed, >except for the last one > >72.66.166.145 has a reverse DNS of >pool-72-66-166-145.ronkva.east.verizon.net >which doesnt looks like a valid SMTP server, I'd block this one > > Maime, thank you for this information. I know how to do whois's but I get confused on the headers. I know now to only trust the last one. Thanks again for the help on this. From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Tue Jan 17 21:59:29 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 46853 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 22:00:02 -0000 Received: from mail2.cybergeneration.com (207.134.66.63) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 22:00:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 911 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 21:45:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cybergeneration.com) (10.0.0.2) by mail2.cybergeneration.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 21:45:21 -0000 Received: from accessgeek by cybergeneration.com (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.1.R) with ESMTP id md50003870116.msg for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:00:53 -0500 Message-ID: <139901c61bb1$4a3f94c0$b000a8c0@cybergeneration.com> From: "Maxime Ducharme" To: "Eric" , References: <43CD4315.6030406@t10.net> <133c01c61ba4$3bd09630$b000a8c0@cybergeneration.com> <43CD5653.50708@t10.net> Subject: Re: Confusing Headers Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:59:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Spam-Processed: mail.cybergeneration.com, Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:00:53 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: mducharme@cybergeneration.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to X-MDAV-Processed: mail.cybergeneration.com, Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:00:55 -0500 You're welcome Some tricks on this problem : http://www.spamfo.co.uk/component/option,com_content/task,view/id,16/Itemid,25/ http://www.fmp.com/spam_patrol/tracking.html Some more infos for better understanding and HOWTO find untrustable headers : http://www.stopspam.org/email/headers.html http://www.bath.ac.uk/bucs/email/anatomy.shtml http://www.emailaddressmanager.com/tips/header.html http://www.hnc3k.com/email_headers.htm http://www.uic.edu/depts/accc/newsletter/adn29/headers.html http://antivirus.about.com/od/securitytips/l/aa081903e.htm http://www.stentorian.com/antispam/email.html http://members.tripod.com/~cyberstalked/header.htm http://help.mindspring.com/docs/006/emailheaders/emailheaders.php3 http://www.by-users.co.uk/faqs/email/headers/ Some info on IP & DNS sytem : http://www.samspade.org/d/ipdns.html Remember you cannot simply block the last one since many spam will come from a valid SMTP servers which relayed a mail from a bad source IP (which may be 2nd or 3rd Received in the email source). example: a infected computer connected on Verizon sends spam trough Verizon main SMTP server, but you also have friends using the same ISP. You would not want to block main SMTP, but only the bad source IP. Another good way to find bogus Received headers is to ensure servers's IP and reverse hostnames matches from a Received header to another. Have a good reading ;) Maxime Ducharme ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Confusing Headers > Maxime Ducharme wrote: > > >Remember all "Received" headers can be spoofed, > >except for the last one > > > >72.66.166.145 has a reverse DNS of > >pool-72-66-166-145.ronkva.east.verizon.net > >which doesnt looks like a valid SMTP server, I'd block this one > > > > > Maime, thank you for this information. I know how to do whois's but I > get confused > on the headers. I know now to only trust the last one. Thanks again for > the help on this. > > > From qmail@list.cr.yp.to Wed Jan 18 00:53:16 2006 Mailing-List: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 40205 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2006 01:01:48 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 18 Jan 2006 01:01:48 -0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ez1hG-0006kM-Sl for qmail@list.cr.yp.to; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:01:10 +0100 Received: from 84-51-160-78.pambow882.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([84.51.160.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:01:10 +0100 Received: from robin-lists by 84-51-160-78.pambow882.adsl.metronet.co.uk wit